zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shandong Xuanyi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shandong Xuanyi Food Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong Province, with reported factory scale of 18,000+㎡ and 450+ staff. The company is listed as a verified supplier and operates on as a 7-year Gold Supplier with Trade Assurance support, indicating a relatively credible platform presence. Its listed product scope includes ginger-related products, fresh carrots, and fermented black garlic, with MOQ levels ranging from small trial quantities to bulk metric-ton orders. Business performance shows limited order volume in the past six months, with 6 orders and CN¥878.9K+ transaction value, suggesting fewer but potentially higher-value transactions. The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, but only 6 reviews, so customer feedback depth remains limited. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking agricultural food products from a verified mid-to-large-scale Chinese supplier, especially where platform protection and delivery reliability are important.

Shandong Xuanyi Food Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company: Shandong Xuanyi Food Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Shandong Province, China
  • Factory area: 18,000+㎡
  • Employees: 450+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a sizeable production and operational base, with more than 18,000㎡ of factory area and over 450 employees. This indicates a relatively strong organizational and production foundation compared with small-scale trading entities or small workshops. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of a formal business and operating structure.

The company’s product listings cover food and agricultural categories such as ginger products, fresh carrots, and fermented black garlic. However, the provided data does not include detailed annual output, production lines, export markets, food safety certifications, or third-party factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indication.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates clear company scale through factory area and workforce size. A facility of 18,000+㎡ and 450+ staff supports the view that it has stronger production capacity than a small supplier. The verified supplier status also adds credibility. However, because the data does not provide detailed production capacity, factory audit documentation, or formal manufacturing certifications, the score should not reach the maximum range.

Final Score

18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / platform tags: “Response time ≤5h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 7 years, which indicates a relatively established platform history. Trade Assurance support provides additional transactional protection for buyers using ’s platform. The verified supplier status also strengthens platform credibility.

The available certification or industry tag information mainly relates to response time and delivery performance. No additional food safety certifications, factory management certifications, or product compliance certificates are provided in the dataset. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, broader compliance documentation remains insufficient based on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

A 7-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status form a solid platform credibility profile. These are meaningful trust indicators for procurement screening. However, the compliance side is not fully documented, as no specific product certifications or quality management certifications are provided. This prevents a full-score assessment, but the platform-backed credibility remains strong.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 6
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥878.9K+
  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 6

Elaboration

The supplier’s recent transaction value is relatively meaningful at CN¥878.9K+ over the past six months. However, the number of orders is only 6, indicating limited recent order frequency. This may suggest that the supplier handles fewer transactions with larger order values, but the data does not provide order composition or buyer details, so that conclusion cannot be confirmed.

The store rating is excellent at 5.0, but the review count is only 6. As a result, the rating is positive but based on a limited customer feedback sample. The business record supports some commercial validation, but not enough to classify the supplier as having high-volume or broadly proven market traction.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows real transaction activity and a notable transaction amount, which supports business credibility. However, the low number of recent orders and limited review base reduce the strength of commercial validation. The performance appears better than an unproven supplier but does not meet the profile of a high-order-volume, widely validated supplier.

Final Score

13 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤5h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a stated response time of ≤5 hours, which indicates acceptable communication responsiveness for general sourcing inquiries. This is suitable for routine procurement communication, price confirmation, sample discussion, and order coordination.

However, the provided data does not indicate whether the supplier supports Full Customization, private labeling, packaging customization, formula customization, or buyer-specific processing requirements. Because customization capability is a key part of this dimension, the absence of such information limits the assessment.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is reasonable but does not reach the strongest service level defined by response within one hour. More importantly, there is no provided evidence of Full Customization capability. Therefore, the supplier can be considered to have basic communication service capability, but advanced service flexibility is not confirmed.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. This is a strong delivery indicator and suggests that, based on the available platform data, the supplier has met delivery timing expectations for recorded transactions.

However, the dataset does not provide the total number of shipments behind this percentage, nor does it clarify whether the metric is based on all recent orders or only platform-tracked transactions. Even so, the stated on-time delivery rate directly meets the highest scoring range for this dimension.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, delivery performance above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. A reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate supports a full score for this dimension. The only limitation is the lack of shipment sample size, but the metric itself is clearly at the highest level.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 6
  • Verified supplier / Factory Verification: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is a positive quality and customer satisfaction indicator. However, this rating is supported by only 6 reviews, meaning the feedback base is limited. A small review sample reduces the statistical reliability of the rating when assessing long-term quality consistency.

The verified supplier status provides a basic layer of supplier credibility. However, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, food safety certification, batch inspection procedures, third-party quality audits, or formal quality management certifications. For food-related procurement, the absence of documented quality assurance details is an important information gap.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a strong visible rating and verified status, but the limited number of reviews and absence of Finished Product Inspection data prevent a higher score. The quality profile is positive at a basic level, but it is not yet supported by broad customer feedback or detailed quality control documentation.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 18 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 13 / 20
Service Capability 6 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 14 / 20
Total Score 79 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditionally Recommended

Shandong Xuanyi Food Co., Ltd. is a suitable candidate for buyers seeking ginger products, fresh carrots, or fermented black garlic from a verified Chinese supplier with solid company scale and platform credibility. The supplier is especially appropriate for buyers who value Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and strong reported delivery performance.

Suitable customer types:
- Importers or distributors sourcing agricultural food products
- Buyers requiring medium-to-large supplier scale
- Buyers preferring Trade Assurance transactions
- Customers who can start with controlled trial orders before scaling volume

Main risks:
- Limited recent order count: only 6 orders in the past six months
- Limited review base: 6 reviews despite a 5.0 rating
- Finished Product Inspection information is not provided
- Full Customization capability is not provided
- No specific food safety or product compliance certifications are included in the supplied data

Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong platform credibility, verified status, sizeable factory scale, and excellent reported delivery performance. If it can provide more quality documentation, inspection records, certification details, and a larger verified customer feedback base, its procurement attractiveness would improve further.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shandong Sinofarm Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinofarm Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaibei Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaibei Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Gaineng Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Gaineng Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jianong Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jianong Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Guangtou Liji Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Guangtou Liji Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Huaya Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Huaya Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Mingliang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Mingliang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Hotest Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Hotest Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningxia Hongshanhe Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningxia Hongshanhe Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jushu Food Co.. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jushu Food Co.. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Jiaduohao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Jiaduohao Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Saiyang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Saiyang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amos Food (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amos Food (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Jinjie Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Jinjie Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Anran Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Anran Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lishui Mingyuan Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lishui Mingyuan Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinghua Lianfu Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinghua Lianfu Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dalian Gaishi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dalian Gaishi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhixi (Shanghai) Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhixi (Shanghai) Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Wenzhou Moonpack Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Moonpack Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Bohang International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Bohang International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Yongjiang Food Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Yongjiang Food Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tonglu Huayuan Imp& Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tonglu Huayuan Imp& Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huzhou Dayou Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huzhou Dayou Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Qinghai Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Qinghai Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cardoria Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cardoria Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Airhorse Compressor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Airhorse Compressor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Jia Pei Science And Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Jia Pei Science And Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Meixing Electromechanical Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Meixing Electromechanical Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ruian Shangyi Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruian Shangyi Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ctechi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ctechi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Huilin Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Huilin Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Link Sense Intelligent Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Link Sense Intelligent Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Leton Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Leton Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Leikexing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Leikexing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Koofex Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Koofex Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changxing County Qizhimeng Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changxing County Qizhimeng Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Matsumoto Machine Tool Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Matsumoto Machine Tool Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Oto Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Oto Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026