zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangzhou Yupeng Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Yupeng Clothing Co., Ltd. is a China-based apparel supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 2,500+㎡ and 80+ staff. Based on the provided product listings, the company focuses on women’s denim and casual fashion apparel, with low MOQ listings of 2 pieces, indicating suitability for small-batch purchasing, sampling, and flexible online retail replenishment. The supplier has Gold Supplier status for 2 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a basic level of platform credibility. However, its recent commercial performance is limited, with only 4 orders and CN¥611+ transaction value in the past six months. Customer feedback is positive but still limited, with a 4.7 store rating and 10+ reviews. The supplier shows strong delivery reliability with a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, but available data is insufficient to confirm advanced customization, finished product inspection, or broader certification coverage.

Guangzhou Yupeng Clothing Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 2,500+㎡
  • Employees: 80+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product scope shown: women’s denim and casual fashion apparel
  • Factory certification beyond verification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical operating base with a reported factory area above 2,500㎡ and more than 80 employees. This indicates that the company is not a micro-scale trader and has a certain level of organizational and production capacity. The verified supplier status also supports the existence of a checked business or factory profile.

However, the provided data does not show large-scale production capacity indicators such as monthly output, number of production lines, major machinery, export volume, or internationally recognized factory audit certifications. Therefore, while the company appears to have basic-to-medium manufacturing capability, the available evidence does not support classifying it as a large-scale or highly mature supply chain operator.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size and employee base suggest a small-to-medium apparel supplier with basic stable production capability. The verified supplier status improves confidence, but the lack of detailed production scale, audit reports, and factory certification information limits the score. It fits closer to a medium but not large-scale supplier profile.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / platform labels:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Response time ≤2h
  • On-time delivery 100.0%
  • Additional compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements provide a basic layer of transactional security and platform-backed credibility for buyers.

The Gold Supplier history is 2 years, which is positive but still relatively short compared with suppliers that have maintained platform credibility for many years. The listed tags also show operational strengths such as response speed and delivery performance, but they do not represent formal product compliance certifications or internationally recognized audit certificates.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility components: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verified status. However, the 2-year Gold Supplier duration is not long enough to be considered deeply established, and there is insufficient data on broader compliance certifications. Therefore, the score reflects a credible but still developing platform profile.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 4
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥611+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7, which suggests generally favorable buyer feedback from available reviews. However, the total review volume is limited at 10+, and the recent six-month transaction data is relatively low, with only 4 orders and CN¥611+ in transaction value.

This level of commercial activity indicates that the supplier has some transaction history but has not yet demonstrated strong market validation through high order volume, high transaction value, or extensive buyer feedback. For procurement teams, this means the supplier’s business performance should be considered lightly validated rather than strongly proven.

Scoring Rationale

Although the rating is good, the actual transaction scale is low. Four orders and CN¥611+ over six months are insufficient to demonstrate strong commercial momentum or broad buyer acceptance. The score therefore reflects a supplier with basic commercial activity but limited recent performance validation.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Platform tag: Response time ≤2h
  • Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤2 hours indicates relatively efficient communication and acceptable responsiveness for online sourcing. This is useful for buyers who require quick quotation follow-up, sample discussion, or order coordination.

The supplier also carries a “Low MOQ for customization” tag, suggesting some level of customization flexibility at small order quantities. However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability, design development capacity, private label support, packaging customization, or technical design services. Therefore, service capability is positive but cannot be classified as advanced.

Scoring Rationale

The response speed is good, but not within the strongest ≤1 hour category. Customization-related information exists, but only in the form of low MOQ customization, not confirmed full customization. The supplier therefore fits the range of normal-to-good service capability with basic customization flexibility.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
  • Platform tag: On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator available in the provided data. This suggests that, for recorded platform transactions, the supplier has met delivery timelines successfully.

However, the delivery performance should be interpreted together with the low recent order volume. Since the supplier had only 4 orders in the past six months, the 100.0% on-time delivery rate is positive but based on a limited transaction sample.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. A 100.0% rate supports the maximum score. The limited order base is noted as a contextual risk, but the delivery metric itself meets the highest scoring band.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 10+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: True / Verified supplier status provided
  • Additional quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.7 store rating, which is a positive quality and service signal from available buyers. The verified supplier status also provides a basic level of assurance regarding supplier legitimacy or factory verification.

However, the number of reviews is limited at 10+, meaning the feedback base is not yet large enough to strongly validate consistent product quality across many orders. Additionally, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, quality management certifications, or third-party inspection systems. As a result, the quality profile is acceptable but not fully substantiated.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives credit for a good rating and verified status, but the limited review volume and lack of confirmed finished product inspection reduce confidence. The quality system appears basic rather than comprehensive based strictly on the available data.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 14 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 11 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 14 / 20
Total Score 72 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Guangzhou Yupeng Clothing Co., Ltd. can be considered for small-batch procurement, sample orders, online boutique replenishment, and buyers seeking low MOQ women’s denim or casual apparel products. The supplier’s strengths include verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, 2-year Gold Supplier history, fast response within 2 hours, low MOQ product listings, and a 100.0% on-time delivery rate.

The main risks are limited recent transaction volume, low six-month transaction value, limited review base, and insufficient data regarding finished product inspection, full customization capability, production output, and formal quality certifications. Buyers should begin with small trial orders and request additional evidence such as product inspection process details, production capacity information, sample quality confirmation, and order-specific quality standards before scaling procurement.

Overall, the supplier shows reasonable growth potential, especially for flexible, low-volume apparel sourcing, but it is not yet strongly validated for large-volume or compliance-sensitive procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangzhou Woao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Woao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mofei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mofei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kanoshi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kanoshi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Moran Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Moran Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Buyut Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Buyut Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Neohope Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Neohope Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shine Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shine Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Alise Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Alise Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Liangying Clothing Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Liangying Clothing Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou City Tianhe District Shahe Nuanbeier Clothing Store Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou City Tianhe District Shahe Nuanbeier Clothing Store Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Fenteng Clothing Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Fenteng Clothing Factory Supplier Evaluation
Hk Flowers Clothing Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hk Flowers Clothing Limited Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenqiguodu (Shangqiu) Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenqiguodu (Shangqiu) Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Naisen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Naisen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Menglu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Menglu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xixi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xixi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Haiyun Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Haiyun Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tangshan Guye District Hanchuan Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tangshan Guye District Hanchuan Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong Chengda Auto Sales Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chengda Auto Sales Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Taisheng Entertainment Equipment Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Taisheng Entertainment Equipment Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Runder Light Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Runder Light Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Yehuimei Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Yehuimei Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Zhenxiang Vehicle Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Zhenxiang Vehicle Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Masin International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Masin International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Power And Grace Electronic Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Power And Grace Electronic Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Xinming New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Xinming New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Highway Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Highway Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Zhenghan Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Zhenghan Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chenlu International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chenlu International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Soten Technology (Hongkong) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Soten Technology (Hongkong) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Wanjia Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Wanjia Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Linyuanwai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Linyuanwai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Dorlin Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Dorlin Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Home Smart Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Home Smart Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Rst Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Rst Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tengjun Frp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tengjun Frp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yihao Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yihao Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026