zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd.

Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of over 15,000㎡ and more than 70 staff. The company appears to operate as a medium-sized manufacturing supplier, supported by verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 2 years, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and ODM service availability. Its listed products are mainly ceramic WC / floor-mounted and wall-related sanitary products, with low MOQs ranging from 1 to 5 pieces, indicating flexibility for trial orders and smaller buyers. Business performance shows 40+ orders and CN¥1.4M+ transaction value over the past six months, which reflects active commercial traction, though the review count is limited at 4. With an 88.0% on-time dispatch rate and response time within 4 hours, the supplier is suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale sourcing with customization needs, while quality validation should be strengthened before large-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 15,000+㎡
  • Staff size: 70+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area exceeding 15,000㎡, which indicates a meaningful physical production base. The workforce of 70+ staff suggests a moderate operational scale rather than a very large industrial organization. The verified supplier status provides additional support that the company has undergone some form of supplier or factory verification on the platform. However, no detailed annual production capacity, equipment list, production line quantity, export volume, or factory audit report details were provided.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates stronger-than-small-factory fundamentals due to its factory size and verified supplier status. However, the employee count remains moderate, and the absence of detailed production capacity data limits the ability to classify it as a large-scale, highly stable supply chain. Based on the available information, it fits the “medium-sized stable factory” category rather than a top-tier large-scale supplier.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, Full customization, ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are positive signs for platform-level transaction security and supplier transparency. The available labels also show practical service and quality-related capabilities, including warranty availability and finished product inspection. However, the Gold Supplier period is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with suppliers with long-term platform histories. No additional third-party product certifications or international compliance certificates were provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core credibility elements expected from a platform-verified supplier, especially Trade Assurance and verified supplier status. The main limitation is the short Gold Supplier history and lack of provided external certification details. Therefore, the supplier is credible at a platform level but does not yet reach the highest credibility tier associated with long-term proven platform presence and comprehensive certification documentation.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 40+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.4M+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Number of reviews: 4

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 40 orders and over CN¥1.4M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active commercial performance and a certain level of buyer acceptance. The store rating of 4.7 is positive, suggesting generally favorable buyer satisfaction among available reviews. However, the number of reviews is only 4, which is a very limited sample size and reduces the reliability of the rating as a broad performance indicator.

Scoring Rationale

The order count and transaction value show a reasonable level of recent business activity, placing the supplier above low-activity vendors. However, the limited review count prevents the supplier from being considered strongly market-validated. The business performance is therefore assessed as stable but not yet highly proven through large-scale buyer feedback.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤4h
  • Full customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available

Elaboration

A response time within 4 hours is acceptable for normal procurement communication, though it is not at the fastest level of ≤1 hour. The availability of Full Customization and ODM service indicates that the supplier can support customized requirements rather than only standard product transactions. This is particularly relevant for buyers needing design, specification, or branding adjustments. However, no detailed customization workflow, sample lead time, engineering team size, or after-sales service process was provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates solid service capability due to its customization and ODM support. The response speed is reasonable but does not meet the top-tier benchmark of ≤1 hour. As a result, the supplier is suitable for buyers with customization needs, but service responsiveness should be monitored during quotation, sampling, and order execution stages.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 88.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is 88.0%, which falls within the 80%–89% range. This suggests generally acceptable delivery execution, but it also indicates that there is still some risk of delayed shipment. For time-sensitive procurement programs, this delivery level may require additional order tracking, confirmed production schedules, and buffer time in logistics planning.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. Since 88.0% is near the upper end of this range, the supplier receives the higher score within the band. The performance is commercially usable but not yet strong enough to be considered excellent.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Number of reviews: 4
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7, supported by quality-related platform labels such as Finished Product Inspection and Warranty Available. Verified supplier status also strengthens the basic quality assurance profile. However, the review count is only 4, which is insufficient for a robust customer feedback assessment. No detailed defect rate, inspection reports, certification documents, product test standards, or historical claim data were provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several useful quality assurance indicators, especially Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability. The rating is good, but the low review volume limits confidence in the consistency of customer satisfaction. Therefore, the supplier can be considered to have a basic-to-good quality control framework, but further verification is required before high-volume or long-term procurement.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 15 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 8 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. is recommended for trial orders, small-to-medium volume procurement, and customized sanitary ceramic product sourcing, especially for buyers who value low MOQ, ODM availability, Full Customization, Trade Assurance, and platform-verified supplier status.

Suitable Customer Types

  • Small and medium importers testing product demand
  • Buyers requiring low MOQ orders
  • Procurement teams seeking customized or ODM sanitary ceramic products
  • Buyers who prefer Trade Assurance protection

Main Risk Points

  • Review count is low, with only 4 reviews, limiting customer feedback reliability
  • Gold Supplier history is relatively short at 2 years
  • On-time dispatch rate is 88.0%, acceptable but not excellent
  • Detailed production capacity, third-party certifications, inspection reports, and customer references are Insufficient Data

Growth Potential

The supplier shows positive development potential due to its 15,000+㎡ factory area, verified supplier status, customization capability, ODM service availability, and recent transaction value of CN¥1.4M+ over six months. If the supplier improves delivery consistency, accumulates more verified customer reviews, and provides more complete quality documentation, it could become a stronger candidate for larger-scale procurement partnerships.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiajianle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiajianle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhifang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhifang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhongyan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhongyan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yufan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yufan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shanan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shanan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Fuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Fuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Eraclean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Eraclean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Empress Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Empress Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Dp Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Dp Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Invitop Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Invitop Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sohoo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sohoo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Henglicai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Henglicai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yidu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yidu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Weide Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Weide Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Dezhou Chuanliang Special Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dezhou Chuanliang Special Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang City Qiangsheng Plastic Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang City Qiangsheng Plastic Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Leadway Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Leadway Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Huamo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Huamo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jacket Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jacket Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jiutouniao Medical Instrumts Endevelopment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jiutouniao Medical Instrumts Endevelopment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Bems Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Bems Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Feng Cheng Machinery Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Feng Cheng Machinery Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Joan Lab Equipment (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Joan Lab Equipment (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jinli Special Rope Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jinli Special Rope Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Toppre Modular House Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Toppre Modular House Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anping Qiangguan Ironware Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Qiangguan Ironware Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sanguan Siyuan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sanguan Siyuan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Qiusheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Qiusheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi East-Sunshine Textile Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi East-Sunshine Textile Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Litharv New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Litharv New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Comstar Office Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Comstar Office Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang O-Noble Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang O-Noble Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taihe County Baiyun Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taihe County Baiyun Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinocoroplast Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinocoroplast Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026