Lvsen Pakeng Technology (Chengdu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Lvsen Pakeng Technology (Chengdu) Co., Ltd.
Country/Province: China, Sichuan

Executive Summary

Lvsen Pakeng Technology (Chengdu) Co., Ltd. appears to be a China-based packaging supplier with a relatively solid operational foundation. The provided data shows a factory area of over 33,000㎡, more than 140 staff, and verified supplier status, indicating a meaningful production base rather than a small trading-only operation. Its listed products focus on customized paper bags, luxury packaging bags, jewelry paper bags, coffee cups, and disposable cup-related products, with MOQs ranging from 1,000 to 5,000 pieces.

On , the supplier has 3 years of Gold Supplier history, supports Trade Assurance, and carries tags such as “Warranty available,” “Low MOQ for customization,” and “Finished product inspection.” Business activity is also relatively strong, with 200+ orders and CN¥1.4M+ transaction value in the past six months. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking mid-to-large-volume customized packaging products with platform-backed transaction protection. Key limitations include limited review volume and insufficient data on full customization capability.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory area: 33,000+㎡
• Employees: 140+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Factory province: Sichuan, China

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a relatively strong physical production base based on the reported factory size and workforce. A factory area exceeding 33,000㎡ indicates substantial operating space, which is generally supportive of organized production, warehousing, and order handling. The employee count of over 140 staff suggests a medium-sized manufacturing operation with capacity beyond a small workshop level.

The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s operational claims, although the data does not provide specific details on the scope of the verification, such as audited production lines, machinery lists, or annual production capacity.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier fits between a medium-sized stable factory and a larger-scale supply base. The large factory area is a positive indicator, while the staff size of 140+ is solid but not enough on its own to classify the company as a very large-scale manufacturer. Since verified supplier status is present, the production capability appears more credible than an unverified supplier. However, because detailed production capacity, equipment information, and factory audit documents are not provided, a maximum score is not justified.

Final Score

18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Warranty available
• Low MOQ for customization
• Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. Being a Gold Supplier for 3 years shows a basic track record on , while Trade Assurance support provides buyers with transaction-level protection. Verified supplier status further improves platform credibility.

The available tags also indicate some buyer-oriented compliance and service features, especially “Finished product inspection,” which is relevant to quality control. However, the data does not show additional formal factory certifications, international management certifications, product compliance certificates, or third-party audit details.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. These are positive and reduce procurement risk compared with suppliers lacking platform validation. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 3 years, which is credible but not long-term, and the certification information is limited to platform/industry tags rather than detailed compliance documents. Therefore, the supplier should be rated as having a good but not fully comprehensive credibility profile.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 200+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1.4M+
• Store rating: 4.9 / 5.0
• Reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier has shown active recent business performance on the platform. More than 200 orders in the past six months indicates consistent buyer activity, and CN¥1.4M+ transaction value suggests that the supplier is not only receiving small trial orders but also generating meaningful commercial volume.

The store rating of 4.9 is strong and indicates positive buyer satisfaction based on available platform feedback. However, the number of reviews is only 20+, which is relatively limited compared with the order volume. This means that while the rating is high, the feedback sample size is not large enough to fully validate long-term consistency across many customers.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 200+ recent orders and CN¥1.4M+ transaction value reflects strong short-term commercial validation. The 4.9 rating further supports a positive business performance assessment. The only limiting factor is the relatively modest review count, which prevents assigning a near-perfect score. Overall, the supplier demonstrates high recent activity and good buyer acceptance.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Low MOQ for customization: Provided as platform tag
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of within 3 hours is acceptable and indicates a reasonable level of communication responsiveness. The platform tag “Low MOQ for customization” suggests that the supplier is open to customized orders at relatively accessible minimum order quantities. This is relevant for buyers sourcing custom printed paper bags, luxury packaging bags, and similar packaging products.

However, the data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization.” There is no detailed information on design support, sampling process, artwork handling, material customization, structure customization, or private-label development capabilities.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates normal-to-good service responsiveness and some customization support. However, because response time is not within 1 hour and full customization capability is not directly confirmed, the supplier should not receive a top-tier service score. The available evidence supports a moderate-to-good service capability rating.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 95.0%

Elaboration

A 95.0% on-time delivery rate is a strong delivery performance indicator. Based on the scoring standard, any rate above 90% falls into the highest scoring range. This suggests that the supplier has demonstrated reliable shipment execution on the platform.

The provided data does not include average lead time, production cycle, peak-season delivery performance, or delay dispute records. Therefore, the evaluation is limited strictly to the reported on-time shipment rate.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s 95.0% on-time delivery rate meets the highest performance bracket. While additional delivery data would be useful for deeper risk assessment, the available metric is strong and supports a high score.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9 / 5.0
• Reviews: 20+
• Finished product inspection: Provided as platform tag
• Verified supplier: True
• Factory Verification: Insufficient Data as a specific separate item

Elaboration

The supplier’s store rating of 4.9 is a positive quality signal, showing that buyers who left feedback generally had a favorable experience. The “Finished product inspection” tag is also important, as it indicates that final inspection is part of the supplier’s stated quality process.

Verified supplier status adds further confidence, although the data does not specify whether this includes a formal factory verification report or detailed audit coverage. The review count of 20+ is useful but not extensive, meaning customer feedback is positive but still based on a limited visible sample.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a strong rating, some customer feedback, finished product inspection, and supplier verification. These factors support a good quality confidence level. However, the limited number of reviews and insufficient specific data on Factory Verification prevent a top-tier score. The quality profile appears positive, but buyers should still request samples and confirm inspection standards before placing larger orders.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with standard pre-order verification.

Lvsen Pakeng Technology (Chengdu) Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing customized packaging products such as paper bags, luxury packaging bags, jewelry paper bags, coffee cups, and disposable cup-related products, based on the listed product data. The supplier is especially suitable for buyers requiring moderate-to-large order quantities, with MOQs ranging from 1,000 to 5,000 pieces.

Suitable customer types:
- Importers sourcing customized packaging products
- Brand owners requiring printed packaging bags
- Distributors purchasing paper packaging or cup-related products
- Buyers seeking Trade Assurance protection

Main risk points:
- Full customization capability is not clearly confirmed.
- Review volume is limited at 20+, despite strong order activity.
- Specific factory audit details and formal Factory Verification data are insufficient.
- No detailed production capacity, machinery, lead time, or certification documents are provided.

Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong recent transaction activity, a high store rating, reliable on-time delivery, and a sizeable factory base. If it can provide more detailed audit documents, quality-control procedures, customization workflow, and certification evidence, its procurement attractiveness could improve further.