zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Langbin Technology (Hangzhou ) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

LANGBIN TECHNOLOGY (HANGZHOU) CO., LTD. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, mainly offering office document organization products such as A4/A5 file folders, transparent folders, double-pocket folders, contract file holders, and custom logo folders. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a relatively small-scale but commercially active supplier, with a factory area of 890+㎡ and 30+ staff. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and transaction validation: it has 13 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, is marked as a verified supplier, and has recorded 400+ orders and CN¥2M+ transaction value in the past six months. Customer feedback is also positive, with a 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-to-medium MOQ office stationery products with platform-backed transaction protection. Key limitations are the modest factory scale and insufficient data on formal product inspection systems or detailed customization capability.

LANGBIN TECHNOLOGY (HANGZHOU ) CO., LTD.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Zhejiang, China
  • Factory area: 890+㎡
  • Employees: 30+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base and workforce, indicating that it has basic manufacturing or operational capacity. A factory area of 890+㎡ and 30+ employees suggests a small-scale factory rather than a large industrial manufacturer. The presence of supplier verification improves confidence that the company has undergone some form of platform or supplier validation, but the available data does not indicate large-scale production capacity, multiple production lines, advanced equipment, or internationally recognized factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic production capability and has verified supplier status, which supports operational credibility. However, its factory size and employee count are relatively limited, so it should not be classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. The profile is more consistent with a small but established supplier capable of handling regular stationery-related orders, especially given its business activity on the platform. Due to the limited factory area and workforce, the score is placed in the “small but with basic production capability” range.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 13 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags:
  • Warranty available
  • Socially responsible
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • OEM for well-known brands

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong platform credibility. A 13-year Gold Supplier history is a meaningful indicator of long-term presence on . Trade Assurance support adds transaction protection for buyers, while verified supplier status further strengthens trustworthiness. The listed tags also indicate platform-recognized commercial attributes, including warranty availability and customization-related support. However, the data does not provide specific third-party certifications such as ISO, BSCI, FSC, or product compliance certifications, so compliance depth beyond platform-level credibility cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

This dimension is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. Long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification together form a strong platform-backed credibility profile. The certification and industry tags are relatively complete from a platform perspective, although the absence of detailed third-party factory or quality certifications prevents a perfect score. Overall, the supplier fits the category of a long-term and credible platform supplier with solid transaction safeguards.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 400+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥2M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated active commercial performance over the last six months. More than 400 orders and CN¥2M+ in transaction value indicate a meaningful level of market validation. A 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews suggest positive buyer reception and a reasonable review base. The order and transaction data are strong relative to the supplier’s modest factory scale, implying consistent demand for its office stationery products on the platform.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has both volume and value indicators supporting commercial reliability. The 400+ order count and CN¥2M+ transaction value show that buyers are actively purchasing from this supplier. The 4.9 rating further supports positive customer satisfaction. While the data is strong, it is not enough to confirm enterprise-level or very high-volume global distribution capability, so the score is high but not maximum.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Customization-related indicators:
  • “Low MOQ for customization” tag
  • Product listings include “Factory Custom,” “Custom Logo,” and OEM-related platform tag
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within two hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. The available product and platform tags suggest that the supplier can support certain customization requirements, such as custom logo folders and low-MOQ customization. However, the data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” capability, nor does it provide details on design support, sample development, packaging customization, mold development, or engineering support.

Scoring Rationale

The service capability is above basic level because the response time is reasonable and customization is partially supported by listed product types and platform tags. However, since the response time is not within one hour and Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the supplier cannot be scored in the highest service range. The score reflects normal service responsiveness with some customization capability, but not a clearly proven advanced customization system.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 98.8%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is very strong. At 98.8%, it exceeds the 90% benchmark for top-tier delivery performance under the provided scoring criteria. This indicates that the supplier has been able to maintain reliable dispatch performance for platform orders.

Scoring Rationale

Based strictly on the provided delivery metric, the supplier qualifies for the highest scoring range. A 98.8% on-time dispatch rate suggests strong operational discipline in order fulfillment. Since no negative delivery indicators are provided, the supplier receives a full score in this category.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 100+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Supplier verification is marked as True, but detailed factory audit scope is not provided

Elaboration

The supplier has strong customer-facing quality indicators, including a 4.9 rating and 100+ reviews. These figures suggest generally positive buyer satisfaction and a meaningful feedback base. Verified supplier status also adds a layer of credibility. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier has a Finished Product Inspection process, formal quality control certification, third-party product testing, or documented inspection procedures. Therefore, while customer feedback is positive, the internal quality assurance system cannot be fully assessed.

Scoring Rationale

The high rating and review volume support a favorable quality perception among buyers. Supplier verification also contributes positively. However, because there is insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection and detailed factory quality systems, the score should not reach the top range. The supplier appears to have good market feedback and basic credibility, but the quality control structure is not fully evidenced by the provided data.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

LANGBIN TECHNOLOGY (HANGZHOU) CO., LTD. is suitable for buyers seeking office stationery products such as A4/A5 folders, document organizers, transparent folders, two-pocket folders, and custom logo file holders. It is especially suitable for small-to-medium volume buyers, e-commerce sellers, promotional product buyers, office supply distributors, and customers requiring relatively low MOQ purchasing with Trade Assurance protection.

The supplier’s main strengths are strong platform credibility, long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, solid recent transaction performance, high store rating, and excellent on-time dispatch rate. These indicators make it a commercially validated supplier with relatively low platform transaction risk.

The main risks are its limited factory scale, with only 890+㎡ factory area and 30+ staff, and insufficient data regarding formal quality inspection systems, Finished Product Inspection, and detailed factory audit scope. Full Customization capability is also not clearly confirmed.

Overall, the supplier has good growth potential for standardized and moderately customized office stationery orders, but buyers should request samples, confirm QC procedures, and clarify customization scope before placing large-volume or specification-sensitive orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Hangzhou Bison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Bison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Grin (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Grin (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiuzhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiuzhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Ingscreen Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Ingscreen Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Heyshow Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Heyshow Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hengxianlong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hengxianlong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Lantu Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Lantu Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Shinepoch Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Shinepoch Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Mindong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Mindong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Chengxi Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Chengxi Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jingfei Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jingfei Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Clean Pco Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Clean Pco Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Danno Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Danno Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hengtuo Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hengtuo Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Health Shining Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Health Shining Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tg Cup Industry Technology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tg Cup Industry Technology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Top Mechanical And Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Top Mechanical And Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Pinzhu New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Pinzhu New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Midstar Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Midstar Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Hangzhou Sakura Thread Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Sakura Thread Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huan Lin Magnetic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huan Lin Magnetic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Audley Digital Control Equipments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Audley Digital Control Equipments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Manorshi Electronics Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Manorshi Electronics Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Bai Hong Cross-Border E-Business Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Bai Hong Cross-Border E-Business Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Uokin Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Uokin Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pingui International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pingui International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Kingzest Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Kingzest Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rongfeng Agricultural Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rongfeng Agricultural Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Mengcheng Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Mengcheng Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Bolang Energy Saving Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Bolang Energy Saving Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Anolly Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Anolly Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Husurg (Shandong) New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Husurg (Shandong) New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jinyi Self Adhesive Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jinyi Self Adhesive Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Oreno (Liangshan) International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Oreno (Liangshan) International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Basen Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Basen Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bluesun Solar Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bluesun Solar Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen T.D.S Electronic Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen T.D.S Electronic Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Kepin Import And Export Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Kepin Import And Export Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026