Chongqing Jiaxinqi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Chongqing Jiaxinqi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Chongqing, with a reported factory area of 1,700+㎡ and 40+ staff. The company appears to operate as a small-to-medium production supplier with verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 3 years, and Trade Assurance support. Its listed product portfolio is focused on helmet-related products, including PP, ABS, full-face, half-face, kids, open-face, and modular helmet items, with low MOQs ranging from 2 to 4 pieces or packs. Commercial performance shows 100+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.5 store rating and 40+ reviews. Service responsiveness is marked as within 4 hours, while on-time delivery is 84.1%. Overall, this supplier is suitable for small to mid-sized buyers, trial orders, marketplace sellers, and buyers seeking low MOQ helmet products. Key limitations include moderate delivery performance and insufficient data on customization, finished product inspection, and detailed quality certification systems.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Chongqing, China
- Factory area: 1,700+㎡
- Employees: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical production base with a reported factory area of over 1,700㎡ and more than 40 employees. This indicates a real operating structure rather than a purely trading profile, especially when combined with verified supplier status. However, the scale is not large compared with major industrial manufacturers, and the available data does not show multiple production sites, large workforce size, advanced production lines, or detailed annual capacity.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic and credible manufacturing capability, supported by factory area, staff count, and supplier verification. Its production scale appears sufficient for small to moderate procurement needs, but the available data does not support classification as a large-scale or highly mature supply chain. The lack of detailed production capacity, equipment information, and factory audit depth limits the score.

Final Score
13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / platform labels: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 84.1%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. A 3-year Gold Supplier history provides a reasonable platform track record, though it is not long enough to indicate long-term platform maturity. The available labels mainly relate to response time and delivery performance rather than product compliance, factory certification, or industry-specific quality certification.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has core platform trust mechanisms in place, especially Trade Assurance and verified supplier status. These reduce basic transaction risk for buyers. However, compliance credibility remains moderate because the data does not include detailed factory audit reports, product certifications, export compliance certificates, or a broader set of verified certification labels. The 3-year platform history supports credibility but does not reach the level of a long-established supplier.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 100+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: 4.5
- Reviews: 40+

Elaboration
The supplier has visible recent commercial activity, with more than 100 orders in the past six months and transaction value above CN¥67.6K. The store rating of 4.5 indicates generally positive buyer satisfaction, while 40+ reviews provide some level of market validation. However, the transaction amount is moderate, and the review count is not large enough to indicate strong high-volume international trading performance.

Scoring Rationale
The order count shows active sales and a functioning commercial operation. The supplier is not unproven, but the transaction value and review base remain relatively limited. This suggests the company is commercially active at a small-to-medium level rather than being a high-volume supplier with extensive market validation. The 4.5 rating supports a positive assessment but does not fully offset the moderate transaction scale.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for normal sourcing discussions. This is suitable for buyers who need timely quotation handling and basic order coordination. However, there is no provided evidence that the supplier supports Full Customization, design development, private labeling, OEM/ODM services, or complex customization workflows.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates reasonable communication responsiveness, but not the highest service level defined by the scoring standard, which requires response time within 1 hour and strong customization capability. Since customization information is insufficient, the score is limited to a normal service capability range rather than a strong service capability rating.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 84.1%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 84.1% falls within the 80% to 89% range. This indicates a moderate delivery performance level, with most orders likely shipped on schedule, but with a noticeable risk of delays. For buyers with strict replenishment cycles or seasonal sales windows, this delivery metric requires monitoring.

Scoring Rationale
According to the defined scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7 to 8 points. At 84.1%, the supplier is positioned in the middle of this band. The performance is acceptable but not strong enough to be considered highly reliable.

Final Score
7 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.5
- Reviews: 40+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a 4.5 store rating and more than 40 reviews, indicating generally favorable customer feedback. Verified supplier status adds some credibility to the supplier profile. However, the data does not provide evidence of Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory verification scope, product testing, quality certifications, or inspection procedures. For helmet-related products, quality assurance data would be especially important, but no specific certification or inspection system is provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale
Customer feedback is positive but based on a moderate number of reviews. The supplier has some quality credibility through verified supplier status and buyer ratings, but the absence of explicit finished product inspection and detailed quality assurance evidence limits the assessment. The supplier can be considered acceptable for preliminary sourcing, but buyers should not treat the current data as proof of a comprehensive quality control system.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

72 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers seeking low-MOQ helmet-related products from a small-to-medium supplier with basic platform credibility and visible recent transaction activity. The supplier is most suitable for trial orders, small batch purchasing, marketplace sellers, and buyers who can conduct their own quality checks before scaling order volume.

Main risk points include moderate on-time delivery performance at 84.1%, limited evidence of advanced quality control systems, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and insufficient data on customization capability. The company’s growth potential lies in its verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, active order history, and accessible MOQ structure. Before larger procurement commitments, buyers should request product compliance documents, inspection reports, production capacity details, and clarification on customization and quality control procedures.