Anhui Weide Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Anhui Weide Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Anhui, focusing on sweeper brush strips, replacement broom components, PP bristle forklift strip brooms, and Dulevo sweeper brush products. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale but operationally active supplier, with a factory area of 400+ sqm and 10+ staff. Its platform credibility is supported by 3 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and listed capability tags including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and OEM for well-known brands. Business performance is relatively strong for its size, with 100+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 50+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ replacement brush products, customized sweeper components, and small-to-medium procurement volumes. Key risks relate mainly to limited factory scale and incomplete visibility into broader production capacity.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Anhui, China
- Factory area: 400+ sqm
- Employees: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product range includes sweeper brush strips, replacement broom products, PP bristle forklift strip brooms, and Dulevo sweeper brush components

Elaboration
The company has a clearly identified production base and a verified supplier status, which provides a basic level of operational credibility. However, the reported factory area of 400+ sqm and 10+ staff indicate a relatively small manufacturing scale. This suggests that the supplier may be better positioned for customized, low-MOQ, replacement-part, or small-to-medium batch orders rather than large-scale industrial supply programs.

The product listings show a focused category around sweeper brushes and replacement broom components, which supports some degree of specialization. However, the data does not provide details on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, warehouse size, R&D staff, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indication.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates basic production capability and verified supplier status, but its physical scale and workforce size are limited. The company should not be rated as a large or medium-scale stable factory based on the available data. Its score is supported by operational presence and product specialization, but constrained by small factory size and insufficient production capacity data.

Final Score
11 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 3 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: OEM for well-known brands, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full Customization

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. A 3-year Gold Supplier history shows that the company is not newly listed on the platform, while Trade Assurance provides transactional protection for buyers. Verified supplier status further strengthens basic credibility.

The listed tags are commercially relevant, especially Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, and Full Customization. These indicate that the supplier may support customized product development and quality checks at the finished-goods stage. However, the data does not include internationally recognized certifications such as ISO certificates, product compliance standards, audit reports, or third-party test documentation. Therefore, compliance credibility is solid at the platform level but not fully validated at the formal certification level.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has core credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and several capability tags. The 3-year tenure is positive but not long enough to be considered highly established. The absence of detailed certification documentation prevents a top-tier score.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.2M+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 50+

Elaboration
The supplier shows measurable commercial activity over the past six months. More than 100 orders and CN¥1.2M+ in transaction value indicate that the supplier has achieved a meaningful transaction record on the platform. The 4.7 store rating is positive and suggests generally satisfactory buyer experience.

The 50+ reviews provide some customer feedback base, though it is not large enough to be considered extensive. The data does not include repeat buyer rate, dispute rate, cancellation rate, export market distribution, major customer types, or product-level sales breakdown. As a result, business performance appears stable but not yet at a high-volume benchmark.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates active and credible sales performance, especially considering its small factory size. The order volume, transaction value, and rating support a mid-to-upper score. However, the review count is moderate and the available data does not prove consistently high-volume or enterprise-level commercial performance.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1h
- Full Customization: listed
- ODM service available: listed

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of less than or equal to one hour is a strong service indicator, particularly for international buyers who require quick quotation, sample confirmation, or technical clarification. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service tags suggests that the supplier can support customized brush products or adapted replacement components.

However, the data does not provide details on English communication capability, sample lead time, engineering support, design file handling, after-sales process, or dedicated account management. Therefore, the supplier’s service capability appears strong in responsiveness and customization availability, but some service depth remains unverified.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier meets the highest response-time benchmark and has stated customization capabilities. This supports a high score. The score is not a perfect 10 because the data lacks details on technical service structure, project management capability, and after-sales support.

Final Score
9 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 96.6%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 96.6% is a strong indicator of delivery reliability. This exceeds the 90% threshold for the highest scoring range and suggests that the company has been able to fulfill most platform orders within expected shipping timelines.

The data does not include average lead time, peak-season performance, logistics methods, export documentation capability, or performance by order size. Even so, the on-time delivery rate is directly relevant and favorable for procurement evaluation.

Scoring Rationale
A 96.6% on-time shipment rate qualifies for the 9–10 point range. The supplier receives a high score because the delivery metric is clearly above 90%. A perfect score is not assigned because there is insufficient data on lead time consistency across larger or customized orders.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 50+
- Finished Product Inspection: listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory area and staff data available, but detailed quality system documentation: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive customer rating of 4.7 and more than 50 reviews, which indicates a reasonable level of buyer satisfaction. The Finished Product Inspection tag is an important quality-related indicator, suggesting that goods may be checked before shipment. Verified supplier status also adds basic confidence in the supplier profile.

However, the evaluation is limited by the absence of detailed quality documentation. The data does not include defect rate, inspection procedure, QC staff number, product testing standards, material traceability, ISO certification, third-party audit reports, or sample approval workflow. Therefore, quality assurance appears acceptable at a basic platform level, but not fully proven for buyers with strict compliance or technical requirements.

Scoring Rationale
The 4.7 rating, 50+ reviews, Finished Product Inspection tag, and verified supplier status support a solid quality score. However, the review base is moderate rather than large, and there is insufficient data on formal quality management systems. This places the supplier in the good but not top-tier range.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

76 / 100

Score breakdown:
- Company Strength: 11 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16 / 20
- Business Performance: 16 / 20
- Service Capability: 9 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 15 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order scope. Anhui Weide Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking customized sweeper brush strips, replacement broom parts, PP bristle strip brooms, and related sweeper brush components, especially where low MOQ, fast response, and moderate transaction reliability are important.

The supplier is most appropriate for small-to-medium procurement volumes, replacement-part sourcing, customized samples, and repeat purchases after product validation. Buyers with large-scale production requirements, strict compliance audits, or highly standardized quality systems should request additional documentation before placing major orders.

Main risk points include limited factory scale, small workforce, insufficient disclosed production capacity, and insufficient data on formal quality certifications or detailed QC procedures. Growth potential is supported by active recent transactions, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, Full Customization, ODM capability, Finished Product Inspection, strong response speed, and a high on-time delivery rate. A practical sourcing approach would be to start with samples or a pilot order, verify product consistency, and then scale orders gradually based on delivery and quality performance.