Guangzhou Power And Grace Electronic Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Guangzhou Power And Grace Electronic Equipment Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based supplier focused on electronic audio equipment products such as DAB amplifiers, Bluetooth amplifiers, in-wall speaker systems, volume control amplifiers, and related audio products. Based on the provided data, the company shows a moderate physical production base with an 8,200+㎡ factory area, 70+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and platform tags showing response time within 6 hours and 100.0% on-time delivery. Business performance is mixed: the supplier has CN¥405.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, but only 10 orders and 4 customer reviews, which limits commercial validation depth. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking audio equipment with low MOQ options and platform-backed transaction protection. However, buyers should further verify quality control processes, customization capability, and product inspection arrangements before larger-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory area: 8,200+㎡
- Employees: 70+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Guangdong, China
Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated factory scale and workforce, indicating an established production setup rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. An 8,200+㎡ facility and 70+ staff suggest a small-to-medium manufacturing operation with basic production capacity. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and operational legitimacy of the company.
Scoring Rationale
The company does not reach the level of a large-scale supplier because the employee count remains moderate, and no additional factory audit details, production lines, annual capacity, or advanced factory certifications are provided. However, the factory area, workforce, and verified status support a stable mid-sized supplier assessment.
Final Score
16 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/platform tags: “Response time ≤6h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility through a long Gold Supplier history of 9 years and Trade Assurance support. The verified supplier status further strengthens trustworthiness. The listed platform tags provide additional operational signals related to responsiveness and delivery reliability.
Scoring Rationale
A 9-year Gold Supplier history combined with Trade Assurance and verified supplier status represents a relatively complete platform trust framework. However, the data does not include detailed third-party factory audit reports, compliance certificates, or industry-specific certifications, so the score is strong but not perfect.
Final Score
18 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 10
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥405.6K+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 4
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded commercial activity, with CN¥405.6K+ transaction value over the past six months. This indicates some purchasing traction and actual buyer transactions. However, the number of orders is limited at 10, and the review count is very low at 4, reducing the confidence level in broad market validation.
Scoring Rationale
The transaction value is relatively meaningful, but the low order quantity and small review base prevent classification as a high-performing supplier. The 4.7 rating is positive, yet it is based on limited feedback, making the business performance moderate rather than strongly proven.
Final Score
13 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤6h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 6 hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency for standard sourcing and inquiry handling. However, there is no provided evidence regarding Full Customization, design support, OEM/ODM capability, engineering assistance, or dedicated account service.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates normal service responsiveness, but not the strongest service profile under the scoring framework because response time is not within 1 hour and customization capability is not confirmed. Therefore, the service capability is assessed as basic-to-moderate.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier’s stated on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest delivery indicator in the provided dataset. This suggests reliable shipment execution within the platform-tracked performance scope.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score in this dimension.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 4
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided
Elaboration
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7, which suggests generally favorable buyer feedback. However, the review count is only 4, making the feedback sample too small for strong quality confidence. Verified supplier status provides some assurance regarding company legitimacy, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection or a detailed quality control system.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows positive but limited customer feedback. The low review volume and lack of confirmed product inspection information prevent a high score. Factory verification supports baseline credibility, but quality assurance depth remains insufficiently documented.
Final Score
14 / 20
Total Score
78 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended with controlled order sizing and additional verification. This supplier is suitable for buyers sourcing audio equipment such as amplifiers, speaker systems, and related electronic audio products, especially where low MOQ options and Trade Assurance are preferred. The main strengths are long platform history, verified supplier status, 100.0% on-time delivery, and moderate factory scale. Key risks include limited recent order volume, only 4 reviews, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and no confirmed Full Customization capability. Growth potential exists due to its established platform presence and stable delivery record, but larger procurement should require sample testing, quality inspection confirmation, and clearer customization or production capacity validation.
Leave your comment