zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangzhou Clean-Link Filtration Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Clean-Link Filtration Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based filtration product supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 16,000+㎡ and 100+ staff. The supplier appears to have a solid operational foundation, supported by verified supplier status, 18 years as an Gold Supplier, and Trade Assurance availability. Its listed products are mainly fiberglass filter media, filter media rolls, ceiling filter/FFU-related products, and paint-stop/roof filtration materials. Business performance is reasonably validated, with 70+ orders and CN¥2.3M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.8 store rating and 30+ reviews. However, delivery performance is moderate at 86.1% on-time delivery, and there is insufficient data on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, or specific third-party quality certifications. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking an established mid-scale filtration supplier with platform credibility, but buyers with strict delivery or documented quality-system requirements should conduct further verification.

Guangzhou Clean-Link Filtration Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 16,000+㎡
  • Employees: 100+ staff
  • Verified supplier/factory audit status: True
  • Product scope shown includes fiberglass filter media, filter media rolls, ceiling filter/FFU-related product, and customized paint-stop/roof filtration material.

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a meaningful physical production base, with a factory area exceeding 16,000㎡ and more than 100 employees. This indicates a production setup beyond small trading operations and suggests the ability to support regular manufacturing and order fulfillment. The verified supplier status further strengthens its credibility from a factory-capability perspective.

However, the provided data does not include detailed annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery list, export volume, or specific factory management certifications. Therefore, while the company shows clear mid-scale manufacturing strength, there is not enough information to classify it as a large-scale highly integrated production base.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size and employee base support a stable medium-sized manufacturing profile. Verified supplier status adds confidence, but the absence of detailed production capacity and formal factory certification data limits the score from reaching the highest range. The company fits the “medium stable factory” category rather than a fully proven large-scale supply chain.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 18 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier/factory audit: True
  • Platform/industry labels provided: “Response time ≤7h”, “On-time delivery 86.1%”

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile, especially due to its 18-year Gold Supplier history. This is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence and continuity. Trade Assurance support also provides an additional transaction protection mechanism for buyers using .

The supplier is also marked as verified, which supports baseline compliance credibility. However, the available certification/industry labels are limited to response time and on-time delivery. No specific international product certifications, management system certifications, or industry compliance documents are provided in the submitted data.

Scoring Rationale

The long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and verification status create a strong platform-based credibility foundation. The score is high because the core trust indicators are present and mature. It is not scored at the absolute maximum because the dataset does not provide detailed certification documents or comprehensive compliance labels beyond platform indicators.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 70+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.3M+
  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Reviews: 30+

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated measurable recent commercial activity, with more than 70 orders and over CN¥2.3M in transaction value within the past six months. This indicates active market demand and a reasonable level of transaction validation.

The store rating of 4.8 is positive and suggests generally favorable buyer feedback. However, the review count of 30+ is moderate rather than extensive. While the transaction value is meaningful, the available order and review data do not indicate very high-volume marketplace dominance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable commercial performance with verified recent transactions, good rating performance, and moderate buyer feedback volume. The transaction amount is relatively strong, while the number of reviews is not large enough to classify customer validation as exceptionally deep. Therefore, the supplier fits a stable mid-level business performance profile.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤7h
  • Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
  • Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 7 hours is acceptable for general B2B sourcing communication, though it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within 1 hour. The provided product list includes one item with the word “Customized” in the product name, but this alone is not sufficient to confirm platform-level Full Customization capability or structured OEM/ODM service.

No additional information is provided regarding dedicated account managers, sample handling speed, technical support, quotation turnaround time, customization workflow, or after-sales service process.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic responsiveness, but the service capability score is limited by the lack of confirmed Full Customization data and broader communication efficiency indicators. A ≤7h response time is acceptable but not premium-level. Based strictly on the available data, the supplier can be considered to have adequate but not outstanding service capability.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 86.1%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 86.1%, which places it in the 80%–89% performance band. This indicates generally functional delivery execution, but it also shows that delivery reliability is not yet at a high-performance level above 90%.

For buyers with flexible delivery windows, this may be acceptable. However, buyers operating time-sensitive production schedules, construction projects, cleanroom installation timelines, or just-in-time inventory systems should pay close attention to this metric and confirm lead times before placing bulk orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 86.1%, the supplier is in the upper-middle part of this range, so an 8-point score is appropriate. It is not rated higher because the data does not exceed the 90% benchmark.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Reviews: 30+
  • Verified supplier/factory audit status: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: True / verified supplier status indicated
  • Specific product certifications or quality system certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive customer-facing quality signal through a 4.8 store rating. The 30+ reviews provide some buyer feedback validation, although the volume is not large enough to fully confirm consistent quality performance across a broad customer base.

The verified supplier status contributes to quality assurance credibility from a supplier verification perspective. However, there is no submitted evidence of Finished Product Inspection, third-party test reports, ISO certification, product compliance certificates, or detailed quality control procedures. As a result, the quality system cannot be fully assessed from the available data.

Scoring Rationale

The company has good customer feedback indicators and a verified status, supporting a solid but not premium quality score. The limited number of reviews and absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality certifications prevent a higher rating. The score reflects good marketplace feedback with only partially visible quality assurance infrastructure.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 17 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 6 / 10
Delivery Performance 8 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 81 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Guangzhou Clean-Link Filtration Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers looking for an established filtration supplier with a verified manufacturing base, long operating history, Trade Assurance support, and reasonable recent transaction performance. The supplier is especially appropriate for medium-volume buyers sourcing fiberglass filter media, filter media rolls, ceiling filter/FFU-related products, or paint-stop/roof filtration materials based on the listed product data.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers seeking a mid-scale verified Chinese filtration supplier
- Importers or distributors requiring Trade Assurance support
- Industrial filtration buyers with moderate delivery flexibility
- Customers who value long platform history and stable transaction records

Main risks:
- On-time delivery rate is 86.1%, below the 90% high-performance benchmark
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed
- Finished Product Inspection data is not provided
- Specific product certifications and quality management certifications are not provided
- Review volume is moderate at 30+, not extensive

Growth potential:
The supplier has strong platform credibility and a solid factory base. If it improves delivery reliability above 90% and provides clearer quality inspection, certification, and customization documentation, it could become a stronger candidate for larger or more compliance-sensitive procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangzhou Super Clean Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Super Clean Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Four Seas Global Link Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Four Seas Global Link Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Nasda Clean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Nasda Clean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Broad Clean Air Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Broad Clean Air Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Clean Pco Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Clean Pco Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Bofan Filtration Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Bofan Filtration Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anqing Clean Dental Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anqing Clean Dental Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shouguang Clean Water Tank Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shouguang Clean Water Tank Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiaxing All-Link Houseware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiaxing All-Link Houseware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Link Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Link Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Link Sense Intelligent Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Link Sense Intelligent Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Hengzhong Clean Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Hengzhong Clean Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongzhuo Technology Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongzhuo Technology Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Newlink Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Newlink Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Luxun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Luxun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Boente Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Boente Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yule Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yule Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Gcraftsman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Gcraftsman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xuanzhi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xuanzhi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Vscam Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Vscam Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Yangzhou Wansheng Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Wansheng Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Baiyue Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Baiyue Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Benming New Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Benming New Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jufengsheng Cloth Industry Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jufengsheng Cloth Industry Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Jiaxinqi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Jiaxinqi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
K-Air Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
K-Air Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sac Tech. Dev. (Chongqing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sac Tech. Dev. (Chongqing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kebang Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kebang Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Glory Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Glory Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Honlin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Honlin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Owen Electro-Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Owen Electro-Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huanyu Dream Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huanyu Dream Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Hainiu Anti Corrosion Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Hainiu Anti Corrosion Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hongburg Flavormaker (Tianjin) Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hongburg Flavormaker (Tianjin) Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jinjie Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jinjie Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Jesen Pos Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Jesen Pos Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhongtai Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhongtai Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xin Ji Geshida Apparel&Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xin Ji Geshida Apparel&Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shangying Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shangying Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yongkang Jiemeida Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yongkang Jiemeida Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026