Ningbo Kajafa Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Ningbo Kajafa Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 58,000+ m² and 170+ staff. The supplier appears to focus on electric household blender, juicer, baby food maker, smoothie maker, and hand blender products, with listed MOQ levels generally at 1,000 units/sets/pieces. Based on the provided data, the company shows relatively strong manufacturing scale, verified supplier status, 7 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and 100.0% on-time delivery performance. Commercially, the supplier has recorded 10+ orders and CN¥14.8M+ transaction value in the past six months, indicating meaningful transaction value but limited visible order count and only 3 customer reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking mid-to-large-volume sourcing of small electric kitchen appliances, especially where factory scale, platform credibility, and delivery reliability are important. Key limitations are limited review volume, response time of ≤3h rather than ≤1h, and insufficient data on customization depth and finished product inspection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 58,000+ m²
- Employees: 170+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
- Product scope shown: household blender, juicer, baby food maker, smoothie maker, hand blender

Elaboration
The supplier has a sizeable reported factory footprint and a workforce of more than 170 staff, which indicates a relatively established production base. The factory area is notably large for a small electric appliance supplier, supporting the view that the company has meaningful production infrastructure. The presence of verified supplier status further strengthens confidence that the company has undergone some form of platform or factory-related verification.

Scoring Rationale
The factory scale is strong, and the employee count supports stable production capability. However, the employee base is not exceptionally large, and the provided data does not include detailed production lines, annual capacity, equipment lists, or factory certification documents. Therefore, the company fits between a medium-to-large stable factory rather than a fully evidenced top-tier large-scale supply chain.

Final Score
18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile, supported by 7 years as a Gold Supplier and availability of Trade Assurance. Verified supplier status adds another credibility layer. The listed platform tags also provide evidence of operational performance, particularly response time and delivery reliability.

Scoring Rationale
Seven years of Gold Supplier history is a meaningful indicator of platform continuity. Trade Assurance and verified supplier status are important compliance and transaction-safety signals. However, the provided certification labels are limited and do not include detailed factory certificates, product compliance certifications, or third-party audit documents. As a result, the platform credibility is strong but not fully complete from a compliance documentation perspective.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 10+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥14.8M+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 3

Elaboration
The supplier shows a high transaction value over the past six months, which suggests that order sizes may be commercially meaningful. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the low review count limits the statistical strength of the rating. The order count of 10+ indicates active transactions, though not a very high order frequency based on the provided data.

Scoring Rationale
The CN¥14.8M+ transaction value is a strong commercial signal and supports confidence in actual buyer activity. However, only 10+ orders and 3 reviews create a gap between transaction value and visible customer validation. The supplier demonstrates solid business performance, but the limited number of reviews prevents a top-tier score.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of ≤3h indicates acceptable communication speed for B2B sourcing, though it does not reach the strongest benchmark of ≤1h. The product listing includes one item described as “Customized Power,” but this alone is not sufficient evidence of full customization capability. No explicit data confirms OEM/ODM scope, packaging customization, private label support, engineering support, or design customization.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is reasonable and supports basic service capability. However, because Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed and broader service details are missing, the supplier should not receive a high score in this dimension. The score reflects adequate but not strongly evidenced service capability.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery-related data point provided. This directly supports confidence in shipment punctuality within the observed platform record.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier deserves a top score in this category. No negative delivery data is provided.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 3
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True, based on provided verified supplier / factory audit status

Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect store rating of 5.0, which is positive, but the rating is supported by only 3 reviews. This limits the reliability of customer feedback as a broad quality indicator. Verified supplier status provides some quality and credibility support, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, defect rates, quality certifications, or inspection reports.

Scoring Rationale
The available quality indicators are favorable but limited. A 5.0 rating is strong, and verified supplier status improves confidence. However, the small review base and lack of confirmed finished product inspection prevent the supplier from reaching the 18–20 range. The quality profile appears acceptable, but customer feedback depth is insufficient.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

84 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled qualification steps. Ningbo Kajafa Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking medium-to-large-volume sourcing of electric household kitchen appliances, especially buyers prioritizing factory scale, platform credibility, Trade Assurance, and reliable delivery performance.

The main risks are limited customer review volume, only 10+ visible orders in the past six months, insufficient data on Full Customization, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection. Before placing large or repeated orders, buyers should request product compliance documents, inspection procedures, sample evaluation, packaging/customization confirmation, and order-specific quality control terms.

The supplier shows good growth potential due to its large factory area, verified supplier status, 7-year Gold Supplier history, strong transaction value, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate.