zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based packaging supplier with a reported factory area of 2,500+ m² and 30+ staff. The company appears to operate as a small-to-lower-mid scale supplier with basic manufacturing capacity and supplier verification support. Its platform profile shows 2 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, fast response time of ≤1 hour, and an on-time delivery rate of 94.8%, indicating relatively credible platform compliance and strong delivery reliability. Business performance is moderate, with 90+ orders and CN¥405.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a high store rating of 4.9 but only 10 reviews. The supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking packaging products with relatively low MOQs and responsive communication. However, buyers should note the limited review base, modest factory scale, and insufficient data on finished product inspection, full customization capability, and detailed quality systems.

Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 2,500+ m²
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
- Product scope provided: packaging-related products with MOQs from 100 boxes to 500 pieces

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical manufacturing base with a reported factory area of over 2,500 m² and more than 30 employees. This indicates an operational production setup rather than a purely trading-oriented profile based on the data provided. The presence of verified supplier status strengthens confidence that the company has passed some form of platform or supplier validation. However, the factory size and staff count suggest a relatively small production organization compared with larger-scale packaging manufacturers. The data does not provide details on production lines, monthly capacity, equipment, warehouse scale, or export volume.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic production capability and a verified supplier status, which supports a positive assessment. However, the factory area and workforce size are not large enough to classify it as a large-scale stable supply chain. Since production capacity details are limited and no additional factory certifications are listed, the score should remain in the small-to-mid supplier range rather than the upper tier.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification status: supplier/factory verification indicated as True
- Certification / industry tags provided: “On-time delivery 94.8%”, “Response time ≤1h”

Elaboration
The supplier has several platform-level credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier information. Trade Assurance provides a stronger transactional framework for buyers, while verified supplier status improves baseline trust. The 2-year Gold Supplier duration is positive but still relatively short compared with long-established platform suppliers. The available tags mainly relate to operational performance, such as delivery and response time, rather than broader compliance certifications or industry-specific quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has core credibility elements in place, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, and the certification/tag data is not extensive. There is insufficient data on ISO certification, packaging-specific compliance, sustainability certification, or independent factory audit details. Therefore, the supplier fits the “core certifications available but relatively short platform history” category.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 90+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥405.6K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Number of reviews: 10

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 90 orders and over CN¥405.6K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active commercial performance and a certain level of buyer acceptance on the platform. The 4.9 store rating is strong, suggesting generally positive buyer satisfaction among those who reviewed the supplier. However, the review count is only 10, which limits the statistical confidence of the rating. The available transaction value is moderate rather than high, and the data does not include repeat purchase rate, buyer geography, major customer types, or category-level order distribution.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows stable but not high-volume business activity. Order quantity is reasonably active, and the transaction value demonstrates real platform sales. The high rating is favorable, but the limited review base prevents the score from reaching the top tier. Overall, the supplier falls into the stable medium-scale transaction category, with some limitations in review depth and commercial validation.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1 hour
- Platform tag: “Response time ≤1h”
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong responsiveness, with a stated response time of ≤1 hour. This is a positive indicator for procurement communication, especially during quotation, sampling, order clarification, and after-sales coordination. Fast response time is particularly valuable for packaging buyers who may require confirmation on specifications, artwork, sizing, materials, or order quantities. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, design assistance, private labeling, or customized packaging structure development.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed meets the highest service benchmark, but service capability cannot be fully assessed because customization support is not provided in the data. Since packaging procurement often depends heavily on customization, the lack of confirmed Full Customization capability limits the score. The supplier performs well in communication efficiency but has incomplete evidence for broader service capability.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 94.8%
- Platform tag: “On-time delivery 94.8%”

Elaboration
The supplier reports an on-time delivery rate of 94.8%, which is above the 90% threshold for strong delivery performance. This suggests that the supplier has relatively reliable order fulfillment behavior on the platform. For packaging buyers, stable delivery is important because packaging delays can affect downstream product assembly, retail launch schedules, and logistics planning. The data does not include average lead time, rush order capability, shipping methods, or historical delay reasons.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the provided delivery metric, the supplier qualifies for a high delivery score because its on-time delivery rate exceeds 90%. However, the score is not the maximum because only one delivery metric is available, and there is insufficient data on lead-time consistency, production scheduling capacity, or shipment performance across different order sizes.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Number of reviews: 10
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: supplier/factory verification indicated as True

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.9, which indicates positive feedback from reviewed transactions. The verified supplier status also provides some quality assurance foundation, as it suggests the supplier has passed a platform-level verification process. However, the review count is limited to 10, which means the rating is based on a relatively small customer feedback sample. The data does not confirm whether the supplier offers Finished Product Inspection, pre-shipment inspection, internal QC procedures, defect rate control, material testing, or third-party inspection support.

Scoring Rationale
The high rating and verification status support a favorable quality impression, but the limited number of reviews and lack of confirmed finished product inspection prevent a top-tier score. The supplier appears to have basic quality credibility, but the available data is not sufficient to confirm a mature or comprehensive quality management system.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

75 / 100

  • Company Strength: 12 / 20
  • Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16 / 20
  • Business Performance: 15 / 20
  • Service Capability: 8 / 10
  • Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
  • Quality & Customer Feedback: 15 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. is recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for buyers seeking packaging products with moderate order volumes, low-to-medium MOQ requirements, fast supplier response, and Trade Assurance-backed transactions. The supplier is better suited for small and medium-sized buyers, trial orders, customized packaging inquiry validation, and procurement projects where fast communication and reliable on-time shipment are important.

Key risks include modest factory scale, only 30+ staff, limited review volume, short 2-year Gold Supplier history, and insufficient data on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, detailed QC systems, production capacity, and third-party certifications. Buyers should request samples, confirm customization capability, clarify inspection standards, and use Trade Assurance for initial orders.

The supplier shows growth potential due to active recent orders, CN¥405.6K+ transaction value, high 4.9 rating, strong 94.8% on-time delivery, and ≤1 hour response time. However, larger buyers or brands requiring strict compliance documentation should conduct additional due diligence before scaling procurement.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenghong (Shenzhen) Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenghong (Shenzhen) Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Itis Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Itis Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen M-Star Packaging Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen M-Star Packaging Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongyunda Gift Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongyunda Gift Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tian Cheng Material Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tian Cheng Material Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qianxun Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qianxun Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuyun Packaging (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuyun Packaging (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Datianxia Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Datianxia Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Poma Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Poma Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingkaihua Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingkaihua Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuehong Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuehong Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Jinqi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Jinqi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Homful Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Homful Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Jinan Jinbao Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Jinbao Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaibei Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaibei Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Luozhuang Tongtai Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Luozhuang Tongtai Building Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Long Island Forever Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Long Island Forever Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Heimi Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Heimi Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qianlv Scarf Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qianlv Scarf Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Veidoo Digital Vision Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Veidoo Digital Vision Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ept Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ept Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Ruiyi Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Ruiyi Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenjiang Voton Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenjiang Voton Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengli Digital Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengli Digital Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Decent (Shandong) Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Decent (Shandong) Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shunhong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shunhong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Link Sense Intelligent Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Link Sense Intelligent Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Biying Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Biying Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shenxiangyu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shenxiangyu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Aik Instruments Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Aik Instruments Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Jyd Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Jyd Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Dilanke Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jining Dilanke Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tongliang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tongliang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026