zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Huizhou Jin Yuan Xiang Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Huizhou Jin Yuan Xiang Electronic Co., Ltd.

Huizhou Jin Yuan Xiang Electronic Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Huizhou Jin Yuan Xiang Electronic Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based Chinese supplier focused on sensor-related products and components, including temperature/humidity sensors, stainless steel sensor shells, plastic sensor cases, and customized industrial sensor-related items. Based on the provided data, the company has a modest but operational manufacturing base of 1,200+㎡ and 40+ staff, supported by verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, with 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and multiple platform capability labels including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, and Full Customization. Commercial performance appears stable, with 100+ orders and CN¥473.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, although the review count remains limited at 10. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ sensor components, customized sensor assemblies, or small-to-medium batch procurement with platform-backed transaction protection. Key risks relate to limited scale and relatively low customer feedback volume.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 1,200+㎡
  • Employees: 40+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical manufacturing presence with a factory area exceeding 1,200㎡ and more than 40 employees. This indicates a small-to-medium production setup rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturing operation. The presence of verified supplier status strengthens the credibility of the factory’s existence and basic operational capability. However, the provided data does not include detailed production capacity, equipment lists, annual output, production lines, or major factory audit certificates beyond the verified supplier indication.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability and some degree of operational stability. The factory size and staff count are sufficient for small-to-medium batch production, especially for sensor components and customized products with relatively low MOQs. However, compared with large-scale suppliers, the factory area and workforce are limited, and there is insufficient data on production automation, capacity utilization, or advanced factory certifications. Therefore, it should not be classified as a large-scale stable supply chain, but it does qualify as a small-to-medium verified manufacturing supplier.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Platform/industry labels: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 7 years, which indicates a relatively long platform operating history. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with transaction protection through the platform. The supplier also carries several capability and compliance-related labels, including Finished Product Inspection and Warranty Available, which support basic quality and after-sales confidence. ODM service and Full Customization labels further suggest platform-recognized customization capability.

Scoring Rationale

A 7-year Gold Supplier history, combined with Trade Assurance and multiple capability labels, represents a strong platform credibility profile. The supplier has more than basic platform presence and demonstrates continuity on . While the data does not provide third-party management system certifications such as ISO or product compliance certificates, the platform-level credibility indicators are complete and commercially meaningful. This supports a high score, though not a perfect score due to insufficient data on independent certification systems beyond labels.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥473.2K+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Number of reviews: 10

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 100 orders over the past six months, with transaction value exceeding CN¥473.2K. This indicates an active commercial operation with repeat or ongoing buyer engagement. The store rating of 4.9 is strong and suggests positive buyer satisfaction among available reviewers. However, the number of reviews is only 10, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating.

Scoring Rationale

The order volume and transaction amount show stable business activity, especially for a supplier with low-MOQ products. The transaction value is meaningful but does not indicate very large-scale trading performance. The 4.9 rating is positive, but the limited review count reduces confidence in long-term customer validation. Overall, the supplier demonstrates moderate-to-good business performance, but the evidence is not strong enough to justify a top-tier score reserved for suppliers with high order volume, high transaction value, and extensive review history.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Full Customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as within 3 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency for online sourcing. The platform labels confirm Full Customization and ODM service availability, suggesting the supplier can support customized product requirements rather than only standard off-the-shelf items. This is relevant for buyers sourcing sensor assemblies, sensor housings, or customized sensor-related components.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good service profile due to customization capability and ODM support. However, the response time is not within the strongest category of ≤1 hour. Based on the scoring standard, suppliers with ≤1 hour response time and strong customization capability qualify for 9–10 points. Since this supplier responds within 3 hours, it remains serviceable and commercially practical but does not reach the highest service tier. The Full Customization label supports an above-average score.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time shipping rate: 94.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 94.0% on-time shipping rate. This is above the 90% threshold specified for the highest delivery performance range. A delivery rate above 90% suggests the supplier generally maintains reliable dispatch discipline and can support buyers who require predictable shipment timelines.

Scoring Rationale

According to the defined scoring standard, suppliers with on-time delivery performance above 90% qualify for 9–10 points. At 94.0%, the supplier meets the high-performance delivery category. Since the provided data does not include average lead time, late shipment causes, or historical delivery trend details, a strong but not automatically perfect score is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Number of reviews: 10
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive indicator of buyer satisfaction. The presence of Finished Product Inspection indicates a platform-recognized quality control process at the finished goods stage. Verified supplier status and warranty availability further support the supplier’s quality credibility. However, the total number of reviews is only 10, which is relatively limited and reduces the depth of available customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several favorable quality indicators: high rating, finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These suggest a basic quality assurance structure and positive customer experience. However, the low review count means the rating is based on a narrow feedback sample. There is also insufficient data on defect rates, inspection standards, product compliance certifications, or quality management system certifications. Therefore, the supplier deserves a good score but not a top-tier quality score.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 14 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Huizhou Jin Yuan Xiang Electronic Co., Ltd. is recommended for buyers seeking small-to-medium batch procurement of sensor-related products and customized components, especially where low MOQ, Trade Assurance protection, and customization capability are important. The supplier is suitable for sample orders, customized development orders, replacement components, and moderate-volume purchasing.

Suitable Customer Types: - Buyers sourcing temperature/humidity sensor components
- Small and medium manufacturers requiring customized sensor assemblies or housings
- Importers seeking low-MOQ sensor-related products
- Buyers who prefer Trade Assurance protection

Main Risk Points: - Factory scale is limited, with 1,200+㎡ and 40+ staff
- Customer review volume is low at 10 reviews
- Insufficient data on production capacity, equipment, defect rate, and formal quality management certifications
- Response time is acceptable but not top-tier at ≤3h

Growth Potential: The supplier shows solid platform credibility, active recent transactions, customization capability, and strong delivery performance. If it can expand customer feedback volume, disclose more quality certifications, and provide clearer production capacity data, its procurement attractiveness could improve further.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Dongguan Wan Yuan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Wan Yuan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Hefa Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Hefa Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Winpow Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Winpow Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Magtop Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Magtop Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Jiadalong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Jiadalong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Longzhixin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Longzhixin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Shangmeijia Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Shangmeijia Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peng Ze Xiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peng Ze Xiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yong Jin Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yong Jin Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jin Hua Loyal Crafts Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jin Hua Loyal Crafts Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wan Yuan Transmission Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wan Yuan Transmission Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jin Bao Brother Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jin Bao Brother Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Hong Yuan Feather Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Hong Yuan Feather Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Jin Yi Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Jin Yi Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Jin Tie Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Jin Tie Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Dabo Jin Integrated Housing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Dabo Jin Integrated Housing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Kang Sheng Yuan Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Kang Sheng Yuan Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Niu Yuan Hardware Product Co,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Niu Yuan Hardware Product Co,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ricoma (Huizhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ricoma (Huizhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jinyu Mechanical And Electrical Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jinyu Mechanical And Electrical Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Anshan Zhongjda Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anshan Zhongjda Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bohao Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bohao Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Tracy Future Tech Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Tracy Future Tech Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Evergreen Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Evergreen Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Mingze Rubber & Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Mingze Rubber & Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Maxwin Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Maxwin Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sanfod Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sanfod Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Techence Forging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Techence Forging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zeyue Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zeyue Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yipinshidai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yipinshidai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zhongyi Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zhongyi Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Maidean Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Maidean Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Meker Hvac Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Meker Hvac Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xin Xin Da Communication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xin Xin Da Communication Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yongdi Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yongdi Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huamo Environmental Protection Technology (Hainan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huamo Environmental Protection Technology (Hainan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yifa Holding Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yifa Holding Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou Dacheng Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou Dacheng Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pinghu Yuehao Paper Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pinghu Yuehao Paper Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Lebon Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Lebon Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026