Xingyuan Holding Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Xingyuan Holding Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of over 120,000㎡ and more than 400 staff. Based on the provided data, the company shows strong physical capacity and supplier verification support, making it more suitable for buyers seeking medium-to-large-volume procurement of adhesive film/book cover related products with a MOQ of 2,000 rolls. Its platform credibility is supported by 6 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. Commercial performance is mixed: the supplier has achieved CN¥2.2M+ transaction value in the past six months, but only 10+ orders and 3 reviews are reported. Service and delivery indicators are acceptable but not top-tier, with response time within 6 hours and on-time delivery at 87.5%. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers prioritizing factory scale and platform protection, while quality validation should be further confirmed before large orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company: Xingyuan Holding Co., Ltd.
• Location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 120,000+㎡
• Employees: 400+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a very large factory area exceeding 120,000㎡ and a workforce of more than 400 employees. These indicators suggest a substantial operational base compared with small workshop-type suppliers. The presence of verified supplier status further strengthens the credibility of the company’s physical and organizational profile.

However, the provided data does not include details about production lines, annual output, machinery, warehouse capacity, or specific factory certifications beyond the verified supplier status. Therefore, while the company appears strong in scale, deeper production capability validation would still be needed for strategic sourcing or long-term supply contracts.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of large factory area, 400+ employees, and verified supplier status supports a high score in company strength. The supplier appears to have a stable manufacturing foundation and is not positioned as a small-scale or low-capacity supplier. The score is not at the absolute maximum because detailed production capacity, equipment list, and additional factory certification information are not provided.

Final Score

19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤6h”, “On-time delivery 87.5%”
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has been a Gold Supplier for 6 years, which indicates a relatively established platform presence. Trade Assurance is supported, giving buyers additional transaction protection through the platform. The verified supplier status also adds credibility, especially when combined with a multi-year platform history.

The available certification or industry tag data mainly relates to service and delivery performance rather than formal product certifications or compliance standards. No specific product compliance certificates, quality management system certificates, or export-market certifications are provided. Therefore, platform credibility is strong, but compliance documentation remains incomplete based on the supplied information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several important platform trust indicators: Gold Supplier status, 6-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. These factors justify a high credibility score. However, the lack of detailed certification labels or formal compliance documentation prevents a perfect score.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 10+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.2M+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 3

Elaboration

The supplier has generated CN¥2.2M+ in transaction value over the past six months, which indicates meaningful commercial activity. However, the order count is only listed as 10+, suggesting that the transaction volume may be concentrated in a relatively limited number of orders. The store rating is excellent at 5.0, but the review count is very low, with only 3 reviews available.

This creates a mixed commercial profile: transaction value is relatively strong, but buyer feedback volume and order frequency are limited. For procurement teams, this means the supplier has demonstrated sales capability, but the level of market validation through repeated buyer reviews remains insufficient.

Scoring Rationale

The CN¥2.2M+ transaction amount supports a solid business performance score, while the 5.0 rating is positive. However, the low number of reviews and only 10+ orders in six months reduce the strength of commercial validation. The supplier appears commercially active but not yet strongly proven by broad buyer feedback.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤6h
• Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
• Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported response time of within 6 hours indicates acceptable communication responsiveness. This is suitable for standard sourcing communication and initial quotation handling. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, design adaptation, packaging customization, private label service, or technical consultation.

Because customization capability is an important service indicator, the absence of this information limits the evaluation. Buyers requiring customized specifications should request confirmation before order placement.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤6 hours is reasonable but does not meet the highest service benchmark of response within 1 hour. In addition, there is no provided evidence of Full Customization capability. Therefore, the supplier receives a moderate service score, reflecting acceptable responsiveness but insufficient proof of advanced service capability.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 87.5%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 87.5%. This falls within the 80%–89% range, indicating generally acceptable delivery reliability but not best-in-class performance. For buyers with flexible schedules or standard replenishment cycles, this level may be manageable. However, for time-sensitive procurement, seasonal campaigns, or strict delivery windows, the current delivery performance may require additional monitoring.

No further data is provided regarding average lead time, delay reasons, logistics options, or historical shipment consistency.

Scoring Rationale

According to the delivery scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% should receive 7–8 points. At 87.5%, the supplier is near the upper end of this range but still below the 90% threshold required for a top delivery score.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Reviews: 3
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification / Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is positive. However, the review count is only 3, meaning the rating is based on a very limited feedback sample. This reduces the reliability of the rating as a broad quality indicator.

The supplier is marked as verified, which supports basic confidence in company authenticity or factory-related verification. However, there is no provided information confirming Finished Product Inspection, quality control procedures, defect rate, inspection reports, or quality certifications. Therefore, quality assurance cannot be fully validated from the available data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier benefits from a perfect store rating and verified supplier status, but the low review count and absence of Finished Product Inspection information significantly limit quality confidence. The score reflects a supplier with positive but insufficiently broad customer feedback and incomplete quality assurance visibility.

Final Score

13 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Xingyuan Holding Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking adhesive film, self-adhesive book cover, PVC menu/book cover, and related roll-based products with a MOQ of 2,000 rolls. The supplier is especially appropriate for customers prioritizing large factory scale, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and established platform presence.

Suitable customer types:
- Medium-to-large-volume buyers
- Buyers comfortable with MOQ of 2,000 rolls
- Buyers seeking platform-protected transactions
- Procurement teams requiring suppliers with large factory scale and verified status

Main risk points:
- Only 3 customer reviews, limiting feedback reliability
- 10+ orders in the past six months, indicating limited order-volume validation
- On-time delivery rate of 87.5%, below the 90% high-performance benchmark
- No provided evidence of Full Customization capability
- Finished Product Inspection status is Insufficient Data
- Product compliance certifications are Insufficient Data

Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong growth potential due to its large factory area, 400+ staff base, 6-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and CN¥2.2M+ transaction value in the past six months. Before placing large or long-term orders, buyers should request quality inspection details, customization confirmation, production capacity documentation, and sample validation.