Anhui Good Growing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Anhui Good Growing Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Anhui, offering agricultural greenhouse-related plastic film products with listed MOQ of 1,000 square meters and price ranges of CN¥2.57–6.09. Based on the provided data, the supplier appears to be a small-scale but operationally active manufacturer or factory-linked supplier, with 850+ sqm factory area, 10+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform profile shows basic credibility through 1-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and service tags including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. Commercial performance is still limited but positive, with 20+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value in the past six months. The 5.0 store rating is favorable, but the review base is very small at only 3 reviews. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium trial orders, customized agricultural film products, and suppliers with basic platform protection rather than large-volume mature procurement programs.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Anhui, China
- Factory area: 850+ sqm
- Staff size: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The company has a disclosed physical factory scale and employee base, which supports the existence of basic production and operational capability. However, the factory area of 850+ sqm and 10+ staff indicate a relatively small production organization rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturer. The verified supplier status improves confidence in the company’s legitimacy, but the provided data does not include production lines, annual capacity, machinery details, export volume, or factory audit reports.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier meets the threshold for basic manufacturing capability because it has a declared factory area, staff count, and verification status. However, the limited factory size and small workforce restrict its score compared with medium or large manufacturers. There is insufficient evidence to classify it as a large-scale stable supply chain partner.
Final Score
11 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. Trade Assurance provides buyers with a platform-based transaction protection mechanism. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and customization-related tags also strengthens the supplier’s platform profile. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits long-term credibility assessment.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has core credibility features in place, but the short Gold Supplier history prevents it from being rated as a highly established platform supplier. The certification/tag structure is reasonably complete for a young supplier profile, but there is insufficient data on third-party management system certifications, export certifications, or long-term compliance records.
Final Score
16 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 20+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 3
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded recent transaction activity, which indicates some market acceptance on the platform. The 20+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value suggest early-stage but real commercial performance. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review count is very limited, making the rating less statistically reliable. There is insufficient data on repeat customers, export destinations, major clients, or historical annual sales.
Scoring Rationale
The business performance is stronger than an unproven supplier because it has documented orders and transaction value. However, the order volume and transaction amount remain modest, and the small number of reviews limits confidence in broader buyer satisfaction. This supports a low-to-mid score rather than a high commercial performance rating.
Final Score
13 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: listed
- Minor Customization: listed
- ODM service available: listed
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates good service capability through relatively fast response time and multiple customization-related service tags. A response time of ≤2 hours is commercially acceptable for international sourcing communication. The presence of Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service indicates flexibility for buyers requiring tailored agricultural film or greenhouse-related products.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response time within 1 hour, but ≤2 hours is still efficient. Customization capability is a clear advantage based on the provided platform tags. Therefore, the supplier fits the upper range of normal service capability but not the top tier.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. This suggests that, based on the available platform data, completed orders have been shipped on schedule. However, the provided data does not include total shipment count, average lead time, logistics regions, or performance under large-volume orders.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier has a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, it receives the maximum score. The only limitation is that shipment volume depth is not provided.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 3
- Finished Product Inspection: listed
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect store rating and a Finished Product Inspection tag, which are positive quality indicators. Verified supplier status also adds confidence to the quality control profile. However, the review base is very small, with only 3 reviews, so the reliability of the 5.0 score is limited. There is insufficient data on defect rate, inspection reports, quality certifications, laboratory testing, or customer complaint history.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows basic quality assurance mechanisms and positive customer feedback, but the evidence base is not broad enough for a top-tier quality score. Finished Product Inspection supports quality control, while the low review count creates uncertainty. A mid-to-good score is appropriate.
Final Score
15 / 20
Total Score
73 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended with controlled scope and risk management. Anhui Good Growing Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking agricultural greenhouse plastic film products, customized specifications, and small-to-medium trial procurement under Trade Assurance.
The supplier’s main strengths are verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, customization capability, Finished Product Inspection, fast response time, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Its main risks are small factory scale, limited staff size, only 1 year of Gold Supplier history, modest transaction volume, and very limited customer review quantity.
Recommended buyer types include small and medium importers, greenhouse project buyers, agricultural distributors, and purchasers conducting sample orders or pilot sourcing. For large-volume or long-term procurement, buyers should request additional evidence such as production capacity details, quality inspection records, lead time confirmation, and sample validation before scaling orders. The supplier has growth potential if it can expand transaction history, increase review volume, and provide stronger quality and production documentation.
Leave your comment