zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Hunan Youzhu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Hunan Youzhu Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Hunan, offering hookah/shisha charcoal products made from natural bamboo and coconut materials. The supplier shows a moderate production foundation, supported by a reported factory area of 17,000+ sqm, 50+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is supported by Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and factory/supplier verification indicators, although the Gold Supplier tenure is only 1 year. Commercial traction remains limited, with only 2 orders and CN¥33.8K+ transaction value in the past six months, plus just 1 customer review despite a 5.0 store rating. Service capability is acceptable with response time within 4 hours and customization support. The key concern is delivery performance, as the reported on-time delivery rate is 0.0%. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking small trial orders or customized hookah charcoal sourcing, but delivery reliability requires careful verification before scaling procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
The supplier reports a factory area of 17,000+ sqm, 50+ staff, and verified supplier status. The company is located in Hunan, China. Product listings focus on premium hookah/shisha charcoal using bamboo and coconut materials.

Elaboration:
The factory area indicates a relatively established physical production base, while the staff count of 50+ suggests a small-to-medium operational scale rather than a large industrial manufacturer. Verified supplier status provides some support for the existence and credibility of the company’s operational setup. However, the available data does not include detailed production capacity, monthly output, machinery list, export volume, or factory audit details beyond the verified supplier indicator.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has stronger-than-basic infrastructure due to the 17,000+ sqm factory area and verification status, but the employee count remains modest and there is insufficient data on actual production throughput. This places the company above a small basic supplier but below a large-scale, fully proven supply chain partner.

Final Score: 15/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
The supplier is listed as an Gold Supplier for 1 year, supports Trade Assurance, and has certification/industry tags including Finished Product Inspection, Response time ≤4h, On-time delivery 0.0%, and Full Customization. Verified supplier status is also provided.

Elaboration:
Trade Assurance and verified supplier status improve platform-level credibility and reduce basic transaction risk. Finished Product Inspection is a positive compliance-related indicator for quality control. However, Gold Supplier history is short at only 1 year, so long-term platform reliability is not yet strongly demonstrated. The certification/tag set is useful but not equivalent to broader factory certifications such as ISO or product-specific compliance certificates; such certifications are not provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale:
Core platform safeguards are present, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and inspection-related tags. The short Gold Supplier tenure and absence of additional documented compliance certifications limit the score from reaching the highest credibility tier.

Final Score: 15/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
Past six months order volume is 2 orders, transaction amount is CN¥33.8K+, store rating is 5.0, and review count is 1.

Elaboration:
The 5.0 store rating is positive, but it is based on only 1 review, which limits its statistical reliability. The supplier has generated some transaction value, but the order count of 2 in the past six months indicates limited commercial validation on the platform. The data does not show repeat buyers, export destinations, major customers, or long-term purchase history.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates some business activity and a positive rating, but the low order count and very limited review base prevent strong confidence in sustained market acceptance. Commercial performance is therefore considered low-to-moderate rather than stable or high-volume.

Final Score: 11/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
Communication response time is ≤4h, and the platform tags include Full Customization.

Elaboration:
A response time within 4 hours is acceptable for international sourcing communication, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour. Full Customization indicates the supplier can support customized requirements, which is valuable for buyers needing private label, packaging, sizing, or product adaptation; however, the data does not specify the exact customization scope.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has clear service advantages through customization support and reasonably fast response. Since the response time is not ≤1h and customization details are not fully specified, the score is placed in the normal-to-good service capability range rather than the top tier.

Final Score: 8/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
Reported on-time delivery rate is 0.0%.

Elaboration:
Delivery reliability is a major procurement concern. A 0.0% on-time delivery rate indicates either no successfully measured on-time shipments or poor delivery execution in the available platform data. The dataset does not clarify whether this figure is due to limited transaction volume, data absence, or actual delayed shipments, so the safest assessment is to treat delivery performance as weak based on the provided number.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. Since the reported rate is 0.0%, this is the supplier’s weakest dimension and creates a material risk for buyers with strict shipment schedules.

Final Score: 2/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
Store rating is 5.0, review count is 1, Finished Product Inspection is listed, and verified supplier status is provided.

Elaboration:
The 5.0 rating is positive but based on a very small review sample, so it cannot fully validate consistent product quality. Finished Product Inspection is a meaningful quality assurance indicator and suggests that finished goods inspection is available. Verified supplier status also supports basic supplier legitimacy. However, the data does not include defect rates, inspection reports, third-party test certificates, product compliance documents, or detailed customer feedback content.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has basic quality assurance signals through Finished Product Inspection and verification, and the available rating is favorable. However, the extremely limited review count means customer feedback is not yet strong enough to confirm stable quality performance across multiple orders.

Final Score: 14/20

Total Score

Company Strength: 15/20
Platform & Compliance Credibility: 15/20
Business Performance: 11/20
Service Capability: 8/10
Delivery Performance: 2/10
Quality & Customer Feedback: 14/20

Total Score: 65/100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for trial-stage sourcing, small-volume orders, or buyers seeking customized hookah/shisha charcoal products with low initial MOQ flexibility. The supplier shows a reasonable production base, platform safeguards, customization capability, and basic quality assurance through Finished Product Inspection.

However, it is not yet recommended for urgent, large-scale, or schedule-critical procurement without further verification. The main risks are the 0.0% on-time delivery rate, limited six-month order volume, short 1-year Gold Supplier history, and only 1 customer review. Buyers should start with sample orders or small pilot orders, confirm production lead time in writing, use Trade Assurance, and request inspection documentation before scaling. Growth potential exists if the supplier can improve delivery performance and accumulate more verified transaction history.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Hunan Langle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Langle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Yasin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Yasin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xinghuang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xinghuang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Province Rainbow Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Province Rainbow Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Dingli Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Dingli Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kangquan Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kangquan Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Weiyan Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Weiyan Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jinlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jinlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xinjiyuan New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xinjiyuan New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan New Frontier Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan New Frontier Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kangningda Medical Science&Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Kangningda Medical Science&Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Dinghan Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Dinghan Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Tianhong Traditional Chinese Medicine Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Tianhong Traditional Chinese Medicine Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Toma Energy Saving Science And Technology Corp.Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Toma Energy Saving Science And Technology Corp.Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Mt Health Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Mt Health Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jqmaterial Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jqmaterial Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Qianjing Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Qianjing Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Qianzi Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Qianzi Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jiaobao New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jiaobao New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Chongqing Jiaxinqi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Jiaxinqi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Winnerjet Printer Consumables Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Winnerjet Printer Consumables Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinbaota (Henan) Safe Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinbaota (Henan) Safe Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Europe Mango New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Europe Mango New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuhuan Shuangqi Home Furnishing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuhuan Shuangqi Home Furnishing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Bohang International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Bohang International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Delle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Delle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Xingke Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Xingke Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meifei Building Materials (Hebei) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meifei Building Materials (Hebei) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Toma Energy Saving Science And Technology Corp.Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Toma Energy Saving Science And Technology Corp.Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Alpicool Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Alpicool Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Deyi Diamond Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Deyi Diamond Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changyi Baiyi Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changyi Baiyi Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Rui Mei Das Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Rui Mei Das Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Xintao Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Xintao Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Galaxyfiber Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Galaxyfiber Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongcheng Jinlong Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tongcheng Jinlong Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Mingtuo Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Mingtuo Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026