Shandong Fuma Agriculture And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shandong Fuma Agriculture And Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based agricultural technology supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 6,200+ square meters and 60+ staff. The company offers agriculture-related products including biodegradable tomato plant locks, mushroom growing systems, galvanized steel pipe skeletons, polycarbonate agriculture greenhouse products, and PE/PO plastic film products. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 10 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status. However, commercial validation is moderate to limited: the supplier recorded 9 orders over the past six months, CN¥1.2M+ transaction value, a 3.8 store rating, and only 2 reviews. Delivery performance is a key concern, with an on-time delivery rate of 71.4%. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking agricultural greenhouse or farming-related products with platform-backed transaction protection, but buyers should manage delivery risk and verify product quality requirements before bulk purchasing.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shandong, China
- Factory area: 6,200+ ㎡
- Employees: 60+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base with a factory area exceeding 6,200 square meters and more than 60 staff. This indicates an established operating scale rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the stated company presence. However, the available data does not include detailed production line count, annual production capacity, machinery list, factory audit report, or specific factory certification documentation.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates a moderate production foundation, supported by measurable factory size and staffing. Its scale is not large enough, based on the provided data, to be classified as a large-scale stable supply chain, but it is stronger than a small supplier with limited disclosed capacity. The verified supplier status supports reliability, while the absence of deeper factory audit or production capacity data prevents a higher score.

Final Score
15 / 20

1. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 10 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 71.4%”

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform history, with 10 years of Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance support. These are important indicators for procurement risk control, especially for international buyers who require platform-backed transaction mechanisms. The supplier is also marked as verified. However, the listed tags are operational indicators rather than formal product, factory, or management system certifications. No specific ISO, product compliance, export certification, or third-party audit certificate is provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale
The long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status provide strong platform credibility. These factors indicate a relatively mature presence and reduce basic transaction risk. However, because the certification label information is incomplete and does not show formal compliance certificates, the supplier does not reach the highest possible level for full compliance assurance.

Final Score
18 / 20

1. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 9
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.2M+
- Store rating: 3.8
- Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration
The supplier has generated measurable transaction activity in the past six months, with CN¥1.2M+ in transaction value. This suggests that some orders may be relatively high-value, which is consistent with greenhouse and agricultural structure-related products. However, the order count is low at 9, and the review base is very limited with only 2 reviews. The store rating of 3.8 is below the level normally associated with strong customer satisfaction evidence.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction amount provides some positive commercial validation, but the limited number of orders, low review count, and moderate store rating weaken the business performance profile. The supplier cannot be considered highly validated by marketplace activity. Its business performance is better than a supplier with no transaction record, but the limited buyer feedback makes confidence in repeat performance constrained.

Final Score
12 / 20

1. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Platform label: “Response time ≤4h”
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time is listed as within 4 hours, which indicates acceptable communication responsiveness for initial inquiries and platform-based procurement communication. However, the data does not state whether the supplier supports Full Customization, design customization, sample customization, OEM/ODM service, or technical project consultation. For agricultural greenhouse and structural products, customization capability can be important, but it cannot be confirmed from the provided data.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is reasonable but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. The absence of Full Customization information limits the service capability score because customization is a key assessment item in this dimension. The supplier appears to have basic communication capability, but there is insufficient evidence to confirm advanced service support.

Final Score
7 / 10

1. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 71.4%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is reported at 71.4%. This falls within the 70–79% range, indicating that delivery reliability is a notable concern. For agricultural structures, greenhouse materials, and project-based procurement, delayed delivery may affect installation schedules, seasonal planting plans, or downstream project timelines.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate between 70% and 79% corresponds to a 5–6 point range. Because 71.4% is close to the lower end of this bracket, the supplier receives the lower score within the range. Delivery should be treated as one of the main procurement risks when considering cooperation.

Final Score
5 / 10

1. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 3.8
- Number of reviews: 2
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a store rating of 3.8 based on only 2 reviews. This is a very limited customer feedback base, making it difficult to draw strong conclusions about consistent quality performance. Verified supplier status offers some baseline credibility, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, quality management certification, inspection process details, defect rate, or third-party quality audit results.

Scoring Rationale
The quality profile is constrained by limited review volume and a moderate store rating. While verified supplier status supports basic trust, the lack of disclosed inspection systems or quality certifications prevents a stronger assessment. The supplier has some quality credibility, but the available customer feedback is not sufficient to confirm stable quality performance across multiple orders.

Final Score
10 / 20

Total Score

67 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Shandong Fuma Agriculture And Technology Co., Ltd. may be suitable for buyers seeking agricultural greenhouse materials, farming-related accessories, and project-based agricultural products with Trade Assurance protection. It is more appropriate for buyers who can conduct sample confirmation, technical clarification, and staged purchasing before committing to large-scale orders.

Main risk points include the 71.4% on-time delivery rate, limited review count, moderate 3.8 store rating, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, formal quality certifications, and customization capability. The supplier’s strengths are its 10-year Gold Supplier history, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, measurable factory area, and CN¥1.2M+ recent transaction value.

Overall, the supplier has moderate growth potential, especially if it improves delivery reliability, expands verified customer feedback, and provides clearer quality inspection documentation. For high-risk or time-sensitive procurement projects, additional due diligence is recommended before bulk purchasing.