Tongcheng Jinlong Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Tongcheng Jinlong Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Tongcheng Jinlong Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Anhui, with a reported factory area of 4,600+㎡ and 20+ staff. The supplier shows a moderate production foundation supported by verified supplier status on the platform. Its listed products are PU leather multifunctional travel-use items, with low MOQ options ranging from 5 to 50 pieces, which may be suitable for buyers requiring small-batch purchasing or customization-oriented sourcing.

From a platform credibility perspective, the supplier demonstrates strong trust signals, including 9 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and platform tags such as Low MOQ for customization, ODM service available, and Full customization. Business performance is relatively solid, with 400+ orders and CN¥2.2M+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the company’s employee scale is limited, and some quality assurance data, such as Finished Product Inspection, is not provided. Overall, this supplier is suitable for small to medium-volume buyers seeking verified, customization-capable sourcing with moderate commercial validation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Country/Region: China
• Factory location: Anhui
• Factory area: 4,600+㎡
• Employees: 20+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory space of over 4,600㎡, which indicates a physical production base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. However, the employee count of 20+ staff suggests a relatively lean operational structure. This scale is more consistent with a small to lower-medium-sized production organization rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturer.

The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic operational capability of the company. However, the provided data does not include detailed production line quantity, monthly production capacity, machinery list, factory audit reports, or specific manufacturing certifications. Therefore, while the supplier appears to have a real and functional production base, its large-scale supply capability cannot be fully confirmed from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The company has a measurable factory area and verified supplier status, which supports a positive assessment of basic production capability. However, the staff size is limited, and there is insufficient data on production capacity, equipment, or formal factory certifications beyond verification status. This prevents the supplier from being classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. The score is therefore positioned in the upper range of “small but with basic production capability.”

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Low MOQ for customization
• ODM service available
• Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 9 years, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Long-term presence on a major B2B platform generally improves buyer confidence because it reflects continuity and platform-level supplier visibility. Trade Assurance support further strengthens transaction security by providing platform-backed order protection.

The supplier also carries platform tags related to customization and ODM service. These tags indicate that the supplier is positioned to serve buyers requiring product adaptation or private-label style procurement. However, the provided information does not include external compliance certificates, product safety certifications, social compliance audits, or detailed factory certification documentation. Therefore, platform credibility is strong, while independent compliance documentation remains insufficient based on the available data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs strongly in platform credibility due to 9 years of Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance availability, and verified customization-related tags. These are meaningful indicators for B2B sourcing reliability. The only limitation is the absence of detailed third-party compliance or product certification data. Given the long platform history and complete core trust mechanisms, the supplier deserves a high score.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 400+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥2.2M+
• Store rating: 4.6
• Number of reviews: 60+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 400 orders over the past six months, indicating active commercial engagement on the platform. A transaction value above CN¥2.2M during the same period suggests that the supplier has achieved a meaningful level of buyer conversion and sales execution.

The store rating of 4.6 is generally positive, although it is not at the very highest level. The review count of 60+ provides some customer feedback base, but it is not large enough to be considered extensive relative to highly mature platform suppliers. Overall, the business data shows that the supplier is not merely listed passively but has ongoing transaction activity and buyer interaction.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates stable commercial performance with 400+ recent orders and CN¥2.2M+ transaction value, which supports confidence in its market activity. The 4.6 rating is good but leaves some room for improvement, and the 60+ reviews provide moderate rather than extensive validation. This supports a score in the stable medium-to-strong range, but not the highest tier.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4h
• Platform tags include: Full customization, ODM service available, Low MOQ for customization

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international procurement inquiries. It is not at the fastest level of ≤1 hour, but it remains within a reasonable operating standard for supplier communication.

The presence of Full customization and ODM service tags suggests that the supplier can support customized procurement requirements. The Low MOQ for customization tag is also relevant for buyers who need product personalization without committing to large initial order quantities. However, the provided data does not include details on design support, sample development lead time, engineering capability, or customization case examples.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows solid service capability due to customization-related platform tags and a reasonable response time. However, because the response time is not within the top-tier ≤1 hour range and detailed service process data is not available, the supplier should not receive a maximum score. The service profile is suitable for basic to moderately customized sourcing needs.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 86.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 86.7%, which falls within the 80%–89% range. This indicates generally acceptable delivery performance, but not a consistently high-performance level. For buyers with flexible timelines or repeat procurement planning, this level may be manageable. However, for buyers with strict launch schedules, seasonal sales windows, or fixed delivery commitments, the current on-time delivery rate represents a point requiring attention.

No additional data is provided regarding average lead time, production cycle, shipping method, or historical delay reasons.

Scoring Rationale

Based on the defined scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 86.7%, the supplier is near the upper end of this band, supporting a score of 8. However, it does not reach the 90%+ threshold required for a top delivery score.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 60+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Supported by verified supplier status

Elaboration

The supplier’s store rating of 4.6 suggests generally positive customer satisfaction. The 60+ reviews provide a moderate level of buyer feedback, helping validate that the supplier has completed multiple platform transactions. Verified supplier status also contributes to confidence in the supplier’s basic operational legitimacy.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection. There is also no information on defect rate, quality control process, inspection reports, product testing standards, return rate, or customer complaint details. As a result, the supplier’s quality reliability can be considered reasonably supported by platform feedback, but not fully validated through documented inspection systems.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good rating and a moderate number of reviews, together with verified supplier status. These factors support a positive but not top-tier quality assessment. The absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and detailed QC documentation limits the score. Therefore, the supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance indicators” category rather than the “high rating, large review base, and complete quality system” category.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Tongcheng Jinlong Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking PU leather multifunctional travel-use products with low MOQ and customization requirements. The supplier is particularly appropriate for small to medium-volume purchasers, trial orders, customized product projects, and buyers who value Trade Assurance and long-term Gold Supplier credibility.

The supplier’s key strengths are its 9-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, active recent transaction performance, and customization-related platform tags. These factors make it a credible option for buyers requiring moderate sourcing reliability and flexible order quantities.

Main risks include limited employee scale, lack of disclosed production capacity, absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection data, and an on-time delivery rate of 86.7%, which is acceptable but not excellent. Buyers with strict delivery deadlines or high-volume production requirements should conduct additional verification before placing large orders.

Growth potential exists in its customization service positioning, low MOQ capability, and active platform sales performance. A recommended procurement approach would be to start with sample orders or small-to-medium trial orders, confirm quality consistency and lead time performance, and then scale cooperation based on actual fulfillment results.