zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd.

Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 9,700+㎡ and 60+ staff. The supplier presents a moderate manufacturing base supported by verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 3 years, Trade Assurance, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service availability, and warranty availability. Its recent platform performance is commercially active, with 400+ orders and CN¥2M+ transaction value over the past six months, indicating meaningful buyer engagement. However, the store rating of 3.9 suggests that customer satisfaction is acceptable but not at a premium level. The supplier’s 94.5% on-time dispatch rate is a strong delivery indicator. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking flexible MOQ, OEM/ODM support, and mid-scale sourcing, while buyers with strict quality consistency requirements should conduct additional sampling and quality checks before bulk orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Final Score: 15 / 20

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 9,700+㎡
  • Employee count: 60+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
  • Product listings include multiple 19–60 inch HD/OEM-related product options
  • MOQ shown as 1 piece across listed products

Elaboration

The supplier has a measurable production base, with a factory area of over 9,700㎡ and more than 60 staff. This indicates that the company is not a purely trading-oriented storefront based on the provided data, and it appears to have a defined physical manufacturing or operational setup. The verified supplier status further strengthens its company profile by showing that some form of platform or supplier verification has been completed.

The employee count of 60+ suggests a small-to-medium operational scale rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturer. The factory area is relatively meaningful, but the workforce size does not indicate a very large production organization. The listed product range shows multiple size options and OEM-related offerings, which suggests production or sourcing flexibility within the provided product category scope.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates a stable mid-sized supplier profile, supported by a sizable factory area and verified supplier status. However, the employee count remains moderate, and the data does not provide detailed production capacity, monthly output, equipment list, production lines, or internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, it should not be scored as a large-scale, highly mature supply chain operator. Based on the available information, it fits the “medium stable factory” range.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Final Score: 16 / 20

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier status: True
  • Certification / industry labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • Full customization
  • ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. A 3-year Gold Supplier history shows a certain level of platform continuity, though it is not yet a long-term record. Trade Assurance availability provides transactional protection for buyers and is a positive compliance-related signal. The verified supplier status also supports the supplier’s credibility.

The listed labels are relevant from a procurement perspective. Finished Product Inspection indicates that the supplier has at least a declared inspection process before shipment. Warranty availability improves buyer confidence, while Full Customization and ODM service availability show that the supplier may support tailored product requirements within the scope of its listed capabilities.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core credibility components expected from a qualified supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and several operational labels. However, the Gold Supplier history is 3 years, which is credible but not long enough to be considered a long-term platform record. No additional third-party certifications, product compliance certificates, or detailed audit reports are provided in the data. As a result, the supplier is credible but not at the highest platform-compliance tier.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Final Score: 16 / 20

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 400+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥2M+
  • Store rating: 3.9
  • Number of reviews: 200+

Elaboration

The supplier shows solid recent commercial activity. More than 400 orders in six months indicates an active storefront with consistent buyer engagement. A transaction value exceeding CN¥2M over the same period further supports that the supplier has completed meaningful sales volume through the platform.

The review count of 200+ provides a reasonable base of customer feedback. However, the store rating of 3.9 is a limiting factor. While it does not indicate a severely weak supplier, it is below the level typically associated with highly rated or premium-performing vendors. This suggests that buyers should pay attention to specific review content, dispute history, product consistency, and after-sales responsiveness before placing larger orders.

Scoring Rationale

The order count and transaction value are both strong indicators of platform activity and business validation. The supplier is not a low-activity or unproven storefront. However, the rating of 3.9 prevents the supplier from reaching the highest scoring band, because high transaction activity combined with only moderate customer satisfaction may indicate variability in buyer experience. Therefore, the supplier is assessed as having stable medium-to-strong business performance, but with quality or service perception risks that require further buyer verification.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Final Score: 8 / 10

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours is commercially acceptable and indicates that inquiries are likely handled within a reasonable timeframe. This is positive for buyers who require pre-order clarification, quotation comparison, sample coordination, or customization discussions.

The presence of Full Customization and ODM service availability is a strong service capability indicator. It suggests that the supplier can potentially support customized specifications or development-related requirements, based strictly on the platform label provided. However, the data does not include details such as engineering team size, customization lead time, design support scope, or case examples.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good service capability because it responds within a reasonable time window and supports customization-related services. However, the response time is not within the ≤1 hour benchmark for the highest score range. In addition, while customization and ODM labels are available, the data does not provide deeper proof of technical service depth or past customized project performance. Therefore, the supplier deserves a strong but not maximum service score.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Final Score: 9 / 10

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 94.5%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate of 94.5% is a strong logistics and fulfillment indicator. According to the scoring framework, performance above 90% falls within the 9–10 point range. This suggests that the supplier has relatively reliable order processing and shipment preparation capability on the platform.

For procurement teams, this is a positive factor, especially when managing replenishment cycles, project deadlines, or time-sensitive deliveries. However, the data only provides dispatch punctuality and does not include full delivery lead time, international shipping performance, delay causes, or historical dispute rates.

Scoring Rationale

A 94.5% on-time dispatch rate is clearly above the 90% threshold and supports a high delivery score. The supplier appears dependable in meeting dispatch commitments. The score is set at 9 rather than 10 because the available data only covers on-time dispatch, not end-to-end delivery performance or logistics reliability after shipment.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Final Score: 15 / 20

Basis

  • Store rating: 3.9
  • Review count: 200+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
  • Warranty available: Yes, based on platform label

Elaboration

The supplier has several positive quality-related indicators. Finished Product Inspection suggests that goods are checked before shipment, which is important for reducing outbound quality risk. Verified supplier status and the factory-related verification indicator also support a baseline level of operational transparency. Warranty availability further strengthens post-sale confidence, although specific warranty terms are not provided.

The review count of 200+ gives a meaningful feedback base, but the store rating of 3.9 is moderate. This indicates that while the supplier has accumulated a reasonable number of customer interactions, the average customer experience is not at a top-tier level. The score therefore needs to balance the supplier’s quality-control labels against the less-than-excellent rating.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic to good quality assurance signals, including Finished Product Inspection and verification status. The number of reviews is sufficient to provide some market feedback credibility. However, the 3.9 rating limits confidence in consistent quality or customer satisfaction. Since no detailed defect rate, inspection standard, product certification, or third-party quality report is provided, the supplier should be considered acceptable but not premium from a quality-risk perspective.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 79 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking a mid-scale supplier with active platform transaction history, low MOQ options, Trade Assurance support, customization capability, and relatively strong dispatch reliability. The supplier is particularly appropriate for trial orders, sample validation, small-batch procurement, OEM/ODM inquiry development, and buyers who value flexible order quantities.

The main risks are the moderate store rating of 3.9 and limited disclosed detail on production capacity, quality certifications, inspection standards, and after-sales terms. Before placing large-volume orders, buyers should request samples, confirm product specifications in writing, clarify warranty conditions, verify customization feasibility, and consider pre-shipment inspection.

Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential due to its active order volume, CN¥2M+ recent transaction value, verified status, and 94.5% on-time dispatch rate. However, quality consistency and customer satisfaction should be monitored closely during early cooperation.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiajianle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiajianle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhifang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhifang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhongyan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhongyan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yufan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yufan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shanan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shanan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Fuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Fuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Eraclean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Eraclean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Empress Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Empress Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Dp Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Dp Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Invitop Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Invitop Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sohoo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sohoo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Henglicai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Henglicai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yidu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yidu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kepuai Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kepuai Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Cenava Industrial Control Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cenava Industrial Control Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ruizhan Plastic Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ruizhan Plastic Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Voler Import And Export Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Voler Import And Export Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Jiuyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Jiuyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bell Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bell Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yupeng Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yupeng Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Tianshuo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Tianshuo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueling Building Materials Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yueling Building Materials Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yang Yang Smart Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yang Yang Smart Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jumi Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jumi Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Cania Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Cania Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shijaizhuang Chenxing Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijaizhuang Chenxing Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinhongfa Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinhongfa Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hochey Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hochey Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shensheng Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shensheng Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lance (Guangzhou) Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lance (Guangzhou) Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Pioneer Seals Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Pioneer Seals Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Borui Food Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Borui Food Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Cop Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Cop Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kangningda Medical Science&Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kangningda Medical Science&Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026