Ningbo Shuaiwei Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Ningbo Shuaiwei Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of over 86,000㎡ and more than 740 staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to have substantial manufacturing scale and a verified supplier status, making it potentially suitable for buyers seeking large-volume electric iron-related products with OEM, ODM, and full customization support. The supplier also holds Gold Supplier status for 4 years, supports Trade Assurance, and lists quality-related platform tags such as Finished Product Inspection. However, its recent commercial performance is weak based on the available data: only 3 orders and CN¥676.8+ transaction value in the past six months, with 0 reviews and no available store rating. Delivery performance is also a notable concern, with an on-time dispatch rate of 66.7%. Overall, this supplier shows strong production capacity and platform credibility, but commercial validation, customer feedback, and delivery reliability require careful verification before large-scale cooperation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 86,000+㎡
- Employees: 740+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Zhejiang, China

Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates a large physical manufacturing footprint and a sizeable workforce. A factory area above 86,000㎡ and more than 740 employees indicate strong production infrastructure compared with small or limited-capacity suppliers. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of formal factory-level credibility within the provided platform data.

Scoring Rationale:
The company fits the profile of a large-scale supplier with stable production resources. The combination of factory size, employee count, and verified supplier status supports a high score. However, the provided data does not include detailed production capacity figures, annual output, equipment list, or factory audit reports, so the score is not set at the absolute maximum.

Final Score: 19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Finished product inspection, OEM for well-known brands, ODM service available, Full customization

Elaboration:
The supplier has core platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance support. The 4-year Gold Supplier history provides a moderate track record on the platform. The listed tags also suggest platform-recognized operational and customization capabilities.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a relatively complete platform credibility profile, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and relevant service or inspection tags. The 4-year tenure is positive but not long enough to be considered a very long-term platform record. Therefore, it qualifies as a credible supplier with solid but not top-tier platform history.

Final Score: 17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 3
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥676.8+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0

Elaboration:
The recent transaction record is limited. Only 3 orders and CN¥676.8+ transaction value over the past six months indicate low visible trading activity on the platform. The absence of store rating data and the lack of customer reviews reduce the ability to validate buyer satisfaction or repeat commercial performance.

Scoring Rationale:
Although the supplier has visible transaction activity, the order count and transaction value are both low. The lack of reviews and missing store rating significantly weaken commercial verification. This dimension is therefore scored below the medium range because business performance cannot be strongly validated from the provided data.

Final Score: 8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤7h
- Full customization: Listed in platform tags

Elaboration:
The supplier provides a response time within 7 hours, which indicates acceptable but not highly rapid communication. The presence of Full Customization suggests the supplier can support tailored buyer requirements, although the data does not specify customization scope, sample lead time, design capability, or engineering support.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows basic-to-good service capability due to full customization availability and reasonable response time. However, the response time is not within the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour, and there is insufficient data on communication quality or project management efficiency.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time dispatch rate: 66.7%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is below 70%, which is a material concern for procurement planning. For buyers requiring stable delivery windows, this figure suggests potential risk in shipment scheduling or order execution reliability.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the required scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate below 70% should receive less than 5 points. Since the reported rate is 66.7%, delivery performance is assessed as weak and requires further confirmation before placing time-sensitive or large-volume orders.

Final Score: 4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Factory Verification / Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has quality-related platform indicators, including Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. These are positive signs of basic quality assurance structure. However, there are no customer reviews and no available store rating, which limits the ability to assess actual buyer satisfaction or product consistency based on customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has some quality assurance signals, but customer feedback is insufficient. The absence of reviews and missing rating prevent a strong quality confidence assessment. Therefore, the supplier receives a moderate-low score: better than suppliers with no quality indicators, but below suppliers with strong customer validation.

Final Score: 12 / 20

Total Score

67 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Ningbo Shuaiwei Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking large-scale manufacturing capacity, OEM/ODM support, and customized electric iron products, especially where factory scale and platform credibility are important. However, buyers should proceed cautiously due to low recent transaction volume, 0 reviews, missing store rating data, and weak on-time dispatch performance of 66.7%.

Recommended actions before cooperation include requesting factory audit documents, product inspection reports, recent export or order references, sample testing, and written delivery commitments. The supplier’s main strengths are manufacturing scale, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and customization capability. The main risks are limited commercial validation, insufficient customer feedback, and delivery reliability. Growth potential exists if the supplier can improve platform transaction activity, accumulate buyer reviews, and raise its on-time dispatch rate.