Ningbo Peichen Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Ningbo Peichen Electric Appliance Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Ningbo Peichen Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with reported factory space of 4,300+㎡ and 70+ staff. The company presents itself as an audited supplier and has a long-standing Gold Supplier history of 14 years, supported by Trade Assurance and a strong on-time delivery rate of 98.1%. Its listed products are mainly small electric appliances, including portable and household juicer-related items, with low MOQs ranging from 1 to 30 pieces, which may suit trial orders, small-batch buyers, and cross-border e-commerce purchasers.

Commercially, the supplier shows solid recent platform performance, with 400+ orders and CN¥2M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.5 store rating and 200+ reviews. Key limitations include insufficient data on customization capability, finished product inspection, and detailed factory certifications beyond audited supplier status. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified platform credibility, flexible order quantities, and stable delivery performance.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 4,300+㎡
• Employees: 70+ staff
• Audited supplier: True
• Product listings include juicer-related small electric appliances and other listed appliance products.

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined physical manufacturing base with a reported factory area exceeding 4,300㎡ and a workforce of more than 70 staff. This indicates a moderate production setup rather than a very large-scale industrial operation. The audited supplier status provides an additional layer of factory credibility, suggesting that the company has passed at least some form of supplier or factory verification on the platform.

The available data supports the view that the company has basic-to-medium manufacturing capacity, especially for small electric appliance products. However, the provided information does not include annual output, production line count, machinery details, R&D team size, or detailed factory certification records. Therefore, while the company appears stable, its scale cannot be classified as a large-scale supply chain operation based only on the available data.

Scoring Rationale

A factory size of 4,300+㎡ and 70+ staff places the supplier in the medium-small to medium manufacturing category. The audited supplier status strengthens confidence in its operational legitimacy, but the absence of detailed production capacity data prevents a higher score. The company demonstrates more than basic capability, but there is insufficient evidence to classify it as a large-scale stable supply chain provider.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier history: 14 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Audited supplier: True
• Platform tags: “On-time delivery 98.1%”, “Response time ≤11h”
• Other compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile, primarily supported by its 14-year Gold Supplier history. A long Gold Supplier duration generally indicates sustained platform presence and a stable operating record on . Trade Assurance support also improves buyer protection during transactions, especially for payment security and order fulfillment disputes.

The audited supplier status further supports supplier credibility. The available platform tags also provide measurable operational indicators, including on-time delivery and response time. However, the data does not provide details on independent product certifications, industry-specific compliance approvals, or a full list of factory audit standards. As a result, the supplier’s platform credibility is strong, but broader regulatory or product compliance depth cannot be fully verified from the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several key credibility indicators: long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, audited supplier status, and measurable platform performance tags. The 14-year platform history is particularly strong. The only limiting factor is the lack of detailed certification data beyond platform-level verification and tags. Therefore, the supplier deserves a high score, though not a perfect one.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past six months: 400+
• Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥2M+
• Store rating: 4.5
• Reviews: 200+

Elaboration

The supplier shows solid recent commercial performance on the platform. More than 400 orders within six months indicates active buyer engagement and repeated transaction activity. A transaction value above CN¥2M during the same period suggests meaningful sales volume rather than only small sample orders.

The store rating of 4.5 is positive, though not exceptionally high. The review count of 200+ provides a reasonable customer feedback base, making the rating more commercially meaningful than a score supported by only a small number of reviews. Overall, the supplier demonstrates validated market activity and stable platform sales performance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s order volume and transaction value are both strong for recent six-month performance. The 4.5 rating is acceptable and supported by 200+ reviews, but it leaves some room for improvement compared with suppliers maintaining higher ratings. Given the combination of high order activity, significant transaction value, and adequate review volume, the supplier fits the “high commercial validation” category, though not at the absolute top level.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤11h
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data
• Other customization capability: Insufficient Data
• Communication efficiency details beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as ≤11 hours, which indicates that the supplier is responsive within the same business day or within a reasonable timeframe. However, this is not equivalent to fast-response suppliers with response times of one hour or less. For buyers requiring rapid quotation cycles, urgent sampling, or high-frequency communication, this response level may be acceptable but not premium.

The available data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, packaging customization, logo customization, or engineering customization. Since customization capability is a core part of service evaluation, the lack of data limits the score. The supplier can be considered service-capable at a basic to moderate level, but stronger service capability is not verifiable from the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is reasonable but not fast enough to qualify for the highest service tier. More importantly, customization capability is not confirmed. Because the scoring standard requires evaluation of both response speed and customization support, the absence of customization data materially limits the score. The supplier receives a moderate score based on acceptable response time but cannot be rated highly without confirmed customization services.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 98.1%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 98.1%, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. According to the scoring standard, a rate above 90% qualifies for the highest delivery performance range. This suggests that the supplier has demonstrated reliable order fulfillment timing on the platform.

A high delivery rate is especially relevant for cross-border e-commerce buyers, small-batch purchasers, and buyers with inventory replenishment cycles. However, the data does not include average production lead time, shipping method performance, peak season delivery stability, or order-size-specific delivery records. Therefore, while the available delivery indicator is excellent, deeper logistics performance details remain unavailable.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s 98.1% on-time delivery rate clearly exceeds the 90% benchmark for top-tier delivery scoring. Although additional logistics data is not provided, the available metric is direct, measurable, and strong. Based on the defined scoring rules, this dimension warrants a near-full or full score.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.5
• Reviews: 200+
• Audited supplier / factory verification: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Other quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.5 store rating with more than 200 reviews, which provides a meaningful customer feedback base. The rating indicates generally positive buyer satisfaction, although it is not at the highest level. The audited supplier status supports quality credibility from a factory verification perspective, but it does not fully substitute for detailed quality management certifications or finished product inspection data.

The absence of Finished Product Inspection information is a notable limitation. There is also no provided data on product defect rate, warranty terms, quality control procedures, testing equipment, or specific product compliance certifications. As the listed products include electric appliance items, quality control visibility would be important for buyers, but such details are not available in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a solid rating and a meaningful number of reviews, supported by audited supplier status. However, the 4.5 score is good rather than excellent, and the lack of Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality certification data prevents the supplier from reaching the top quality tier. The score reflects a generally credible quality profile with some information gaps.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation

Recommended for cooperation, especially for trial orders, small-batch purchasing, and cross-border e-commerce sourcing.

Suitable Buyer Types

• Buyers seeking suppliers with long-term platform credibility
• Cross-border e-commerce sellers requiring low MOQ product sourcing
• Importers looking for small electric appliance suppliers with visible transaction history
• Buyers prioritizing reliable on-time delivery performance
• Purchasers who want Trade Assurance protection for initial cooperation

Main Risk Points

1. Customization capability is unclear
   Full Customization, OEM, ODM, logo customization, and packaging customization are not confirmed in the provided data.

2. Quality control details are incomplete
   Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, defect rates, and detailed quality certifications are not provided.

3. Factory scale is moderate, not large-scale
   The supplier has 4,300+㎡ factory space and 70+ staff, which supports stable basic production, but there is insufficient data to confirm large-scale production capacity.

4. Store rating is good but not top-tier
   A 4.5 rating with 200+ reviews is commercially meaningful, but buyers should still review negative feedback and sample quality before bulk ordering.

Growth Potential

The supplier has strong platform maturity, 14 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, active recent transaction performance, and excellent on-time delivery data. If it can provide clearer evidence of customization capability, finished product inspection, and product compliance documentation, its suitability for larger or more demanding procurement programs would improve significantly.