zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. is a China-based packaging supplier located in Zhejiang, offering customized envelope and mailer-related products with listed MOQs of 500 pieces across the provided product samples. The supplier shows solid platform credibility, supported by 6 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status. Its recent business performance is commercially validated, with 100+ orders and CN¥1.3M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.9 store rating. Delivery performance is a key strength, with an on-time delivery rate of 97.6%. However, company scale visibility is limited because employee count is not provided, and quality system details such as Finished Product Inspection are not available. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking customized packaging products in small to mid-sized order volumes, especially those prioritizing platform-backed transactions, reliable delivery, and reasonable commercial activity.

Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company: Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Zhejiang, China
  • Factory area: 1,500+㎡
  • Employee count: Insufficient Data
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed factory area of 1,500+㎡, which indicates a physical production or operating base, but the scale cannot be fully assessed because the employee count is missing. The verified supplier status provides a degree of confidence that the company has undergone some form of platform or supplier verification. However, without employee numbers, production lines, monthly capacity, machinery details, or factory audit documentation, the company’s true production depth and scalability remain only partially visible.

Scoring Rationale

The factory area suggests basic to moderate operational capability rather than a clearly large-scale manufacturing base. The verified supplier status improves confidence, but the lack of employee data prevents assigning a high score under this dimension. Based strictly on the available data, the supplier appears to have foundational production capability with some credibility, but not enough evidence to classify it as a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / platform tags: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 97.6%”

Elaboration

The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 6 years, which indicates a relatively established presence on the platform. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with a platform-based transaction protection mechanism. Verified supplier status further strengthens credibility. The available platform tags also provide operational indicators related to response time and delivery performance. However, the data does not include external certifications, industry-specific compliance certificates, or detailed audit documents beyond the verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 6-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status forms a strong platform credibility profile. While the supplier does not show a broad set of industry certifications in the provided data, the core trust indicators are complete and relatively mature. This justifies a high score, though not a perfect one due to the absence of additional compliance or certification evidence.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.3M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Review count: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates active recent commercial performance, with more than 100 orders and over CN¥1.3M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has ongoing buyer activity and a measurable sales record. The 4.9 store rating is strong, suggesting positive customer satisfaction. However, the review count is only listed as 20+, which is relatively limited compared with suppliers that have extensive review histories.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s order volume and transaction value show meaningful commercial validation, particularly for a packaging supplier with relatively low unit prices and MOQs of 500 pieces. The high store rating supports positive buyer experience. However, the limited review count reduces the depth of customer feedback evidence, so the score should reflect stable but not top-tier business performance.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Product listings include customized packaging-related items, such as custom zipper mailers, embossed brand logo envelopes, private label envelopes, and customized business-related products
  • Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤2 hours indicates reasonably efficient communication. The product information repeatedly references custom, embossed logo, private label, and customized packaging products, which suggests that the supplier offers customization-related services. However, the data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” capability, nor does it provide information on design support, sample development speed, packaging engineering, OEM/ODM scope, or dedicated account service.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier appears responsive and commercially oriented toward customized packaging products, which supports a positive service assessment. However, because the response time is not within the ≤1 hour top-tier threshold and explicit Full Customization support is not provided, the service capability should be rated as good but not excellent.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 97.6%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 97.6% is a clear strength. This exceeds the 90% benchmark for top-tier delivery performance under the scoring criteria. Reliable delivery is especially important for packaging products, as delays can affect downstream fulfillment, retail launches, promotional campaigns, or e-commerce shipping schedules.

Scoring Rationale

With an on-time delivery rate above 90%, the supplier qualifies for the highest scoring range in this dimension. The 97.6% figure indicates strong fulfillment reliability based on the provided platform data. No negative delivery indicators are provided.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Review count: 20+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Supplier verification indicated as True

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive signal for customer satisfaction. The review count of 20+ provides some buyer feedback, though the sample size is not large enough to fully validate long-term quality consistency. Verified supplier status supports a basic level of credibility, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, formal quality certifications, defect rate, inspection procedures, or third-party quality control systems.

Scoring Rationale

The high rating supports a favorable quality perception, and supplier verification provides some assurance. However, the lack of explicit Finished Product Inspection data and the relatively limited review count prevent a top-tier score. The supplier appears to have good customer feedback but only partially visible quality assurance infrastructure.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking customized packaging products such as mailers, envelopes, embossed logo packaging, and private label packaging at relatively accessible MOQs of 500 pieces. The supplier is particularly appropriate for small to mid-sized buyers, e-commerce sellers, brand packaging buyers, and companies that value platform protection, strong delivery performance, and responsive communication.

Main strengths include: - 6 years as an Gold Supplier
- Trade Assurance support
- Verified supplier status
- Strong on-time delivery rate of 97.6%
- Recent transaction record of CN¥1.3M+ and 100+ orders in the past six months
- High store rating of 4.9

Main risks include: - Employee count is not provided
- Production capacity details are insufficient
- Finished Product Inspection information is not provided
- Review count is moderate at 20+
- Full Customization capability is not explicitly confirmed

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good platform maturity, active sales performance, and strong delivery reliability. If further verified through employee data, production capacity confirmation, sample testing, and quality inspection documentation, it could become a stronger long-term packaging supplier for customized and branded packaging procurement.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Hangzhou Yukang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yukang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qianxun Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qianxun Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuyun Packaging (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuyun Packaging (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Datianxia Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Datianxia Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Poma Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Poma Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingkaihua Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingkaihua Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenghong (Shenzhen) Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenghong (Shenzhen) Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuehong Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuehong Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Jinqi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongxiang Jinqi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fafaliang Packaging Materials (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fafaliang Packaging Materials (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Freefly Paper Packaging Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Freefly Paper Packaging Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Itis Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Itis Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Environstar Enterprise Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Environstar Enterprise Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Cgx Optoelectronic Technology Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cgx Optoelectronic Technology Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kailun New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kailun New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Longwell Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Longwell Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Changshu Lifeng Linen&Cotton Weaving Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changshu Lifeng Linen&Cotton Weaving Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Ntec Monofilament Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Ntec Monofilament Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yukang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yukang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Tuowei Mechanical & Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Tuowei Mechanical & Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Wennuan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Wennuan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rondy Composite Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rondy Composite Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Rdsignal Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Rdsignal Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Miningwell Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Miningwell Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Nuotai Fashion Co, Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Nuotai Fashion Co, Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Jingxin Lifting Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Jingxin Lifting Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Fuma Agriculture And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Fuma Agriculture And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
World Backyard (Shenzhen) Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
World Backyard (Shenzhen) Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Jinyi Food Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Jinyi Food Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langfang Fangdun Fireproof Sealing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langfang Fangdun Fireproof Sealing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Yonghao Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Yonghao Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Sunlast Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Sunlast Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Canmei Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Canmei Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026