Taihe County Baiyun Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Taihe County Baiyun Plastic Industry Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Taihe County Baiyun Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Anhui, offering 3D printing filament-related products including PLA, PLA matte, silk filament, and ABS GF filament. Based on the provided data, the company has a relatively sizable factory area of over 26,000㎡ and more than 70 staff, indicating a basic-to-medium production foundation. The supplier is listed as a Gold Supplier on for 1 year, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a certain level of platform credibility. However, its commercial validation remains limited, with only 30+ orders and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value over the past six months, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. The most significant concern is delivery performance, with an on-time dispatch rate of only 50.0%. This supplier may be suitable for low-risk trial orders or buyers seeking flexible customization, but it requires careful order monitoring before larger-scale procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company name: Taihe County Baiyun Plastic Industry Co., Ltd.
• Country: China
• Factory location: Anhui
• Factory area: 26,000+㎡
• Employees: 70+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a factory area exceeding 26,000㎡, which indicates a meaningful physical production base. The employee count of 70+ staff suggests that the company is not a very small workshop, but it also does not indicate a large-scale labor force. The provided verification status strengthens the credibility of its factory presence and basic operational capability.

The product information shows multiple 3D printing filament-related SKUs, including PLA filament, ABS GF filament, matte PLA, silk filament, and 1kg PLA filament. This indicates some product range depth within the 3D printing consumables category. However, the provided data does not include annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment details, export volume, warehouse capacity, or major customer references.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates a reasonable production foundation through its 26,000+㎡ factory area and 70+ staff. The verified supplier status further supports its legitimacy as a manufacturing or supply entity. However, the workforce size is moderate, and there is insufficient data on production capacity, factory certifications, production automation, or large-scale supply performance. Therefore, it should be assessed as a medium-sized supplier with stable basic capacity rather than a large-scale mature supply chain.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Certification / industry labels provided:
• Warranty available
• Full customization
• ODM service available
• Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform trust elements, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are positive credibility indicators for buyers using as a sourcing channel. Trade Assurance can provide transactional protection, while verified supplier status supports the authenticity of the supplier’s operating profile.

However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 1 year, which limits the historical platform credibility compared with suppliers that have maintained verified status for many years. The listed tags mainly relate to service capabilities such as customization, ODM availability, warranty, and minor customization. No independent product certifications, management system certifications, industry compliance certificates, or test reports are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements required for basic sourcing confidence: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the short 1-year Gold Supplier history and lack of provided formal compliance certifications prevent it from being rated as a highly established or long-term proven platform supplier. The credibility level is acceptable but still developing.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 30+
• Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥6.7K+
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded 30+ orders over the past six months, which shows some transaction activity. However, the transaction amount of CN¥6.7K+ is relatively limited, indicating that the order scale is small based on the provided data. The lack of store rating and the presence of 0 reviews create a major limitation in evaluating buyer satisfaction, repeat purchase behavior, and commercial reputation.

The low review count also means there is no visible customer feedback base to validate product quality, service reliability, or delivery consistency from previous buyers. While some order activity exists, the commercial evidence is not strong enough to confirm stable market acceptance or high-volume sales performance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has achieved a basic level of transaction activity, but the commercial scale remains limited. The combination of 30+ orders and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value suggests small-ticket or early-stage platform sales rather than strong business momentum. The absence of a store rating and 0 reviews significantly weakens commercial validation. Therefore, the score falls within the lower-to-mid range.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Response time: ≤5h
• Full customization: Available
• ODM service: Available
• Minor customization: Available
• Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤5 hours indicates a reasonable communication level, though it does not meet the highest service benchmark of response within 1 hour. The presence of full customization, ODM service, and minor customization labels suggests that the supplier can support different levels of buyer requirements, from simple adjustments to more customized product arrangements.

The availability of warranty support is also positive, although the dataset does not specify the warranty scope, duration, claim procedure, or after-sales terms. Therefore, the service capability appears functional and flexible, but not fully verifiable in terms of depth or execution reliability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier offers multiple customization-related service labels, which is a clear advantage for buyers requiring flexible product adaptation. However, the response time is moderate rather than excellent, and there is insufficient data on communication quality, sample handling, engineering support, or after-sales performance. As a result, the supplier fits the “normal response with customization capability” category.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 50.0%

Elaboration

The provided on-time dispatch rate is 50.0%, which is a major concern from a procurement perspective. This means that, based on the available platform data, only half of the shipments were dispatched on time. For buyers with fixed production schedules, marketplace launch deadlines, or inventory replenishment plans, this level of delivery reliability may create operational risk.

No additional logistics data is provided, such as average lead time, shipping method, order preparation cycle, or historical delay reasons. Therefore, the evaluation must be based strictly on the reported 50.0% on-time dispatch rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring framework, a delivery performance rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. Since the supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is only 50.0%, this indicates weak delivery reliability and requires active management. This is one of the most significant risk factors in the supplier profile.

Final Score

3 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Product categories provided: 3D printing filament-related products

Elaboration

The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some support for basic supplier authenticity and factory credibility. However, there is no store rating available and the number of customer reviews is 0. This makes it difficult to assess actual buyer satisfaction, consistency of product quality, after-sales responsiveness, or defect handling.

The dataset does not provide Finished Product Inspection information, quality control process details, product test reports, material certifications, dimensional tolerance data, or third-party inspection records. For 3D printing filament products, consistency-related factors can be important, but no technical quality evidence is provided in the current data. Therefore, the quality evaluation is constrained by insufficient customer feedback and limited quality assurance information.

Scoring Rationale

The verified supplier status is a positive quality-related indicator, but it is not enough to confirm product-level quality control. The lack of store rating, 0 reviews, and no provided Finished Product Inspection data create a weak feedback foundation. As a result, the supplier cannot be considered quality-proven based on the available information.

Final Score

8 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation only.

Taihe County Baiyun Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. may be considered for small trial orders, sample-based evaluation, or low-risk procurement projects involving 3D printing filament products. Its strengths include a 26,000+㎡ factory area, 70+ staff, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and available customization options including full customization, ODM service, and minor customization.

However, it is not recommended for immediate large-volume or time-sensitive procurement based on the current data. The key risks are:

1. Weak delivery performance: On-time dispatch rate is only 50.0%.
2. Limited business validation: Only CN¥6.7K+ transaction value in the past six months.
3. Lack of customer feedback: Store rating is unavailable and reviews are 0.
4. Insufficient quality assurance data: Finished Product Inspection information is not provided.
5. Short platform history: Gold Supplier duration is only 1 year.

The supplier shows growth potential due to its factory size, verified status, and customization capability. Buyers should start with sample orders or small batches, use Trade Assurance, define delivery deadlines clearly, request quality inspection evidence, and monitor fulfillment performance before scaling cooperation.