Yueqing Kemao Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yueqing Kemao Electric Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 1,100+㎡ and 20+ staff. The company lists water-related products including drinking fountains, RO drinking fountains, bottle fillers, and atmospheric water generators. Its platform profile shows meaningful credibility indicators, including 13 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. However, the operating scale appears relatively small based on the available factory size and employee count.

Commercially, the supplier shows limited but existing transaction validation, with 10+ orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value over the past six months. Store rating is 4.2, but the review base is very small at only 3 reviews, limiting confidence in customer feedback reliability. Service response is within 4 hours, but no data is provided on Full Customization capability. Delivery performance is a concern, with an on-time delivery rate of 75.0%. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking verified small-scale suppliers, but procurement should proceed cautiously with sample orders, quality checks, and delivery controls.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 1,100+㎡
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a physical factory profile with disclosed production space and staff size. A factory area of 1,100+㎡ and 20+ employees indicates a relatively small manufacturing operation rather than a large-scale industrial supplier. The verified supplier status provides some support that the company has passed a basic supplier verification process, but no additional factory audit details or production capacity figures are provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates basic production capability and has some verified supplier backing. However, the small factory area and limited workforce suggest constrained production scale. Since there is no data on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, or major factory certifications, the score should remain within the “small but basic production capability” range.

Final Score: 12/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier years: 13 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 75.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a long platform history, with 13 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance support adds a transactional protection mechanism for buyers. Verified supplier status further strengthens platform credibility. However, the available certification labels mainly reflect service and delivery indicators rather than independent product certifications or detailed factory audit documentation.

Scoring Rationale:
The long Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support are strong credibility signals. The supplier also has verified status, which supports basic compliance confidence. The score is not at the maximum level because the provided data does not include full factory audit reports, product certifications, or complete compliance documentation.

Final Score: 18/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Past 6-month orders: 10+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥270.4K+
- Store rating: 4.2
- Reviews: 3

Elaboration:
The supplier has completed measurable transactions over the past six months, showing that the store is commercially active. However, 10+ orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value indicate a modest transaction scale. The store rating of 4.2 is acceptable but not high, and the very small number of reviews limits the reliability of the rating as a broad market validation indicator.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has some recent order and transaction activity, which is positive. However, the order count, review base, and rating level do not support classification as a high-performing supplier. The business record is better than no validation, but still relatively limited.

Final Score: 11/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of within 4 hours suggests acceptable communication availability, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour. No data is provided regarding Full Customization, design support, OEM/ODM capability, or dedicated engineering support.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates reasonable response speed, which supports basic service capability. However, the lack of customization data prevents a higher score. Without evidence of Full Customization or advanced communication support, the supplier should be rated in the normal-response, basic-service range.

Final Score: 6/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 75.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 75.0%. This falls within the 70–79% range, indicating that delivery reliability is below strong procurement expectations. For buyers with strict project timelines, this metric represents a meaningful operational risk.

Scoring Rationale:
Based strictly on the scoring standard, a 75.0% on-time delivery rate corresponds to the 5–6 point range. Since the rate is in the middle of the 70–79% bracket, the supplier receives a moderate-low delivery score.

Final Score: 6/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.2
- Reviews: 3
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier has a store rating of 4.2, which suggests acceptable customer satisfaction, but the rating is based on only 3 reviews. This very limited review volume reduces confidence in the feedback profile. There is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection or a detailed quality assurance system. Verified supplier status provides some platform-level assurance, but it does not fully substitute for documented quality inspection procedures.

Scoring Rationale:
The quality profile has partial positive indicators, including a reasonable rating and verified supplier status. However, the low review count and missing Finished Product Inspection data limit confidence. The score reflects basic quality visibility but insufficient customer feedback depth and incomplete quality assurance evidence.

Final Score: 11/20

Total Score

64/100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for low-to-medium volume buyers who can tolerate moderate supplier risk and are willing to validate quality and delivery through sample orders or small trial purchases first. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking verified platform suppliers for drinking fountains, bottle fillers, RO drinking fountains, or atmospheric water generator products, based only on the listed product data.

Key risks include small factory scale, limited review volume, modest recent order count, missing customization and Finished Product Inspection data, and a 75.0% on-time delivery rate. Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s 13-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status, but stronger evidence of quality control, delivery reliability, and customer feedback would be needed before placing large or time-sensitive procurement orders.