Ningbo Haojia Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Ningbo Haojia Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. is a China-based home appliance supplier located in Zhejiang, with reported factory resources of 62,000+ m² and 410+ staff. The company shows strong production-side fundamentals and is marked as a verified supplier, indicating a relatively solid manufacturing base for volume-oriented procurement. Its platform credibility is also strong, supported by 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and labels including warranty availability, OEM for well-known brands, finished product inspection, and ODM service availability. Commercial performance is mixed: the reported transaction value over the past six months is high at CN¥31.1M+, but order count is only 10+, store rating is 3.3, and review count is 0. Delivery performance is excellent with a 100.0% on-time shipping rate. This supplier appears most suitable for buyers seeking established manufacturing capacity and platform-backed transactions, while quality perception and customer feedback visibility require further verification before large-scale procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
Factory area is 62,000+ m², employee count is 410+ staff, and the supplier is marked as a verified supplier.

Elaboration:
The reported factory size and workforce indicate a sizeable manufacturing operation rather than a small trading-oriented supplier. A 62,000+ m² facility and 410+ staff suggest the company may be capable of handling medium to large production runs, especially for standardized home appliance products. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and operational scale of the company.

Scoring Rationale:
Based on the available data, this supplier fits the profile of a large-scale and stable production-side partner. The combination of substantial factory area, significant employee base, and supplier verification supports a high score. However, no additional factory audit details, production line count, annual capacity, or specific factory certification documents are provided, so the score should not reach the absolute maximum.

Final Score: 19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
Gold Supplier status is True, Gold Supplier history is 9 years, Trade Assurance is True, and listed tags include “Warranty available,” “OEM for well-known brands,” “Finished product inspection,” and “ODM service available.”

Elaboration:
The supplier has a long platform operating history, which strengthens platform credibility. Trade Assurance provides transaction-level protection, while the listed tags show several commercial and compliance-related signals, including warranty support, OEM capability, finished product inspection, and ODM service availability.

Scoring Rationale:
A 9-year Gold Supplier history combined with Trade Assurance represents a strong platform credibility profile. The certification and capability labels are relatively complete for procurement screening purposes. However, the data does not provide named third-party certifications, detailed audit reports, or specific compliance standards, so the rating remains high but not perfect.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
Past six-month order volume is 10+, transaction value is CN¥31.1M+, store rating is 3.3, and review count is 0.

Elaboration:
The transaction amount is notably high, suggesting meaningful commercial activity on the platform. However, the order count is relatively limited at 10+, which may indicate fewer but higher-value transactions. The store rating of 3.3 is not strong, and the absence of reviews limits the ability to validate buyer satisfaction through public feedback.

Scoring Rationale:
The high transaction value supports a moderate-to-good business performance score, but the low order count, low-to-moderate store rating, and zero reviews weaken the commercial validation. The supplier has proven transaction activity, but customer-side performance evidence is not sufficiently strong to justify a high score.

Final Score: 14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
Communication response time is reported as ≤10h. ODM service is listed as available. Full Customization support is not provided in the data.

Elaboration:
A response time within 10 hours indicates the supplier is reachable, but it does not qualify as highly responsive under the ≤1 hour benchmark. ODM availability suggests some product development or adaptation capability, but the dataset does not confirm Full Customization support.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates basic service capability through acceptable response speed and ODM service availability. However, the lack of Full Customization data and the response time being significantly longer than one hour prevent a top-tier service score.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
On-time shipping rate is 100.0%.

Elaboration:
The reported delivery metric is excellent and indicates that completed shipments have met the stated delivery schedule. This is a strong operational signal for procurement buyers concerned with fulfillment reliability.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipping rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier reports 100.0%, it deserves the maximum score for this dimension based on the available data.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
Store rating is 3.3, review count is 0, “Finished product inspection” is listed, and the supplier is marked as verified.

Elaboration:
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, particularly finished product inspection and supplier verification. These are positive signs for basic quality control. However, customer feedback visibility is weak because the review count is 0, and the store rating of 3.3 does not indicate strong customer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale:
The presence of finished product inspection and verification supports a baseline quality assurance score. Nevertheless, the lack of reviews and modest store rating create uncertainty around actual customer experience and product consistency. Therefore, the score should remain in the mid-range rather than high.

Final Score: 13 / 20

Total Score

81 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Ningbo Haojia Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking established home appliance manufacturing capacity, Trade Assurance protection, ODM availability, and reliable delivery performance. The supplier is especially relevant for volume-oriented buyers that prioritize factory scale and platform credibility.

Key risks include weak customer feedback visibility, 0 reviews, a 3.3 store rating, and insufficient data on Full Customization capability, detailed factory certifications, production capacity, and third-party quality audits. Before placing large orders, buyers should request product samples, inspection reports, factory audit documents, and clarification on customization scope. Growth potential is supported by strong factory scale, long Gold Supplier history, and high transaction value, but customer satisfaction evidence requires further validation.