Hangzhou Clean Pco Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Hangzhou Clean PCO Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 4,000+ m² and 50+ staff. The supplier appears to operate as a small-to-medium scale manufacturing business with verified supplier status and a product portfolio related to pest control and protection accessories, including foldable living traps, moth protection accessories, mouse carpet products, indoor eco-friendly items, and custom logo rodent-related products. Its platform profile shows 8 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and operational tags including low MOQ for customization, response time within 5 hours, and 90.2% on-time delivery. Commercial activity is moderate, with 90+ orders and CN¥608.5K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 20+ reviews. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ sourcing, moderate-volume procurement, and basic customization flexibility, while quality-system depth and inspection documentation require further verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 4,000+ m²
- Staff size: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base with 4,000+ m² of factory space and more than 50 employees. This indicates an established operating entity with basic production capacity rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The verified supplier status provides additional support that the company has undergone some form of platform or supplier verification.

However, the available data does not include annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery details, warehouse capacity, export ratio, or major factory certifications. Therefore, while the company demonstrates credible small-to-medium manufacturing strength, there is insufficient data to classify it as a large-scale or highly integrated supply chain operation.

Scoring Rationale
The factory size and staff count support a stable small-to-medium production base. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence in operational existence and basic manufacturing capability. However, compared with larger suppliers, the available scale indicators are moderate, and there is no disclosed production volume or formal factory certification beyond verification status. This places the supplier in the medium-stability range rather than the top tier.

Final Score
15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Low MOQ for customization, Response time ≤5h, On-time delivery 90.2%
- Verified supplier status: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform history, with 8 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. These are meaningful indicators for platform credibility because they show continued presence, transaction infrastructure, and buyer protection availability. The verified supplier status further supports baseline compliance credibility.

The certification and industry tag set is useful but not fully comprehensive. The available tags relate mainly to customization MOQ, response speed, and delivery performance. There is no provided evidence of internationally recognized product certifications, management system certifications, third-party compliance audits, or specialized industry certifications. Therefore, the platform credibility is strong, but the compliance documentation depth is not fully demonstrated.

Scoring Rationale
An 8-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status together create a solid credibility foundation. The supplier shows long-term platform continuity rather than a newly listed or weakly documented profile. However, the absence of detailed compliance certificates or formal factory certification records prevents a maximum score. The supplier is credible from a platform standpoint, but compliance depth requires further confirmation.

Final Score
17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 90+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥608.5K+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 20+

Elaboration
The supplier has visible recent commercial activity, with more than 90 orders and over CN¥608.5K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that buyers are actively placing orders and that the store has achieved a measurable level of market validation.

The 4.7 store rating is positive, while the 20+ review count provides some customer feedback base. However, the review volume is not large enough to indicate broad market validation across many customers or order scenarios. The transaction value and order count suggest steady activity, but not a high-volume or top-tier commercial profile based on the provided data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates stable medium-level business performance. Recent orders and transaction amount are meaningful enough to confirm active sales momentum, and the rating is favorable. At the same time, the review count is relatively limited, and the transaction scale does not support classification as a very high-volume supplier. The score reflects moderate but credible commercial performance.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤5h
- Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s stated response time of within 5 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for online sourcing. The platform tag “Low MOQ for customization” suggests some degree of customization flexibility, especially for buyers seeking smaller customized orders.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization. There is also no information about design support, sample development lead time, private label service, packaging customization, engineering capability, or multilingual sales support. Therefore, service capability can be considered functional and buyer-friendly, but not proven to be advanced.

Scoring Rationale
The response time is reasonable but does not meet the highest benchmark of within one hour. The low-MOQ customization tag is a positive service indicator, especially for small or trial orders. Since Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the supplier should be scored in the normal-to-good service range rather than the top range.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 90.2%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 90.2% meets the threshold for strong delivery performance under the scoring standard. This indicates that the supplier has generally reliable fulfillment capability and can maintain delivery discipline across recent platform activity.

That said, the data does not include average lead time, production lead time by product category, peak-season performance, logistics options, or historical delay reasons. Therefore, the score should recognize the strong on-time rate while remaining slightly cautious due to limited delivery detail.

Scoring Rationale
A 90.2% on-time delivery rate qualifies for the 9–10 score range. Since the rate is just above the 90% threshold rather than significantly higher, and because no additional lead-time data is available, a score at the lower end of the top range is appropriate.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 20+
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Supported by verified supplier status, but detailed verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7, which suggests generally satisfactory buyer feedback. The review count of 20+ gives some visibility into customer experience, but the feedback base remains relatively limited. This means the rating is useful but not yet supported by a large sample size.

The verified supplier status provides a basic quality credibility signal, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, detailed quality control procedures, testing standards, inspection reports, defect rate, return rate, or product-specific compliance certifications. As a result, the supplier’s quality profile appears acceptable but not fully documented.

Scoring Rationale
The 4.7 rating supports a positive quality and customer experience assessment, while verified supplier status adds baseline assurance. However, the limited review volume and absence of explicit Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality-control documentation prevent a high-tier score. The supplier appears to have acceptable quality credibility, but buyers should verify inspection standards before larger orders.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

79 / 100

• Company Strength: 15 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 17 / 20
• Business Performance: 16 / 20
• Service Capability: 7 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 15 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order scale and pre-shipment verification. Hangzhou Clean PCO Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers looking for low-MOQ procurement, trial orders, moderate-volume sourcing, and basic customization opportunities in the listed pest-control-related product categories.

The supplier’s main strengths are its 8-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 90.2% on-time delivery rate, and active recent transaction record. These factors make it a relatively credible sourcing option for small and medium buyers.

Key risks include limited disclosed factory capability details, only 20+ reviews, no confirmed Finished Product Inspection information, and insufficient data on formal product certifications or advanced quality systems. Before placing larger or repeated orders, buyers should request product samples, inspection terms, factory verification details, and quality-control documentation.

Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential as a mid-level sourcing partner, especially for buyers prioritizing platform-backed transactions, low MOQ, and reliable basic delivery performance.