Shengzhou Dacheng Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Shengzhou Dacheng Textile Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Shengzhou Dacheng Textile Co., Ltd. is a Zhejiang-based textile supplier in China with a reported factory area of 3,000+ m² and 110+ staff. The company appears to operate as a medium-sized manufacturing supplier with verified supplier status, long-term Gold Supplier history of 18 years, Trade Assurance support, and platform tags including “Socially responsible,” “Low MOQ for customization,” and “Finished product inspection.” Its product listings focus on woven jacquard, polyester handmade, plaid, seasonal, and dot-design necktie-related textile products, with low MOQ levels of 20 pieces. Commercial performance is supported by 100+ orders and CN¥743.7K+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.9 store rating and 20+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ textile accessories with customization potential and relatively reliable platform-backed transaction protection. Key limitations include limited review volume and incomplete data on full customization depth beyond listed customization-related tags.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 3,000+ m²
• Employees: 110+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product range shown includes woven jacquard, polyester handmade, plaid, seasonal, and dot-design necktie-related products.

Elaboration

The supplier has a measurable manufacturing base with 3,000+ m² of factory area and more than 110 staff, indicating a structured production operation rather than a purely trading-oriented profile based on the provided data. The staff size and facility area suggest the company has the capacity to handle regular small-to-medium order volumes. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s physical and operational presence.

However, the data does not provide information on annual output, production lines, equipment quantity, monthly capacity, export markets, or major customer references. Therefore, while the company demonstrates clear manufacturing capability, there is insufficient evidence to classify it as a large-scale supply chain operator.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory. Its factory area and workforce are sufficient for consistent textile accessory production, and verified supplier status strengthens its operational credibility. The absence of detailed capacity metrics prevents a higher score in the large-scale category.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 18 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Socially responsible
• Low MOQ for customization
• Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile, particularly due to its 18-year Gold Supplier history. This is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence and continuity. Trade Assurance support also improves buyer protection by providing transaction-level safeguards through the platform.

The available certification and industry tags show that the supplier is associated with social responsibility, low-MOQ customization, and finished product inspection. These tags improve its compliance and purchasing reliability profile. However, the provided data does not include specific third-party audit names, formal factory certification standards, ISO certifications, social compliance audit reports, or detailed certificate documents. Therefore, while the platform credibility is strong, certification completeness cannot be considered fully comprehensive based only on the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The 18-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple platform tags provide strong credibility. The only limitation is the lack of detailed formal certification documentation beyond platform labels.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥743.7K+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Review count: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated active transaction performance over the last six months, with more than 100 orders and transaction value exceeding CN¥743.7K. This reflects a commercially active supplier with recent buyer engagement. The store rating of 4.9 is strong and suggests positive buyer satisfaction based on available reviews.

However, the review count is only 20+, which is supportive but not large enough to represent a very broad customer feedback base. The transaction value is meaningful, but without benchmark data against similar suppliers or average order value, the scale should be interpreted as stable rather than exceptionally high.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 100+ recent orders, CN¥743.7K+ transaction value, and a 4.9 rating supports a strong business performance score. The score is moderated because the review quantity remains relatively limited, reducing the depth of commercial validation.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤1h
• Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
• Product listings include custom logo woven jacquard products
• Explicit Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong response efficiency, with a reported response time of less than or equal to one hour. This is a positive indicator for sourcing communication, quotation clarification, sample discussion, and order follow-up. The presence of “Low MOQ for customization” and product listings referencing custom logo woven jacquard products suggest that the supplier can support some level of customization.

However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” capability. There is no detailed information regarding design development, private label services, packaging customization, material customization, sample lead time, artwork support, or OEM/ODM scope. Therefore, the supplier’s service capability appears good, but not fully proven at an advanced customization level.

Scoring Rationale

The fast response time is a clear strength and supports efficient procurement communication. Customization capability is partially supported by the data, but because Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the score should remain below the highest range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 98.8%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time dispatch rate of 98.8% is very strong. According to the scoring standard, a rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. This level of delivery performance indicates reliable order processing and shipping punctuality based on the available platform data.

No additional data is provided regarding average production lead time, sample lead time, logistics methods, urgent order handling, or seasonal capacity pressure. Therefore, this score is based strictly on the disclosed on-time dispatch rate.

Scoring Rationale

A 98.8% on-time dispatch rate represents excellent delivery reliability and supports the maximum score under the provided scoring rules.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Review count: 20+
• Finished product inspection: Present as platform tag
• Verified supplier: True
• Factory verification: Supplier verification is provided as True; detailed factory verification documentation: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s 4.9 rating indicates strong customer satisfaction from available feedback. The “Finished product inspection” tag is a positive quality-control indicator, suggesting that finished goods inspection is part of the supplier’s quality-related profile on the platform. Verified supplier status further supports trust in the company’s operational legitimacy.

However, the number of reviews is only 20+, which is useful but not extensive. The data does not provide defect rate, inspection reports, quality certifications, sample approval procedures, AQL standards, return rate, or detailed factory audit documentation. As a result, the supplier appears to have a solid quality foundation, but the evidence is not sufficient to classify its quality assurance system as fully comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The high store rating, finished product inspection tag, and verified supplier status support a favorable quality assessment. The score is limited by the relatively modest review base and insufficient detailed quality system documentation.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, especially for low-to-medium volume textile accessory procurement and low-MOQ customized necktie-related products.

Shengzhou Dacheng Textile Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, fast response time, and excellent delivery performance. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking stable sourcing of woven jacquard, polyester, plaid, seasonal, and custom logo textile accessory products with relatively low MOQ requirements.

Suitable customer types include: - Small and medium-sized brands requiring low-MOQ textile accessories
- Buyers seeking custom logo woven jacquard or related necktie products
- Importers or distributors needing platform-backed Trade Assurance
- Procurement teams prioritizing fast supplier response and reliable dispatch performance

Main risks: - Limited review count of 20+, which restricts the depth of customer feedback validation
- Insufficient data on full customization capability
- Insufficient data on detailed production capacity, equipment, monthly output, and formal quality certifications
- Insufficient data on detailed factory audit reports beyond verified supplier status

Growth potential: The supplier has strong growth potential in low-MOQ customized textile accessories due to its 18-year platform history, active recent transactions, high rating, fast response time, and strong delivery reliability. With more transparent quality documentation, expanded review volume, and clearer customization capability disclosure, the supplier could become more attractive for larger or more demanding procurement programs.