zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Anhui Zehong Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Anhui Zehong Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based packaging supplier located in Anhui, with a reported factory area of 3,600+㎡ and 20+ staff. Based on the provided product listings, the company focuses on custom printed packaging products, including aluminized, PE plastic, food packaging, candy packaging, and Mylar-type packaging items, with relatively low MOQs ranging from 200 to 500 pieces. The supplier shows solid platform credibility through Gold Supplier status for 2 years, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and customization-related service tags including Full Customization and ODM service availability. Its recent business performance is moderate to strong, with 200+ orders and CN¥473.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 70+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for small to medium buyers seeking customized packaging with flexible MOQ and acceptable platform safeguards. Key limitations include a relatively small workforce and insufficient data on finished product inspection systems.

Anhui Zehong Packaging Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company Name: Anhui Zehong Packaging Technology Co., Ltd.
  • Country: China
  • Province: Anhui
  • Factory Area: 3,600+㎡
  • Employees: 20+ staff
  • Verified Supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed factory area of over 3,600 square meters, which indicates a physical production base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The company also reports 20+ staff, suggesting a relatively lean workforce. This staffing level is not large, but it can still support basic production, sales, customization coordination, and order fulfillment if operations are organized efficiently.

The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to the factory profile because it indicates that some level of supplier verification has been completed on the platform. However, the available data does not include detailed production line quantity, annual output, machinery list, capacity utilization, export markets, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indication.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic to moderate production capability. The 3,600+㎡ factory area is meaningful for a packaging supplier, but the 20+ staff count limits the assessment from being considered a large-scale stable supply chain. Verified supplier status supports operational credibility, but there is insufficient data on production scale, automation level, or manufacturing capacity to justify a higher score. Therefore, the supplier fits between a small capable factory and a lower-end medium factory.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier Years: 2 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified Supplier: True
  • Certification / Industry Tags: Warranty available, ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. It is an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier. These elements provide buyers with a higher level of transactional confidence compared with suppliers lacking platform verification or payment protection mechanisms.

The supplier also carries commercial and service-related tags such as warranty availability, ODM service availability, full customization, and minor customization. These tags support its positioning as a custom packaging supplier. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established platform suppliers. In addition, no specific third-party management system certifications, product compliance certifications, or industry-specific certificates are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a solid basic platform compliance structure: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification are all present. This is a positive signal for procurement risk control. However, the 2-year Gold Supplier history is not long enough to indicate long-term platform stability, and the provided certification information is mostly service-tag based rather than formal compliance certification. As a result, the supplier should be rated as credible but not top-tier in platform maturity.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in Past 6 Months: 200+
  • Transaction Value in Past 6 Months: CN¥473.2K+
  • Store Rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 70+

Elaboration

The supplier has generated over 200 orders in the past six months, which indicates active commercial engagement on the platform. A six-month transaction value of CN¥473.2K+ suggests that the supplier has meaningful sales activity, though not necessarily at the level of very large-volume exporters or high-value industrial suppliers.

The store rating of 4.9 is strong, and the presence of 70+ reviews provides a reasonable customer feedback base. The combination of high rating and active orders supports the conclusion that the supplier has been commercially validated by buyers to a moderate degree.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable business performance with a healthy number of recent orders and a good rating profile. The transaction amount is commercially meaningful, especially for low-unit-price packaging products, but the available data does not indicate very high transaction scale. The 70+ reviews support buyer confidence, though the review base is not large enough to classify the supplier as highly mature or dominant. Overall, the supplier fits the “stable medium-scale transaction” category.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response Time: ≤3 hours
  • Full Customization: Available
  • Minor Customization: Available
  • ODM Service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is reported as within 3 hours, which is acceptable for B2B communication and indicates a reasonably responsive sales or customer service team. The supplier also supports Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service according to the provided platform tags. This is relevant because the listed products are mainly custom printed packaging products, where communication, artwork handling, customization confirmation, and order coordination are important.

However, the response time is not within one hour, which would represent a stronger service benchmark. There is also no data on multilingual support, sample lead time, design support process, after-sales handling speed, or dedicated account management.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good service capability through customization support and acceptable response speed. The availability of full customization is a strong advantage for buyers requiring logo printing, packaging design adjustment, or customized packaging formats. However, the ≤3-hour response time falls below the highest service tier defined by the scoring standard, and additional service process details are insufficient. Therefore, the supplier is rated as strong but not excellent in service capability.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-Time Dispatch Rate: 95.1%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time dispatch rate is 95.1%, which is above the 90% threshold for the highest scoring range in this category. This indicates that, based on the provided platform data, the supplier has performed well in meeting dispatch commitments.

For customized packaging products, delivery reliability is particularly important because production often depends on artwork confirmation, printing, material preparation, and order-specific specifications. A 95.1% on-time dispatch rate suggests that the supplier has a relatively stable fulfillment process under current order conditions.

Scoring Rationale

The delivery performance is clearly strong according to the provided data. Since the on-time dispatch rate exceeds 90%, the supplier qualifies for the 9–10 point scoring range. A perfect score is not assigned because the data does not include average lead time, delayed order reasons, logistics performance, or performance consistency across different order sizes.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store Rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 70+
  • Verified Supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Supplier verification is marked as True

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.9 and 70+ reviews, which indicates generally positive customer feedback. This supports a favorable quality perception from previous buyers on the platform. The verified supplier status also contributes to basic confidence in the company’s legitimacy and operating profile.

However, the dataset does not provide explicit evidence of Finished Product Inspection. There is also no detailed information on quality control procedures, defect rate, inspection standards, material testing, packaging durability tests, or third-party inspection reports. Therefore, while customer feedback is positive, the depth of quality assurance data is limited.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has good buyer feedback and a strong rating, which are important quality-related indicators. The presence of supplier verification adds a basic layer of reliability. However, the absence of explicit Finished Product Inspection information prevents the supplier from being rated in the highest quality tier. The review count is useful but not large enough to fully validate long-term quality consistency across many buyers and order types.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 14 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 79 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Anhui Zehong Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking customized packaging products with relatively low MOQs, platform payment protection, and acceptable delivery reliability. The supplier is especially appropriate for small to medium-sized procurement projects, trial orders, customized logo packaging, and buyers who value flexible customization over large-scale industrial production capacity.

Suitable Customer Types:
- Small and medium buyers requiring custom printed packaging
- Buyers needing low MOQ options from 200 to 500 pieces
- Importers or brand owners seeking customized packaging with Trade Assurance
- Buyers willing to start with trial orders before scaling volume

Main Risk Points:
- Workforce size is relatively small at 20+ staff
- Gold Supplier history is only 2 years
- Finished Product Inspection information is not provided
- No detailed data on production capacity, machinery, quality control process, or formal product certifications

Growth Potential:
The supplier shows positive growth potential due to its active recent transaction record, 200+ orders in six months, CN¥473.2K+ transaction value, strong 4.9 rating, customization capability, and 95.1% on-time dispatch rate. If the supplier can provide clearer quality inspection documentation, production capacity details, and additional compliance certificates, its procurement reliability and suitability for larger buyers would improve.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Datianxia Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Datianxia Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Boyang Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Boyang Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Chenran Packaging Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Chenran Packaging Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Xindingchi Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Xindingchi Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Fiberyard Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Fiberyard Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Lezet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Lezet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Koodsun Technology  Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Koodsun Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Weide Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Weide Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Senang Green Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Senang Green Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Good Growing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Good Growing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kebang Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kebang Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Haidila Electric Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Haidila Electric Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Xintao Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Xintao Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Wanhuacao Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Wanhuacao Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Ziziguo Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Ziziguo Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Chenguang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Chenguang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Hengxing Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Hengxing Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sac Tech. Dev. (Chongqing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sac Tech. Dev. (Chongqing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Guangdong Sound Baby Star Acoustics Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sound Baby Star Acoustics Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Unisec Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Unisec Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fucai Shu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fucai Shu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Etek Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Etek Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wincoo Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wincoo Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Fo Bearings Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Fo Bearings Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Mh Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Mh Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jarmoo Flag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jarmoo Flag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Joystart Amusement Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Joystart Amusement Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yangxin Dingxin Power Electronic Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yangxin Dingxin Power Electronic Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenjiang Kimtex Industrial Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenjiang Kimtex Industrial Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Baoding Aoyou Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoding Aoyou Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Ever Greater Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Ever Greater Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Lvlai Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Lvlai Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shicheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shicheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhibotong Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhibotong Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Goldenhot Plastic & Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Goldenhot Plastic & Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ruitewei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ruitewei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Fluidguard Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Fluidguard Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taian Dongtai Machine Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taian Dongtai Machine Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026