Chengdu Jia Pei Science And Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Chengdu Jia Pei Science And Technology Development Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Sichuan, with a reported factory area of 6,200+㎡ and 100+ staff. Based on the provided product listings, the company appears to focus on greenhouse-related structures and accessories, including sawtooth greenhouses, single-span greenhouse products, mobile chicken-related structures, greenhouse film lock channels, and blackout greenhouse solutions. The supplier has a strong platform history, being a 14-year Gold Supplier with Trade Assurance support and verified supplier status. Commercial performance shows moderate order activity with 20+ orders in the past six months and a relatively strong transaction value of CN¥2.5M+, supported by a high store rating of 4.9, though the review count is limited at 6. Delivery performance is acceptable but not strong, with an on-time delivery rate of 80.0%. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking medium-scale greenhouse-related sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection, while delivery consistency and limited customer feedback remain key risks.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company name: Chengdu Jia Pei Science And Technology Development Co., Ltd.
• Location: Sichuan, China
• Factory area: 6,200+㎡
• Employees: 100+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory verification status: True

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a moderate physical production foundation, with a factory area exceeding 6,200 square meters and more than 100 staff. This indicates that the company is not a small workshop-level supplier and likely has basic organizational and production capacity to support regular commercial orders. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the reported operational scale, as it suggests that at least part of the company’s factory or supplier information has been checked through the platform or a verification process.

However, the provided data does not include detailed production lines, annual capacity, machinery lists, export volume, factory audit reports, or specific factory certifications. Therefore, while the company shows a stable mid-sized manufacturing base, there is insufficient evidence to classify it as a large-scale or highly audited supply chain operation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturer. The 6,200+㎡ factory area and 100+ staff provide a reasonable production foundation, and verified supplier status strengthens confidence in its operational legitimacy. However, the absence of detailed production capacity data and formal factory certification information limits the score from reaching the highest range.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 14 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry labels provided: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 80.0%”

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 14-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with transaction protection, which is important for international procurement risk control. The verified supplier status further supports basic credibility.

However, the listed tags mainly relate to service and delivery performance rather than formal product certifications, factory management certifications, or industry compliance certificates. No ISO certification, product testing certification, export compliance document, or third-party audit report is provided in the dataset. Therefore, the supplier has strong platform-based credibility but limited evidence of broader compliance certification.

Scoring Rationale

The long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status together create a strong platform-backed trust profile. These factors justify a high score. Nevertheless, because the certification/industry tag information is incomplete and does not show formal compliance certifications, the supplier does not receive a near-perfect score.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 20+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥2.5M+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 6

Elaboration

The supplier shows measurable commercial activity. Over the past six months, it has received more than 20 orders and achieved a transaction value exceeding CN¥2.5 million. This indicates that the supplier has active buyers and is capable of handling commercial transactions of meaningful value.

The store rating of 4.9 is positive and suggests a favorable buyer experience among reviewers. However, the review base is small, with only 6 reviews. This limits the statistical reliability of the rating. The order quantity is also moderate rather than high. The transaction amount is comparatively stronger than the order count, which may indicate larger-value orders, but the provided data does not allow confirmation of order size distribution or buyer types.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates stable business activity, especially with CN¥2.5M+ transaction value in six months. However, 20+ orders is not a high-volume transaction record, and only 6 reviews makes customer validation limited. The supplier therefore fits the category of a stable medium-scale performer rather than a highly proven high-volume supplier.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. For procurement purposes, this is a positive service indicator, especially for initial quotation, order clarification, and follow-up communication.

However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization. Although some product names include the word “Customized,” the dataset does not explicitly state platform-certified customization capability, design support, OEM/ODM service, engineering customization, or technical drawing support. Therefore, customization capability must be treated as Insufficient Data rather than assumed.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤2h supports a reasonable service capability score, but it does not meet the highest standard of ≤1h. In addition, the lack of confirmed Full Customization data limits the supplier’s service evaluation. The company appears responsive enough for standard procurement communication, but its advanced customization service capability is not fully verified.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 80.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is exactly 80.0%. According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to a score range of 7 to 8 points. This indicates that the supplier has a basic level of delivery reliability but is not yet in the strong delivery performance category.

For buyers with flexible project timelines, this delivery level may be acceptable. However, for buyers with strict project installation schedules, seasonal agricultural requirements, or time-sensitive construction windows, an 80.0% on-time delivery rate may represent a meaningful risk.

Scoring Rationale

Because the supplier is at the lower boundary of the 80–89% range, the appropriate score is 7 rather than 8. The supplier meets the threshold for acceptable delivery performance but does not demonstrate consistently strong punctuality.

Final Score

7 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 6
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive signal for customer satisfaction. The verified supplier status also adds some confidence regarding company authenticity and basic operational verification.

However, the number of reviews is only 6, which is too limited to form a strong customer feedback base. A high rating based on a small number of reviews is less reliable than the same rating supported by hundreds of reviews. Additionally, the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, quality control standards, inspection reports, or quality certifications. Therefore, the quality assurance system cannot be considered fully verified.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves credit for its high rating and verified supplier status, but the low review count and lack of explicit Finished Product Inspection information prevent a higher score. The available data supports a positive but still limited quality evaluation.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for selective cooperation with risk controls.

Chengdu Jia Pei Science And Technology Development Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking greenhouse-related products and structures from a medium-sized supplier with long platform history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. The company is particularly suitable for buyers who value platform-backed transaction security and are sourcing medium-scale greenhouse projects, accessories, or related structural products.

The main risks are the limited number of customer reviews, lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection data, insufficient evidence of formal product or factory certifications, and an on-time delivery rate of only 80.0%. Buyers with strict delivery deadlines should confirm lead times, production schedules, and shipment milestones before placing orders.

The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its 14-year Gold Supplier record, CN¥2.5M+ transaction value over the past six months, and stable factory size. For procurement teams, it is advisable to start with sample orders or phased purchasing, use Trade Assurance, request product inspection evidence, and confirm technical specifications in writing before bulk procurement.