zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Longyao County Xuri Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Longyao County Xuri Food Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of 25,000+㎡ and 110+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a medium-sized production supplier focused on chili-related seasoning products, including gochugaru flakes, chili powder, paprika powder, cayenne products, and OEM bulk supply options. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and delivery performance: the supplier has 19 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, is marked as a verified supplier, and reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. However, its recent commercial validation is relatively limited, with only 10+ orders and 3 reviews in the past six months, despite a favorable 4.8 store rating. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking stable sourcing of chili powder and spice products with customization options, especially for trial orders or medium-volume procurement. Further verification is recommended for quality control processes and food-grade compliance documentation.

Longyao County Xuri Food Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company Name: Longyao County Xuri Food Co., Ltd.
  • Country: China
  • Province: Hebei
  • Factory Area: 25,000+㎡
  • Employees: 110+ staff
  • Verified Supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively solid physical production base, with a factory area exceeding 25,000㎡. This indicates that the company has more than a small workshop-level operation and likely maintains dedicated space for production, storage, or processing activities. The reported workforce of 110+ staff also supports the view that the supplier has a structured operating team rather than a very small-scale trading operation.

The supplier is marked as a verified supplier, which adds credibility to its stated factory presence. However, the data does not provide detailed information on annual production capacity, production lines, equipment, food safety systems, export volume, or factory audit reports. Therefore, while the physical scale is meaningful, the evaluation cannot confirm whether the company has large-scale automated production or advanced manufacturing capabilities.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size of 25,000+㎡ is a strong indicator of operational capacity, and 110+ employees suggests a medium-sized manufacturing organization. The verified supplier status further supports basic supplier credibility. However, the company does not provide detailed capacity figures, equipment data, or specific factory certification information in the supplied dataset. As a result, it should be assessed as a medium-sized stable factory rather than a fully proven large-scale global supply chain operator.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier Duration: 19 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified Supplier: True
  • Certification / Industry Tags:
  • Warranty available
  • Full customization
  • ODM service available
  • Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a notably long Gold Supplier history of 19 years. This is a significant platform credibility indicator, as long-term continuity on a major B2B platform generally reflects stable account operation and a sustained commercial presence. The availability of Trade Assurance also improves buyer protection during transactions, especially for payment security and order-related disputes.

The supplier also carries platform-related capability tags such as warranty availability, full customization, ODM service availability, and minor customization. These tags suggest that the supplier is positioned to support different procurement models, including standard purchasing, customized packaging or formulation requests, and ODM-related cooperation.

However, the provided data does not include specific food safety certifications, export certifications, third-party audit certificates, or compliance documents such as HACCP, ISO, BRC, FDA registration, or similar certifications. Therefore, the compliance assessment is strong at the platform level but incomplete at the regulatory or industry certification level.

Scoring Rationale

The 19-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status provide strong platform credibility. These factors place the supplier above many short-tenure or unverified vendors. Nevertheless, the absence of specific product, food safety, or factory certification details prevents a maximum score. The supplier demonstrates strong -based credibility, but external compliance documentation remains insufficient based on the provided data.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in Past 6 Months: 10+
  • Transaction Value in Past 6 Months: CN¥135.2K+
  • Store Rating: 4.8
  • Number of Reviews: 3

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded 10+ orders over the past six months, with a transaction value above CN¥135.2K. This shows that the supplier has recent transaction activity and is not inactive on the platform. The store rating of 4.8 is positive and suggests that available buyers have generally had a satisfactory experience.

However, the number of reviews is only 3, which limits the reliability of the rating as a broad market indicator. A high score based on very few reviews carries less statistical confidence than a similar rating supported by dozens or hundreds of buyer evaluations. The order count of 10+ over six months also indicates relatively limited visible transaction volume compared with highly active suppliers.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates real recent business activity, but the scale is modest. CN¥135.2K+ in six-month transaction value provides some commercial validation, yet the order quantity and review base remain limited. The 4.8 rating is favorable, but with only 3 reviews, it cannot be treated as strong proof of broad customer satisfaction. Therefore, the supplier fits the “lower transaction scale or fewer orders” category rather than a high-performance commercial supplier.

Final Score

12 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication Response Time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Available
  • ODM Service: Available
  • Minor Customization: Available

Elaboration

The supplier reports a response time of within 2 hours, which is acceptable for B2B procurement communication and indicates that buyers are likely to receive timely replies during sourcing discussions. The supplier also supports full customization, ODM service, and minor customization, giving it flexibility for buyers who require product adaptation, private-label supply, or customized order specifications.

The data does not provide additional indicators such as quote turnaround time, sample lead time, dedicated account management, multilingual support, after-sales handling records, or dispute resolution history. Therefore, service capability can be considered solid but not fully proven beyond platform-listed responsiveness and customization tags.

Scoring Rationale

The response speed of ≤2h is good but does not reach the highest benchmark of ≤1h. The availability of full customization and ODM service strengthens the service profile, especially for buyers needing tailored spice products or OEM/ODM cooperation. However, due to the lack of deeper service performance data, the score should remain within the good but not top-tier range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-Time Shipment Rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate, which is the strongest available delivery indicator in the provided dataset. This suggests that, based on recorded platform data, the supplier has been able to meet agreed shipment timelines.

However, the dataset does not provide the number of shipments behind this percentage, average lead time, shipping destinations, logistics methods, or performance under large-volume orders. Therefore, while the delivery rate is excellent, the depth of validation is limited by the absence of shipment volume details.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported on-time shipment rate is 100.0%, it deserves the maximum score for this dimension. The limited order volume should be considered in overall risk analysis, but the delivery metric itself is excellent.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store Rating: 4.8
  • Number of Reviews: 3
  • Verified Supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Verified Supplier marked as True
  • Product Categories Provided: Chili powder, gochugaru flakes, paprika powder, cayenne products, OEM bulk supply

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.8, which indicates favorable buyer feedback among the limited available review base. The verified supplier status also provides a basic level of trust regarding supplier identity or factory-related verification.

However, the review count is only 3, which is not enough to strongly validate long-term quality consistency. In addition, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier has a finished product inspection process, food-grade quality control certification, batch testing capability, contaminant testing, traceability system, or third-party inspection arrangement. For food and spice products, quality control documentation is especially important, but such information is not included in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The 4.8 rating is positive, and verified supplier status supports a basic quality credibility framework. However, the very small number of reviews weakens the reliability of customer feedback. The absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection data and specific food safety or quality certifications prevents a higher score. The supplier shows acceptable quality indicators but requires further document verification before being treated as a low-risk food ingredient supplier.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 12 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 14 / 20
Total Score 78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Longyao County Xuri Food Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, a medium-sized factory base, good service responsiveness, customization capability, and excellent reported delivery performance. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking chili powder, gochugaru flakes, paprika powder, cayenne-related products, or OEM bulk spice supply, especially for trial orders, medium-volume purchasing, private-label exploration, and price-sensitive sourcing programs.

However, buyers should treat the supplier as a qualified but still verification-required supplier rather than a fully validated strategic partner. The main risks are limited recent order volume, only 3 customer reviews, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, food safety certifications, laboratory testing, or export compliance documentation.

Before placing large-volume or long-term orders, procurement teams should request: - Food safety and quality certifications, if available
- Finished product inspection procedures
- Product specifications and COA documents
- Sample testing before bulk purchase
- Packaging, labeling, and customization confirmation
- Production lead time and batch consistency details

Overall, the supplier has good growth potential due to its long platform history, factory scale, customization capability, and strong delivery metric, but quality compliance verification is essential before scaling procurement.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Zigui County Qugu Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zigui County Qugu Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haifeng County Huasheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haifeng County Huasheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pujiang County Xiaoyan Handicraft Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pujiang County Xiaoyan Handicraft Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinxiang County Zhongwen Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinxiang County Zhongwen Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changxing County Qizhimeng Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changxing County Qizhimeng Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fengshun County Hosen Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fengshun County Hosen Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lingshou County Xuyang Mining Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lingshou County Xuyang Mining Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Xingpeng Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Xingpeng Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cao County Jiusi Woods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cao County Jiusi Woods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuqiang County Huili Fiberglass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuqiang County Huili Fiberglass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jia County Yihong Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jia County Yihong Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Comesh Filter Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Comesh Filter Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Pfm Screen Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Pfm Screen Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huidong County Jilong Mingteng Shoe Factory Supplier Evaluation
Huidong County Jilong Mingteng Shoe Factory Supplier Evaluation
Lingshou County Teyuan Mineral Processing Plant Supplier Evaluation
Lingshou County Teyuan Mineral Processing Plant Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Joylink Wire Mesh Factory Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Joylink Wire Mesh Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinofarm Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinofarm Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xuanyi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xuanyi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Mingliang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Mingliang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Licheng Tools, Co, Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Licheng Tools, Co, Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Dongguan Baiao Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Baiao Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhongtong Battery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhongtong Battery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shensheng Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shensheng Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meichuang Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meichuang Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Meiyun Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Meiyun Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Tiankang Electrical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Tiankang Electrical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mesky Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mesky Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Caifull Precision Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Caifull Precision Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shouguang Dawn Forest Wood Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shouguang Dawn Forest Wood Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Annxin Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Annxin Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ecomake (China) International Trade Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ecomake (China) International Trade Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tester Integrated Housing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tester Integrated Housing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Huanshan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Huanshan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sankin New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sankin New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Jubao New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Jubao New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Youli Compressor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Youli Compressor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Hengfu Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Hengfu Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Deniswear Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Deniswear Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bohao Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bohao Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Dixsen Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Dixsen Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026