Lanzhou Jintudi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Lanzhou Jintudi Plastic Products Co., Ltd.
Country/Region: China, Gansu
Evaluation Basis: User-provided supplier data only

Executive Summary

Lanzhou Jintudi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. appears to be a mid-sized Chinese supplier focused on agricultural plastic products, including silage bags, PE corn silage-related products, irrigation/hydroponics equipment, and plastic locking nut/plug components. The company reports a factory area of over 23,000㎡ and more than 90 staff, supported by verified supplier status, indicating a certain level of manufacturing infrastructure and platform credibility. On -related indicators, the supplier has 5 years of Gold Supplier status, supports Trade Assurance, and shows 100% on-time delivery, which strengthens procurement confidence.

However, business validation remains moderate: the past six months show 10+ orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value, while customer feedback is limited to only 1 review despite a 5.0 store rating. Service response is within 3 hours, but no data is provided regarding Full Customization or Finished Product Inspection. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking agricultural plastic products with moderate order volumes and platform-backed transaction protection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory area: 23,000+㎡
• Employees: 90+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product coverage includes agricultural plastic products such as silage bags, irrigation/hydroponics equipment, PE corn silage products, and plastic locking nut/plug components.

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area exceeding 23,000㎡, which suggests a reasonably established production site rather than a small trading-only operation. The workforce size of over 90 staff indicates a mid-sized operational structure with basic production and order-handling capacity. The presence of verified supplier status further supports the view that the company has undergone some form of platform or supplier verification.

However, the provided data does not include detailed production line numbers, annual capacity, machinery information, export volume, factory audit reports, or specific manufacturing certifications. Therefore, while the factory size and employee count support a stable manufacturing profile, the depth of production capability cannot be fully confirmed from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

This supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory. The factory area is relatively strong, and employee count is adequate for regular production activities, but the absence of detailed capacity data or formal factory certification information prevents it from being rated as a large-scale, highly proven supply chain operation. Verified supplier status adds credibility, but it is not sufficient by itself to justify a top-tier score.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform/industry labels:
• Response time ≤3h
• On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates solid platform credibility through 5 years of Gold Supplier membership and support for Trade Assurance. A 5-year history suggests the supplier has maintained platform presence over a meaningful period, which is positive for buyers seeking continuity and traceability. Trade Assurance provides buyers with additional transaction protection within the platform environment.

The supplier also carries operational performance labels, including response time within 3 hours and 100% on-time delivery. These platform indicators support confidence in communication and fulfillment reliability. However, the data does not list third-party management system certifications, product certifications, or detailed compliance certificates. Therefore, the platform credibility is strong, but broader compliance depth remains partially unverified.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, 5-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These are strong indicators for platform-based sourcing. The score is not at the absolute maximum because certification completeness beyond platform indicators is not provided, and there is no detailed compliance documentation in the available data.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 10+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥270.4K+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 10 orders over the past six months, with a transaction value exceeding CN¥270.4K. This indicates that the supplier has recent commercial activity and is not inactive on the platform. The transaction amount suggests some real buyer engagement, though the order count remains relatively limited.

The store rating is 5.0, which is positive, but it is based on only 1 review. This makes the rating statistically weak as a measure of broad customer satisfaction. A larger review base would be needed to confirm consistent buyer experience across multiple transactions. Overall, business performance is present and measurable, but not yet strong enough to be considered high-volume or extensively market-validated.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows real transaction history and a reasonable transaction amount, but the number of orders is modest and the review count is very low. The 5.0 rating is favorable but cannot be considered highly reliable due to the limited review sample. This places the supplier in the lower-to-middle range of business validation rather than the high-performance category.

Final Score

13 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Platform label: Response time ≤3h
• Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for routine sourcing inquiries. This is suitable for buyers who require timely quotation follow-up, product clarification, and order coordination. The response performance is also reflected in the platform label, which adds consistency to the available service data.

However, no information is provided regarding Full Customization, OEM/ODM capacity, packaging customization, design support, sample development, or engineering support. As a result, the supplier’s ability to serve highly customized projects cannot be confirmed. The available service data supports basic communication capability but does not provide enough evidence for advanced service capability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs reasonably well on response speed, but the lack of customization-related information limits the service score. Since Full Customization is specifically part of the evaluation standard and no supporting data is provided, the supplier cannot be rated in the highest service range. The score reflects adequate communication but uncertain customization capability.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator provided in the dataset. This suggests that completed platform orders have been shipped within the committed timeline. For procurement teams, this is a positive sign, especially when sourcing agricultural plastic products where seasonal demand and delivery timing may be important.

However, the delivery score should still be viewed alongside the limited order volume of 10+ orders in the past six months. A 100% rate is excellent, but its robustness would be stronger if supported by a larger transaction base. Based strictly on the scoring rule, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery performance range.

Scoring Rationale

The evaluation standard assigns 9–10 points for on-time delivery above 90%. With a reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate, the supplier meets the top scoring threshold. Although the order volume is not very high, the stated delivery performance is clear and positive.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided; detailed factory verification documentation not provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is positive from a customer feedback perspective. However, this rating is based on only 1 review, making the feedback base too limited to provide strong evidence of consistent quality performance. A single review cannot fully validate quality stability across different products, batches, buyers, or order sizes.

The supplier’s verified status provides some quality-related confidence because it indicates a level of supplier validation. However, the dataset does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, quality management certifications, inspection reports, defect rates, or after-sales handling records. Therefore, the quality assurance system cannot be considered fully demonstrated based on the available data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives credit for a perfect rating and verified supplier status, but the very low number of reviews significantly limits the reliability of customer feedback. The absence of Finished Product Inspection information also prevents a higher score. The supplier appears to have basic quality credibility, but quality assurance depth remains insufficiently documented.

Final Score

13 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditionally Recommended

Lanzhou Jintudi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. is recommended for buyers seeking agricultural plastic products with moderate procurement volume, especially where Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and strong on-time delivery performance are important. The supplier is suitable for buyers sourcing silage bags, irrigation/hydroponics-related plastic products, PE corn silage products, and plastic locking nut/plug components, based strictly on the product data provided.

The main strengths are its 23,000+㎡ factory area, 90+ staff base, 5-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate. These indicators suggest a reasonably stable sourcing option.

Key risks include limited customer feedback, with only 1 review, modest recent order volume of 10+ orders, and insufficient data on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory audits, production capacity, and formal quality certifications. Buyers should request samples, inspection arrangements, production capability details, and quality control documents before placing larger or long-term orders.

Growth potential exists if the supplier can accumulate more verified transactions, expand customer reviews, and provide clearer documentation on quality inspection and customization capabilities.