Yueqing Xiaogu Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yueqing Xiaogu Electric Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, offering cable clips, fir tree sockets, connector clips, nylon cable ties, and related fastening components. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale manufacturer or supplier, with a factory area of 1,200+ m² and 10+ staff. It has Gold Supplier status for 3 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a reasonable level of platform credibility. Its recent business performance shows 30+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating but only 10+ reviews. The supplier demonstrates strong delivery reliability with a 100.0% on-time delivery rate and fast response time of ≤1 hour. It is most suitable for buyers seeking small to medium-volume procurement, sample orders, or flexible low-MOQ sourcing, while larger buyers should further verify production capacity and quality inspection systems.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 1,200+ m²
- Employee count: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical factory scale of 1,200+ m² and a small workforce of 10+ staff. This indicates basic production or supply capability but does not demonstrate a large-scale manufacturing structure. The verified supplier status provides some confidence that the company has undergone a platform-level verification process. However, the provided data does not include detailed production lines, monthly capacity, machinery quantity, R&D staff, or factory audit reports.

Scoring Rationale
The company does not qualify as a large-scale or clearly mid-sized factory based on the available factory size and staff count. However, the presence of a verified supplier status and an identifiable factory area supports the view that it has basic operational capability rather than being purely trading-oriented with no visible production base. Because production capacity details are limited, the score remains in the lower-middle range.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: ODM service available, Response time ≤1h, On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform trust indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. A 3-year Gold Supplier history suggests a moderate platform presence, though it is not long enough to be considered highly established. The provided labels support service and delivery credibility but do not include specific international product certifications, factory management certifications, or industry compliance documents.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a reasonably reliable vendor: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. However, the Gold Supplier period is moderate rather than long-term, and the certification profile is not comprehensive. Since no specific product compliance certificates or factory management certifications are provided, the score is strong but not at the highest level.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 30+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Number of reviews: 10+

Elaboration
The supplier has generated measurable platform transactions over the past six months, with 30+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ in transaction value. This indicates active commercial activity, though the transaction scale is not high. The store rating of 4.9 is strong, but the review base of 10+ is still relatively limited, meaning the rating has not yet been validated by a large number of buyers.

Scoring Rationale
The business data shows that the supplier is commercially active and has completed recent orders, which reduces the risk of dealing with an inactive or untested supplier. However, both order quantity and transaction value suggest a relatively small to moderate business scale. The high rating supports buyer satisfaction, but the limited review count prevents a higher score.

Final Score
14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1 hour
- ODM service available
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong responsiveness, with a stated response time of no more than one hour. This is a positive indicator for communication efficiency, especially for sample confirmation, order clarification, and after-sales coordination. The ODM service label suggests some ability to support product development or adapted product requirements. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports full customization, private labeling, packaging customization, or buyer-specific engineering changes.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed meets the highest service standard, and ODM availability adds value for buyers needing some level of product adaptation. Nevertheless, because Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the supplier cannot be scored as having complete customization capability. The service profile is strong for communication and basic ODM support, but not fully proven for complex custom projects.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator in the provided dataset. This suggests that recent platform-recorded shipments have been completed within the agreed delivery timeline. No additional data is provided regarding average lead time, logistics methods, or delayed shipment history.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the top score range. Since the supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, it receives the maximum score for this dimension. The only limitation is that the underlying number of shipments is not separately provided.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Review count: 10+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided; detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which indicates positive customer feedback from existing buyers. However, the review count is only 10+, so the feedback base is still limited. The verified supplier status provides some credibility, but the data does not confirm whether the company has a Finished Product Inspection process, third-party quality inspection reports, ISO certification, product testing documentation, or detailed quality control procedures.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows positive quality-related signals through its high rating and verified supplier status. However, the limited number of reviews and absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection reduce the strength of the quality assurance profile. The score reflects good early-stage customer feedback but not a fully validated quality management system.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

75 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Yueqing Xiaogu Electric Co., Ltd. is recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for buyers seeking small to medium-volume sourcing of cable clips, connector clips, fir tree sockets, and nylon cable tie-related products. The supplier is suitable for sample orders, low-MOQ procurement, and buyers who value fast communication and strong on-time delivery performance.

The main strengths are its platform credibility, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, fast response time, 100.0% on-time delivery rate, and positive 4.9 store rating. The main risks are its small company scale, limited staff count, relatively modest six-month transaction volume, low review base, and insufficient data on finished product inspection, formal factory audit scope, and detailed quality management systems.

For larger-volume or quality-critical procurement, buyers should request additional documentation before placing significant orders, including production capacity details, QC process records, product inspection reports, and sample validation. Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential as a flexible small-scale supplier, but further verification is necessary before strategic or high-volume cooperation.