Yunnan Grace New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yunnan Grace New Material Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Yunnan, with a reported factory area of over 43,000㎡ and more than 110 staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to have a meaningful physical production base and verified supplier status, positioning it as a potentially capable manufacturer for polyester-related yarn and raw material products. Its product listings indicate a focus on 100% polyester, high-tenacity polyester, DTY yarn, and related polyester materials, with flexible MOQ structures across different items.

From a platform credibility perspective, the supplier is an Gold Supplier with Trade Assurance support, but the Gold Supplier tenure is only 1 year. Commercial performance is still limited, with only 4 orders and CN¥6K+ transaction value in the past six months. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but it is based on only 1 review, which limits reliability. The main concern is delivery performance, with an on-time shipment rate of only 50.0%. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking early-stage sampling or controlled trial orders rather than high-risk bulk procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company: Yunnan Grace New Material Co., Ltd.
• Country: China
• Province: Yunnan
• Factory area: 43,000+㎡
• Employees: 110+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory verification indicator: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area of over 43,000㎡, which indicates a substantial physical manufacturing footprint. This is a positive sign for production capacity, warehousing potential, and operational scale. The staff size of 110+ employees suggests that the company is not a very small workshop-level supplier, but it is also not clearly positioned as a very large-scale industrial group based on the available employee data.

The presence of a verified supplier indicator strengthens the company profile, as it provides some level of platform-backed credibility regarding the existence or verification of the supplier. However, the provided data does not include detailed information about annual output, production lines, machinery quantity, daily/monthly capacity, export percentage, or factory audit reports. Therefore, while the factory area is strong, the production capability cannot be fully quantified.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates a meaningful factory scale with 43,000+㎡ and over 110 staff, which supports a stable mid-sized manufacturing profile. The verified supplier status further improves confidence in its operational legitimacy. However, the employee count is moderate rather than large, and there is insufficient data on actual production capacity, production equipment, or historical supply volume. Therefore, it should not be scored as a top-tier large-scale supply chain operator, but it is stronger than a small basic factory.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier tenure: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Warranty available
• Finished product inspection
• Minor customization
• ODM service available
• Verified supplier / factory verification indicator: True

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. It is listed as an Gold Supplier and supports Trade Assurance, which gives buyers some degree of transactional protection. The supplier also carries useful service and compliance-related tags, including warranty availability and finished product inspection. These are positive indicators for buyers evaluating basic transaction security and quality-control mechanisms.

However, the Gold Supplier tenure is only 1 year, which means the supplier has a relatively short verified operating history on the platform. The data does not include internationally recognized certifications, product compliance certificates, third-party audit reports, or detailed factory audit documentation. The available platform tags are helpful, but they are not sufficient to establish long-term platform credibility at the highest level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification status, and several useful platform tags. These factors support a reasonable level of platform trust. However, the short 1-year Gold Supplier history limits the strength of its credibility profile. The absence of detailed certification information also prevents a higher score. Overall, the supplier has a credible but still developing platform compliance profile.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 4
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥6K+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier’s commercial performance data is limited. A 5.0 store rating is positive, but it is based on only 1 review, which means the rating has low statistical reliability. The past six-month order volume of 4 orders and transaction amount of CN¥6K+ indicate that the supplier has completed transactions on the platform, but the scale is still relatively small.

For procurement evaluation, order volume and transaction value are important indicators of buyer acceptance and repeat commercial validation. In this case, the business record suggests that the supplier has some marketplace activity, but not enough to demonstrate strong demand, mature export handling, or high-volume buyer confidence. The low review count also makes it difficult to assess consistency across multiple customers.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has evidence of completed platform transactions and a perfect rating, which are positive. However, the order count and transaction value are both low, and the review base is extremely limited. Because the 5.0 rating is supported by only 1 review, it cannot be treated as strong proof of consistent customer satisfaction. The business performance should therefore be evaluated as early-stage or low-volume rather than commercially mature.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Response time: ≤2h
• Customization-related tags:
• Minor customization
• ODM service available
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. It is not at the strongest level of ≤1 hour, but it is still within a commercially reasonable range for initial inquiries and sourcing communication. The supplier also lists minor customization and ODM service availability, which suggests some ability to support product adjustment or development requests.

However, the provided data does not confirm full customization capability. Since the scoring standard specifically references Full Customization, this cannot be assumed. The supplier can be credited for minor customization and ODM service availability, but the absence of confirmed full customization limits the score.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows normal-to-good communication speed and has basic customization-related capabilities. A response time of ≤2 hours is acceptable for procurement communication, and ODM availability is a positive service feature. However, because Full Customization is not confirmed and only minor customization is explicitly listed, the supplier should be rated as having moderate rather than advanced service capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time shipment rate: 50.0%

Elaboration

Delivery reliability is a major concern for this supplier. The provided on-time shipment rate is only 50.0%, which means that only half of shipments were delivered on time according to the available platform data. This is significantly below the 70% threshold used in the scoring standard and indicates weak delivery consistency.

For procurement teams, especially those managing production schedules, inventory planning, or customer delivery commitments, this level of delivery performance creates operational risk. Late shipments can affect downstream production, retail launch schedules, or customer fulfillment timelines. Without additional data explaining the cause of the low on-time rate, this must be treated as a significant risk factor.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring requirement, an on-time shipment rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. At 50.0%, the supplier’s delivery performance is materially weak. Even if the supplier has factory scale and platform verification, poor delivery reliability directly reduces procurement suitability, particularly for bulk or time-sensitive orders.

Final Score

3 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1
• Finished product inspection: Available
• Verified supplier / factory verification indicator: True
• Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier has several positive quality-related indicators. Finished product inspection is listed, which suggests that some form of final inspection process is available before shipment. Warranty availability also adds a degree of after-sales assurance. The verified supplier status provides additional support for basic supplier credibility.

The main limitation is customer feedback depth. Although the store rating is 5.0, it is based on only 1 review. This makes it difficult to judge whether the supplier can maintain consistent quality across multiple orders, customers, and production batches. There is also no provided data on defect rates, inspection standards, quality certificates, third-party testing, or product compliance documentation. Therefore, the quality system appears to have basic support, but customer validation remains limited.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves credit for finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verification status. These are meaningful quality-support indicators. However, the extremely limited review count prevents the 5.0 rating from being treated as strong evidence of sustained customer satisfaction. The quality score is therefore placed in the lower part of the “good with basic quality controls” range rather than the top tier.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended, mainly for trial orders or low-risk procurement.

Yunnan Grace New Material Co., Ltd. shows a solid physical factory base, with 43,000+㎡ factory area, 110+ staff, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and finished product inspection availability. These factors make the supplier worth considering for buyers sourcing polyester yarn or polyester raw material products, especially when the buyer is willing to conduct controlled sampling, small-batch testing, or supplier development.

However, the supplier is not yet recommended for urgent, high-volume, or delivery-sensitive procurement without further validation. The main risk is the 50.0% on-time shipment rate, which is significantly weak. Business performance is also still limited, with only 4 orders and CN¥6K+ transaction value in the past six months, and the 5.0 rating is based on only 1 review.

Suitable customer types include buyers seeking sample evaluation, price benchmarking, early-stage supplier qualification, or small-to-medium trial orders. Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s factory scale and platform compliance foundation, but procurement teams should verify production capacity, delivery commitments, quality standards, and order management capability before placing larger orders.