Foshan Qisheng Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Foshan Qisheng Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based Chinese supplier focused on plastic cosmetic and skincare packaging products, including airless cosmetic syringes, skincare packaging sets, customized plastic bottles, HDPE containers, and PET packaging items. Based on the provided data, the company shows a solid manufacturing foundation with a factory area of over 15,000 sqm, more than 150 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 8 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, and Full Customization. Business activity appears stable, with over 80 orders and CN¥1.4M+ transaction value in the past six months, although the review count is still limited at 10+. The supplier is best suited for buyers seeking mid-to-large volume plastic cosmetic packaging with customization needs. Key strengths are platform credibility, delivery reliability, and production scale, while the main limitation is relatively limited customer feedback volume.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 15,000+ sqm
- Employee count: 150+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes multiple plastic packaging formats for cosmetic, skincare, HDPE, and PET packaging applications

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a relatively strong production base. A factory area exceeding 15,000 sqm and a workforce of more than 150 employees indicate that the company is beyond a small workshop-level operation and has the physical and human resources to support regular production. The presence of multiple listed plastic packaging product types also suggests operational coverage across different packaging structures and materials such as PS, PP, HDPE, and PET, based strictly on the product titles provided.

The verified supplier status further strengthens the company’s profile, as it indicates that the supplier has passed some form of platform or supplier verification. However, no specific factory audit report, ISO certification, production line count, monthly capacity, machinery list, or export market distribution is provided, so the assessment cannot confirm advanced manufacturing depth beyond the stated scale indicators.

Scoring Rationale
The company fits the profile of a medium-to-strong manufacturing supplier. Its 15,000+ sqm facility and 150+ staff suggest stable production capability, while verified supplier status adds credibility to its factory presence. It does not reach the highest possible score because the data does not provide detailed production capacity, equipment information, factory certification names, or formal quality management system certificates.

Final Score: 17/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification-related information: verified supplier status is True
- Certification/industry tags: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. Eight years as an Gold Supplier indicates long-term platform presence, while Trade Assurance provides buyers with an additional transaction protection mechanism. The verified supplier status also supports credibility from a platform compliance perspective.

The listed tags are commercially relevant, especially Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, and Full Customization. These labels indicate that the supplier’s platform profile includes both quality-related and customization-related service claims. However, the provided data does not include third-party certification names, audit institutions, certificate validity periods, or compliance documents. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, independent compliance depth cannot be fully verified from the available information.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier deserves a high score in this dimension because it combines long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a complete set of relevant platform tags. The score is kept slightly below the maximum because formal compliance certificates or detailed audit documentation are not provided.

Final Score: 19/20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past six months: 80+
- Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥1.4M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Review count: 10+

Elaboration
The supplier shows active commercial performance on the platform. More than 80 orders in six months indicates steady transaction activity, and CN¥1.4M+ in transaction value suggests a meaningful level of buyer demand. The 4.8 store rating is positive and indicates generally favorable buyer experience among reviewers.

However, the review count is only 10+, which limits the statistical strength of the rating. A high rating based on a relatively small review base is still useful but less conclusive than a similar rating supported by a larger number of reviews. The order and transaction data support commercial viability, but the feedback depth remains moderate.

Scoring Rationale
This supplier demonstrates stable business activity, with a reasonable order volume and transaction value over the past six months. The 4.8 rating supports positive buyer satisfaction, but the relatively low number of reviews prevents classification as a highly validated high-volume supplier. The appropriate score is therefore in the upper-middle range.

Final Score: 16/20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: available
- ODM service available
- Warranty available

Elaboration
The supplier provides several indicators of service capability. A response time of within three hours is acceptable for international procurement communication, although it does not meet the strongest benchmark of one hour or less. The availability of Full Customization and ODM service is important for buyers in cosmetic and skincare packaging, where product shape, capacity, color, decoration, and branding requirements are often project-specific.

Warranty availability also supports after-sales service positioning, although the exact warranty scope is not provided. The lack of detailed communication metrics, such as response rate, quotation turnaround time, sample lead time, or dedicated account management, limits the ability to assess service consistency in greater detail.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates good service capability because it supports customization and ODM services, with a reasonable response time of ≤3 hours. It does not qualify for the highest score band because the response time is not within one hour and detailed service process data is not provided.

Final Score: 8/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier’s delivery performance is very strong based on the provided data. A 100.0% on-time delivery rate places it in the highest scoring band for this dimension. For procurement buyers, this is a significant indicator because packaging components are often tied to filling schedules, product launches, and retail delivery timelines.

However, the data does not specify the number of shipments behind this metric, the measurement period, shipment destinations, or whether the rate applies to all orders or only platform-recorded transactions. Therefore, the score can be high, but the interpretation should remain limited to the provided on-time delivery figure.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score, with the caveat that shipment sample size is not disclosed.

Final Score: 10/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Review count: 10+
- Finished Product Inspection: available
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available

Elaboration
The supplier has positive quality-related indicators. A 4.8 store rating suggests that buyers have generally reported favorable experiences. Finished Product Inspection is a particularly relevant quality assurance tag because it indicates that completed goods can be inspected before delivery. Verified supplier status and warranty availability further support the supplier’s quality credibility.

The main limitation is the relatively small review count of 10+. While the rating is strong, the limited number of reviews reduces confidence in the consistency of quality performance across a broad customer base. No defect rate, inspection standard, AQL level, quality certificate, material compliance documentation, or customer complaint record is provided. Therefore, quality assurance appears credible but not fully evidenced at an advanced level.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier earns a solid score due to its high rating, Finished Product Inspection availability, verified supplier status, and warranty tag. The score is not placed in the top band because review volume is limited and detailed quality system documentation is not provided.

Final Score: 16/20

Total Score

• Company Strength: 17/20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19/20
• Business Performance: 16/20
• Service Capability: 8/10
• Delivery Performance: 10/10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 16/20

Total Score: 86/100

Procurement Recommendation

Foshan Qisheng Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. is recommended as a suitable supplier for further procurement engagement, especially for buyers requiring plastic cosmetic, skincare, PET, PP, PS, or HDPE packaging with ODM or full customization needs. The supplier is particularly suitable for mid-to-large volume buyers, as the listed MOQs range from 10,000 to 20,000 pieces and the factory scale indicates capacity beyond small-batch sourcing.

The main strengths are its 8-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 15,000+ sqm factory area, 150+ staff, 100.0% on-time delivery rate, and availability of Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization. These factors make it a credible candidate for packaging procurement projects requiring stable supply and customization support.

The primary risks are the limited review count of 10+, lack of disclosed formal quality certifications, absence of detailed production capacity data, and insufficient information on inspection standards or material compliance. Buyers should request samples, confirm customization capabilities, review quality inspection procedures, and clarify lead times before placing large-volume orders.

Overall, the supplier shows strong growth potential and a credible operating profile. Cooperation is recommended, with standard due diligence and sample validation before scaling to bulk procurement.