zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangdong Aopei Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Guangdong Aopei Cosmetics Co., Ltd. is a China-based cosmetics supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 8,800+ m² and 80+ staff. The company shows a relatively stable manufacturing foundation for private label and OEM skincare-related products, supported by platform credibility including 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, and Full Customization. Its recent business performance is moderate, with 200+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the store rating of 4.2 and 70+ reviews suggest that customer feedback is acceptable but not yet strong enough to be considered premium-level. Service capability is supported by customization options, though the response time of ≤8 hours is not highly competitive. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for small to mid-sized buyers seeking low-MOQ OEM/private-label cosmetic products, while buyers with strict quality expectations should conduct additional sample testing and compliance review before bulk orders.

Guangdong Aopei Cosmetics Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Guangdong Aopei Cosmetics Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 8,800+ m²
  • Employees: 80+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory space of more than 8,800 square meters and more than 80 employees, which indicates a physical production base beyond a very small workshop scale. The company is not presented as a very large-scale manufacturer, but the available data suggests it has basic-to-medium production capacity. The “verified supplier” status adds credibility to its operational presence, although the data does not provide detailed production line numbers, monthly output, machinery list, R&D team size, or specific cosmetic manufacturing certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 8,800+ m² factory area and 80+ staff supports classification as a medium-sized supplier with stable basic production capability. The verified supplier status strengthens its credibility, but the absence of detailed capacity data and factory certification details limits the score from reaching the highest range. It is stronger than a small supplier with limited infrastructure, but the provided information is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale stable supply chain manufacturer.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • ODM service available
  • Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively strong platform profile. A 7-year Gold Supplier history indicates a longer presence on the platform compared with newer suppliers. Trade Assurance provides transactional protection for buyers using the platform. The supplier is also marked as verified, and its profile includes several useful commercial and operational labels, including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, and Full Customization.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates a complete and credible platform-backed profile. The 7-year Gold Supplier history is a meaningful positive factor, and the presence of Trade Assurance and verification improves buyer confidence. The certification and service labels are also relatively complete. However, the data does not include independent cosmetic-specific certifications, such as GMP, ISO, FDA, or other regulatory documentation. Since such information is not provided, it must be treated as Insufficient Data and cannot be credited in the score.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 200+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
  • Store rating: 4.2
  • Reviews: 70+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved over 200 orders in the past six months, showing active commercial traction on the platform. The reported transaction value of CN¥202.8K+ indicates measurable but moderate sales volume. The store rating of 4.2 is acceptable, but not outstanding. The review count of 70+ provides some customer feedback base, though it is not large enough to represent very broad market validation.

Scoring Rationale

The order volume is a positive indicator, especially for buyers looking for an active supplier with ongoing transactions. However, the transaction value is moderate rather than high, and the 4.2 rating suggests room for improvement in customer satisfaction or consistency. The number of reviews supports basic commercial validation but does not reflect a highly mature or strongly proven seller profile. Therefore, the supplier fits the “stable medium-scale transaction” category rather than the top-performance tier.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response time: ≤8 hours
  • Full Customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier supports Full Customization and ODM services, which is important for private label and OEM cosmetic buyers. This suggests the supplier can accommodate customized product or branding requirements within the scope reflected by its platform labels. However, the reported response time is ≤8 hours, which is acceptable but not highly responsive compared with suppliers responding within one hour.

Scoring Rationale

The availability of Full Customization and ODM services gives the supplier a solid service foundation for customized skincare products. However, communication responsiveness is not at the highest level based on the provided ≤8-hour response time. Since fast communication is important in OEM/private-label development, particularly for samples, packaging, formulation adjustments, and order confirmation, the service score should remain in the normal-to-good range rather than the excellent range.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 94.4%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time dispatch rate is 94.4%, which is above the 90% benchmark. This indicates relatively reliable delivery execution based on platform data. For buyers managing inventory schedules or promotional launches, this is a positive operational indicator.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% falls within the 9–10 point range. The supplier’s 94.4% rate is clearly within this band. However, since it is not close to a perfect dispatch record and no additional data is provided regarding average lead time, production cycle, or delay handling, a strong but not maximum score is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.2
  • Reviews: 70+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
  • Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability. The verified supplier status also supports a basic level of operational credibility. Customer feedback is present, with 70+ reviews, but the store rating of 4.2 is moderate rather than excellent. This suggests that while the supplier has received customer validation, quality consistency or service experience may not be at a top-tier level.

Scoring Rationale

The presence of Finished Product Inspection is a meaningful quality control advantage, especially for finished cosmetic products. The verified supplier status also improves confidence in the supplier’s operational legitimacy. However, the customer rating of 4.2 prevents the supplier from being scored as a high-feedback, premium-quality supplier. The number of reviews is sufficient for basic assessment but not large enough to represent extensive buyer validation. Additional cosmetic-specific quality certifications are not provided, so this area remains Insufficient Data.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 15 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Guangdong Aopei Cosmetics Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ private label or OEM skincare products, especially small to mid-sized brands, trial-order buyers, e-commerce sellers, and buyers requiring customization flexibility. Its strengths include 7 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service availability, and a strong 94.4% on-time dispatch rate.

Key risks include the moderate store rating of 4.2, limited review base of 70+, and lack of provided data on cosmetic-specific certifications, detailed production capacity, laboratory capability, formulation compliance, or export market regulatory readiness. These areas should be treated as Insufficient Data.

For procurement, sample testing, packaging review, ingredient documentation checks, and pre-shipment inspection are recommended before placing bulk orders. The supplier shows growth potential as a flexible OEM/private-label cosmetics partner, but quality verification should be strengthened before long-term sourcing commitment.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Yiwu Shiwei Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Shiwei Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yichuang Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yichuang Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Biying Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Biying Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Potentech (Guangdong) Limited Supplier Evaluation
Potentech (Guangdong) Limited Supplier Evaluation
Frascio (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Frascio (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Mondax (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Mondax (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Liangjian Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Liangjian Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kepu Kejea Co. , Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kepu Kejea Co. , Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jushu Food Co.. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jushu Food Co.. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiahao Marketing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiahao Marketing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sunkings Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sunkings Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kivon Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kivon Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiajianle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiajianle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kinocean Yacht Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kinocean Yacht Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhifang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhifang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Gongtu New Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Gongtu New Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Winking Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Winking Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Bestway Plastic And Metal Products Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bestway Plastic And Metal Products Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Heyang Electrical Appliances Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Heyang Electrical Appliances Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Qiandao Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Qiandao Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Efu Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Efu Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Cairun Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Cairun Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Ginier Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Ginier Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Innovate Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Innovate Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Yitong Filter Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Yitong Filter Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Jiayue Sanitary Products Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Jiayue Sanitary Products Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Xingye Shengda Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Xingye Shengda Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Youzhu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Youzhu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Shuxin Wire Mesh Manufactory Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Shuxin Wire Mesh Manufactory Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zigong Zhaoqiang Sealing Products Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zigong Zhaoqiang Sealing Products Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Tengjing Electromechanical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Tengjing Electromechanical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingzhou Jimei Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingzhou Jimei Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xyyp Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xyyp Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Further Technology (Dongguan) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Further Technology (Dongguan) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shouguang Clean Water Tank Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shouguang Clean Water Tank Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Tenghui Boiler Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Tenghui Boiler Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026