zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Foshan Shunde Jinbu Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Foshan Shunde Jinbu Plastic Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering PVC car leather, faux leather rolls, synthetic leather fabric, and PVC leather products with a stated MOQ of 1,000 meters. The company shows a moderate production foundation, supported by a factory area of 10,000+㎡, 50+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, with 5 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and listed capability tags including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. However, its recent business performance is weak based on the provided data: only 1 order in the past six months, CN¥135.2+ transaction value, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. Delivery data is positive at 100.0% on-time shipment, but this is based on limited commercial evidence. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking customizable PVC/faux leather materials, but cooperation should start with sample validation and small trial orders.

Foshan Shunde Jinbu Plastic Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company: Foshan Shunde Jinbu Plastic Co., Ltd.
  • Country/Province: China, Guangdong
  • Factory area: 10,000+㎡
  • Staff size: 50+ staff
  • Verified/audited supplier: True
  • Product scope provided: PVC car leather, faux leather rolls, synthetic leather fabric, PVC leather for car seat cover applications

Elaboration

The supplier has a stated factory area of over 10,000㎡, which indicates a meaningful physical production base. The staff size of 50+ suggests the company is not a very large-scale manufacturer, but it has enough personnel to support basic manufacturing, order handling, and customization-related operations. The verified supplier status strengthens the credibility of its factory presence, although no additional factory certification names, production line count, machinery details, annual capacity, or export volume data were provided.

The product listings are concentrated around PVC/faux leather and automotive leather-related materials, which suggests a focused product category rather than a broad unrelated catalog. This is positive for specialization, but the available data does not provide enough detail to evaluate advanced manufacturing capability, technical process control, or capacity scalability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates a stable mid-sized production profile due to its 10,000+㎡ factory area, 50+ staff, and verified supplier status. However, the staff size is not large, and the data lacks specific information on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, factory certifications, or major operational scale indicators. Therefore, it should not be scored as a large-scale mature supply chain, but it fits the category of a medium stable factory with basic manufacturing capability.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified/audited supplier: True
  • Certification/industry tags:
  • Finished Product Inspection
  • ODM service available
  • Full customization
  • Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively complete platform credibility profile. A 5-year Gold Supplier history indicates platform continuity and a certain degree of operating stability on . Trade Assurance support provides an additional transaction protection mechanism for buyers. The verified/audited supplier status further improves credibility, as it indicates that some level of supplier verification has been completed.

The listed tags also support compliance and service credibility. Finished Product Inspection is relevant to quality control, while ODM, Full Customization, and Minor Customization indicate that the supplier presents itself as capable of supporting different buyer requirements. However, the data does not include internationally recognized product certifications, management system certifications, test reports, or third-party audit details. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, broader compliance evidence remains partially insufficient.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has most core platform trust elements: 5-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and several relevant capability labels. These factors justify a high score. The reason it does not receive a perfect score is that the provided data does not include detailed factory audit reports, ISO certifications, automotive material compliance documents, chemical safety certifications, or other external compliance records.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 1
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥135.2+
  • Store rating: Insufficient Data
  • Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The business performance data is weak. Only one order is recorded in the past six months, and the transaction value is very low at CN¥135.2+. This indicates limited recent transaction activity on the platform. In addition, there is no available store rating, and the review count is 0, meaning there is no visible customer feedback base to support commercial validation.

The lack of rating and review information makes it difficult to assess buyer satisfaction, repeat purchase behavior, dispute history, or market acceptance through platform evidence. While the company may have offline business or other sales channels, such information was not provided and therefore cannot be used in this evaluation.

Scoring Rationale

Based strictly on the provided data, the supplier has insufficient commercial validation. One order and a very small transaction amount over six months do not demonstrate strong market traction. The absence of store rating and customer reviews further weakens business credibility. This dimension therefore falls below the basic commercial confidence level.

Final Score

5 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Full customization: Listed as available
  • Minor customization: Listed as available
  • ODM service: Listed as available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours is acceptable for B2B sourcing communication, although it does not meet the highest benchmark of response within 1 hour. The availability of Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service suggests that the supplier may support customized product requirements, which is important for PVC/faux leather buyers who may need adjustments in texture, color, thickness, surface finish, or application suitability. However, the provided data does not specify the exact customization scope, sample lead time, engineering support, design capability, or minimum customization requirements.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has good service indicators because it responds within a reasonable time and lists multiple customization-related capabilities. However, since the response time is not ≤1 hour and there is no detailed evidence about customization execution capacity, it should be rated as good rather than excellent.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The stated on-time shipment rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest available delivery indicator in the provided data. According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for the highest score range.

However, this result should be interpreted carefully because the supplier’s recent platform transaction volume is very limited, with only one order in the past six months. Therefore, while the percentage is excellent, the sample size behind the performance appears small based on the available business performance data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets the highest delivery-performance benchmark with a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. Despite the limited recent order evidence, the scoring rule is based directly on the on-time shipment percentage, so the supplier qualifies for a top score in this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Finished Product Inspection: Listed
  • Verified/audited supplier: True
  • Store rating: Insufficient Data
  • Number of reviews: 0
  • Product category: PVC/faux leather and synthetic leather fabric products

Elaboration

The supplier has some positive quality-control indicators. Finished Product Inspection is listed, which suggests that finished goods inspection is part of the supplier’s presented quality assurance profile. The verified/audited supplier status also adds a level of confidence regarding supplier legitimacy and operational verification.

However, customer feedback evidence is very limited. No store rating is provided, and the review count is 0. As a result, there is no buyer-side confirmation of product consistency, defect rate, delivery quality, after-sales handling, or long-term satisfaction. The data also does not include product test reports, material compliance documents, quality certifications, inspection standards, or detailed QC procedures. For PVC/faux leather products, these missing details are important because buyers may need to evaluate durability, surface performance, color fastness, odor, thickness tolerance, and application suitability, but no such data was provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic quality assurance signals through Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. However, the absence of store rating and customer reviews significantly limits quality confidence. The supplier should therefore be scored in the middle-low range: better than suppliers with no quality indicators, but not strong enough to be considered highly validated by customer feedback.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 5 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 12 / 20
Total Score 69 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Foshan Shunde Jinbu Plastic Co., Ltd. can be considered for cooperation, but only under a controlled procurement approach. The supplier has a solid platform credibility profile, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, 5-year Gold Supplier history, acceptable factory scale, and listed customization capability. These factors make it potentially suitable for buyers sourcing PVC car leather, faux leather rolls, synthetic leather fabric, or related PVC leather materials with MOQ tolerance around 1,000 meters.

However, the main risk is weak commercial validation. The supplier has only 1 order in the past six months, CN¥135.2+ transaction value, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. This creates uncertainty around actual customer satisfaction, repeat order performance, and large-order execution reliability.

Recommended procurement approach: - Start with sample testing before bulk purchase.
- Use Trade Assurance for payment protection.
- Request product specifications, inspection standards, and material test reports before order confirmation.
- Place a small trial order before scaling up.
- Confirm customization scope, lead time, packaging, and delivery terms in writing.

Overall, the supplier shows good platform credibility and basic manufacturing capability, but its limited transaction and feedback history require cautious onboarding.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Foshan Shunde District Lecong Town Sanju Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde District Lecong Town Sanju Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Baifuli Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Baifuli Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Zhenghe Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Zhenghe Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Saiyu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Saiyu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Goldmine Fittings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Goldmine Fittings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Leliu Geagood Electrical Factory Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Leliu Geagood Electrical Factory Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Shengzhan Digital Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Shengzhan Digital Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Xichu Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Xichu Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Juke Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Juke Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Deco Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Deco Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Leguwe Plastics Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Leguwe Plastics Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Jnod Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Jnod Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Dmais Electrical And Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Dmais Electrical And Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Xingtan Taicheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Xingtan Taicheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Ronggui Aigao Foam Rubber Products Factory Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Ronggui Aigao Foam Rubber Products Factory Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Chenke Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Chenke Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qisheng Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qisheng Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Haobike Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Haobike Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hongzhu Plastic Hardware Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hongzhu Plastic Hardware Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Meker Hvac Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Meker Hvac Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Quanzhou Jdk Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Jdk Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Chame Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Chame Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Lead Mining Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Lead Mining Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chelaiwang Automotive Parts Co., Ltd, Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chelaiwang Automotive Parts Co., Ltd, Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Wuxing Grinding Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Wuxing Grinding Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Yuanchen Metal Products Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Yuanchen Metal Products Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Boromond Ept Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Boromond Ept Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shangqiu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shangqiu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Haofeng Magnet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Haofeng Magnet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Faw Trucks International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Faw Trucks International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Newjiake (Chongqing) Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Newjiake (Chongqing) Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Sw Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Sw Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yilang Technology Yancheng Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yilang Technology Yancheng Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Zhongda Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Zhongda Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Xinlida Auto Interior Decoration Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Xinlida Auto Interior Decoration Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Nicrolandee Arts & Craft Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Nicrolandee Arts & Craft Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Tongsheng Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Tongsheng Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Uwin Import And Export Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Uwin Import And Export Limited Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Deyuanxin Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Deyuanxin Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026