zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Quanzhou Midstar Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

11.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Quanzhou Midstar Abrasive Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Fujian, with a reported factory area of over 2,500 m² and more than 20 staff. The company operates in stone-related abrasive and adhesive products, including marble/granite glue, magnesite Frankfurt abrasive blocks, diamond renewing tools, oxalic acid polishing abrasives, and special-shaped magnesite tools. Based on the available data, it appears to be a small-to-medium scale manufacturer with verified supplier status, long Gold Supplier history of 14 years, Trade Assurance support, and customization-related service labels. Its recent platform performance shows 100+ orders and CN¥473.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 4.9 store rating from 40+ reviews. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking abrasive and stone-processing consumable products with moderate order volumes, customization options, and strong delivery reliability. Key limitations include limited workforce scale and insufficient disclosed data on formal product certifications or finished product inspection systems.

Quanzhou Midstar Abrasive Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Fujian, China
- Factory area: 2,500+ m²
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a physical factory footprint of more than 2,500 m² and a workforce of over 20 employees. This indicates an established operating base, though the scale is not large compared with high-capacity industrial manufacturers. The verified supplier status provides some support that the company’s business and production information has undergone platform-level verification.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability with a defined factory area, employee base, and supplier verification. However, the workforce size of 20+ staff suggests limited production depth compared with larger factories, and there is no data indicating large-scale automated production lines, multiple workshops, annual capacity, or advanced factory certifications. Therefore, it fits best into the “small but with basic production capability” to lower “mid-sized stable factory” range.

Final Score
13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 14 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: Full customization, ODM service available, Minor customization, Response time ≤2h

Elaboration
The supplier has a long platform history as a 14-year Gold Supplier and supports Trade Assurance, which strengthens transaction credibility. Verified supplier status further improves platform trust. The listed labels show customization and ODM service capabilities, although no independent product certifications or formal industry compliance certificates are provided in the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale
A 14-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status represent strong platform credibility. These factors provide meaningful assurance for cross-border buyers using -style sourcing channels. However, the available data does not show specific third-party product certifications, management system certifications, or detailed compliance documents. This prevents a perfect score but still places the supplier in a high credibility range.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past six months: 100+
- Transaction amount in past six months: CN¥473.2K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 40+

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 100 orders and over CN¥473.2K in transaction value during the last six months. This shows active marketplace demand and a visible level of commercial validation. A 4.9 store rating is strong, while 40+ reviews provide some buyer feedback base, although the review volume is not extremely large.

Scoring Rationale
The order count is healthy and the transaction amount indicates stable recent activity rather than purely inactive listing exposure. The high store rating supports positive buyer experience. However, the transaction scale and review count are moderate, not at the level of very high-volume suppliers with extensive review histories. The supplier therefore fits the upper-middle range for business performance.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Platform labels: Full customization, ODM service available, Minor customization, Response time ≤2h

Elaboration
The supplier provides a response time of within two hours, which indicates reasonably efficient communication. The presence of Full customization, Minor customization, and ODM service labels suggests it can support different levels of customization, from basic adaptations to more involved product development cooperation.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates solid service capability due to its customization labels and relatively fast response time. However, the response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, so it does not reach the highest service band under the scoring standard. No additional data is provided on multilingual support, dedicated account management, sampling speed, or after-sales handling.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The reported on-time dispatch rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest available delivery indicator in the provided data. This suggests that the supplier has performed reliably in meeting dispatch commitments on recorded platform orders.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring rule, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the supplier reports 100.0%, it deserves a top score for delivery performance based strictly on the supplied metric. No data is provided on average lead time, logistics regions, or urgent order capacity, so the score is based only on dispatch punctuality.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 40+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong 4.9 store rating and more than 40 reviews, indicating generally positive customer feedback. Verified supplier status adds some quality-related credibility because basic company information has been checked. However, the data does not specify whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control procedures, product testing records, or recognized quality management certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The high rating supports favorable customer satisfaction, but the review base is moderate rather than large. The absence of explicit Finished Product Inspection data and detailed factory verification scope limits the quality assurance assessment. As a result, the supplier can be considered to have positive customer feedback and basic verification support, but not a fully demonstrated quality management system.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Quanzhou Midstar Abrasive Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers sourcing stone-processing abrasives, marble/granite adhesive products, polishing consumables, and related customized abrasive tools at small-to-medium order volumes. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, good recent transaction activity, high rating, customization capability, and excellent on-time dispatch performance.

The main risks are limited disclosed production scale, relatively small workforce, moderate review volume, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, formal product certifications, factory audit scope, and quality management systems. Buyers should request product specifications, sample testing, QC process documents, and inspection arrangements before placing larger or recurring orders.

Overall, the supplier has solid growth potential for buyers needing flexible customization and reliable delivery, but large-volume or certification-sensitive procurement should proceed only after additional quality and compliance verification.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Huzhou Xingxing Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huzhou Xingxing Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Leaders Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Leaders Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Dingxi Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Dingxi Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuzhou Chenguang Abrasive Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuzhou Chenguang Abrasive Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Cherng Lung Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Cherng Lung Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Rex Abrasive Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Rex Abrasive Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Jiading Abrasive Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Jiading Abrasive Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Enying Abrasive Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Enying Abrasive Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Yinli Abrasive Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Yinli Abrasive Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Huntwell Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Huntwell Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Baiyi Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Baiyi Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Newstar(Quanzhou) Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Newstar(Quanzhou) Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Newstar (Quanzhou) Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Newstar (Quanzhou) Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Kst Electronics Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Kst Electronics Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minyang Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minyang Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Junsid Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Junsid Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Mecalo Sporting Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Mecalo Sporting Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Era Sanitary Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Era Sanitary Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Dapu Machinery Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Dapu Machinery Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Anping County Tuo Jiang Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Tuo Jiang Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Liancheng Energy Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Liancheng Energy Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhonghuilvjian Moving House Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhonghuilvjian Moving House Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Js Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Js Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou  Baogeli Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Baogeli Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Eigday Heating Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Eigday Heating Limited Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kaili Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kaili Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Lianpei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Lianpei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beifa Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beifa Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Biying Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Biying Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Blueworth Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Blueworth Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi 'An Grand Harvest Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi 'An Grand Harvest Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Frascio (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Frascio (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sun Vision New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sun Vision New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Emt Piping Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Emt Piping Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Danling Silicone Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Danling Silicone Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Everich Commerce Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Everich Commerce Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Sanxian Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Sanxian Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Joinwe Wire Mesh Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Anping Joinwe Wire Mesh Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Tangshan Huotian Dayou Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tangshan Huotian Dayou Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026