Foshan Alpicool Holding Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Foshan Alpicool Holding Group Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering refrigerator deodorizer and odor-removal products with listed MOQs of 1,000 pieces across the provided product range. The company shows strong manufacturing fundamentals, supported by a reported factory area of 63,000+ ㎡, 2,000+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is also relatively solid, with 6 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. However, the supplier’s recent commercial performance is weak based on the provided data: only 2 orders and CN¥3.3K+ transaction value in the past six months, with no store rating and 0 reviews. Delivery performance is a major concern, as the reported on-time delivery rate is 0.0%. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for buyers who prioritize factory scale and platform-backed sourcing, but it requires careful verification on delivery reliability, quality assurance, and actual service capability before placing large-volume orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 63,000+ ㎡
- Employees: 2,000+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Guangdong, China

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a large operational footprint based on both factory area and employee count. A 63,000+ ㎡ facility and 2,000+ staff indicate substantial production infrastructure compared with small or workshop-level suppliers. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of the company’s basic manufacturing profile.

Scoring Rationale
The company fits the category of a large-scale supplier with strong production foundations. The available data supports a high score because factory size, staffing, and verification are all present. However, no additional factory audit certificate details or specific production capacity figures are provided, so the score is not placed at the absolute maximum.

Final Score: 19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / platform labels: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 0.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively established presence with 6 years of Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support. These are meaningful platform credibility indicators. Verified supplier status also strengthens trust at the platform level. However, the provided certification labels are limited and do not show broader compliance certifications, product certifications, or detailed audit documentation.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, multi-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and verification. This supports a strong score. The score is moderated because certification completeness is limited in the provided data, and the listed on-time delivery label is negative rather than confidence-building.

Final Score: 17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 2
- Transaction amount in past 6 months: CN¥3.3K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The recent transaction record is limited. Two orders and CN¥3.3K+ in six months suggest low recent commercial activity on the platform. The absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews also reduce the strength of buyer-side validation.

Scoring Rationale
Although the company has strong factory fundamentals, business performance must be evaluated based on actual recent platform transaction data. The low order count, low transaction value, missing store rating, and lack of reviews indicate insufficient commercial proof. This places the supplier below the “low transaction scale” range and into the weak commercial validation category.

Final Score: 8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Product listing includes OEM/ODM wording in one product title, but no formal service capability data is provided

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of ≤3 hours indicates acceptable communication responsiveness, though it does not meet the highest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. There is no explicit data confirming Full Customization support in the service capability field. While one product title mentions OEM/ODM, this alone is not sufficient to confirm full customization capability under the provided scoring rules.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows normal communication efficiency, which supports a moderate service score. However, because confirmed Full Customization data is missing, the score cannot reach the highest range. The score reflects responsive but not fully verified service capability.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 0.0%

Elaboration
The provided on-time delivery rate is the weakest operational indicator in the dataset. A 0.0% on-time delivery rate indicates that, based on the available platform data, there is no demonstrated recent record of timely shipment performance.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, delivery performance below 70% should receive below 5 points. Since the reported rate is 0.0%, the supplier receives a very low delivery score. This is one of the main procurement risk factors.

Final Score: 2 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status is provided, but no detailed Factory Verification or inspection system data is provided

Elaboration
Quality and customer feedback data are limited. There are no customer reviews and no store rating, so buyer satisfaction cannot be assessed from the provided dataset. Finished Product Inspection information is also not provided. Verified supplier status offers some basic credibility, but it does not substitute for direct quality feedback or inspection evidence.

Scoring Rationale
The lack of reviews, missing rating, and absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection significantly limit confidence in quality consistency. The verified supplier status prevents the score from being extremely low, but the available data is insufficient to support a medium or high quality-feedback score.

Final Score: 7 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 60 / 100

• Company Strength: 19 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 17 / 20
• Business Performance: 8 / 20
• Service Capability: 7 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 2 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 7 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended with caution. Foshan Alpicool Holding Group Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers who value large factory scale, platform credibility, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. However, it is not yet suitable for risk-sensitive large-volume procurement without further checks.

The main risks are weak recent business validation, 0 reviews, missing store rating, insufficient quality inspection data, and especially the 0.0% on-time delivery rate. Buyers should request recent shipment records, quality inspection documents, product samples, and written delivery commitments before bulk orders. The supplier’s growth potential lies in its large factory base and established platform presence, but its commercial and delivery performance must improve to support stronger procurement confidence.