zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering UPS-related products including mini DC UPS units, WiFi backup UPS products, offline UPS power supplies, and 650VA to 1250VA backup UPS models. Based on the provided data, the company operates from a 2,600+㎡ facility with 80+ staff and is listed as a verified supplier, indicating a basic-to-moderate production foundation rather than a large-scale manufacturing base. Its profile shows 4 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and platform tags including 98.2% on-time delivery and response time within 2 hours. Commercial performance appears stable, with 100+ orders and CN¥2.1M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 50+ reviews. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium batch UPS procurement with platform-backed transaction protection and relatively reliable delivery performance.

Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 2,600+㎡
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory province: Guangdong, China

Elaboration:
The supplier has a clearly stated physical operating base and workforce size. A 2,600+㎡ facility with 80+ staff suggests it has an established production or operating structure, but the scale is not large enough to be classified as a large-scale supply chain manufacturer based on the provided information. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s operational existence and basic manufacturing capability.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates more than minimal production capacity, supported by a defined factory area, employee count, and supplier verification. However, the available data does not show large-scale factory size, extensive workforce, multiple facilities, advanced production lines, or specific factory certifications. Therefore, it fits best within the medium-to-small stable supplier range rather than the top-tier large-scale category.

Final Score: 15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Platform tags: “On-time delivery 98.2%”, “Response time ≤2h”

Elaboration:
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. A 4-year Gold Supplier history provides a reasonable track record on the platform, while Trade Assurance improves transaction protection for buyers. The listed platform tags also provide measurable operational indicators related to delivery and communication.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a reliable supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. The 4-year duration is positive but not long enough to be considered exceptionally established. Certification or industry label information beyond delivery and response tags is limited, so the score is strong but not at the maximum level.

Final Score: 17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Past 6-month orders: 100+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥2.1M+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 50+

Elaboration:
The supplier has visible transaction activity over the last six months, with more than 100 orders and transaction value exceeding CN¥2.1M. This indicates active commercial engagement and a certain level of market acceptance on the platform. The 4.7 rating is favorable, while 50+ reviews provide some customer feedback base, though not a very large review pool.

Scoring Rationale:
The business data supports a stable mid-level trading profile. Order volume and transaction value are meaningful, and the store rating is positive. However, the available figures do not indicate exceptionally high-volume trading or a very large number of reviews. The supplier therefore ranks above basic commercial validation but below the highest-performance category.

Final Score: 16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time within 2 hours indicates reasonably efficient communication. This is beneficial for procurement discussions, quotation follow-up, and order coordination. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, private labeling, design modification, or engineering-based customization.

Scoring Rationale:
The response speed is acceptable and supports normal procurement communication. However, the lack of confirmed Full Customization data prevents the supplier from reaching the top service capability range. Since customization capability is a required factor in this dimension and is not provided, the score remains in the moderate range.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 98.2%

Elaboration:
A 98.2% on-time delivery rate is a strong operational indicator. For procurement buyers, this suggests the supplier has demonstrated reliable shipment execution on the platform. This is especially relevant for UPS products where buyers may require predictable replenishment cycles or scheduled delivery commitments.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier exceeds the 90% benchmark for the highest delivery performance range. Since the provided on-time delivery rate is 98.2%, it qualifies for a top-tier score in this category. No negative delivery data was provided.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 50+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Supplier verification provided; specific factory verification details are Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The 4.7 rating indicates generally positive customer feedback, and 50+ reviews provide a moderate reference base. Supplier verification strengthens credibility, but the data does not clearly confirm Finished Product Inspection or detailed factory verification procedures. As a result, the supplier shows positive quality signals, but the documented quality assurance system is not fully transparent from the provided data.

Scoring Rationale:
The rating is good and the review count is sufficient for basic customer feedback assessment, but not large enough to represent extensive market validation. The absence of explicit Finished Product Inspection information limits confidence in formal quality control processes. Therefore, the supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance indicators” range rather than the highest quality assurance category.

Final Score: 16 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 81 / 100

  • Company Strength: 15 / 20
  • Platform & Compliance Credibility: 17 / 20
  • Business Performance: 16 / 20
  • Service Capability: 7 / 10
  • Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
  • Quality & Customer Feedback: 16 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume UPS procurement with platform protection, moderate supplier scale, and strong delivery reliability. The supplier is most suitable for importers, distributors, online sellers, and project buyers requiring mini UPS or offline UPS products with relatively low MOQs.

Key risks include limited evidence of advanced factory scale, insufficient data on Full Customization, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and incomplete details on formal factory-level quality systems. Growth potential is positive due to stable recent transaction performance, 4-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and a strong 98.2% on-time delivery rate. Overall, Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. appears to be a commercially active and platform-credible supplier, best approached with sample orders, specification confirmation, and quality inspection requirements before larger procurement commitments.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiajianle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiajianle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhifang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhifang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhongyan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhongyan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yufan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yufan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shanan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shanan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Fuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Fuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Eraclean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Eraclean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Empress Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Empress Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Dp Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Dp Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Invitop Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Invitop Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sohoo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sohoo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Henglicai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Henglicai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yidu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yidu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wochuan Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wochuan Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Kong Seng Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kong Seng Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Tianluping Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Tianluping Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Hi-Tech Zone Embody Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Hi-Tech Zone Embody Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Haoyu Security Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Haoyu Security Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kende Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kende Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Tonze Electric Appliance Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Tonze Electric Appliance Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enping Xiehe Audio Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Enping Xiehe Audio Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Colorfly Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Colorfly Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Truly Instrument Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Truly Instrument Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Zhihong Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Zhihong Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yaoling Biotechnology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yaoling Biotechnology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Granbo Technology Industrial Shenzhen Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Granbo Technology Industrial Shenzhen Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Jaguar Sign Express Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Jaguar Sign Express Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Snat Energy Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Snat Energy Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gaoyang Shupeng Textile Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gaoyang Shupeng Textile Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chang Zhou Ncyclebike Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chang Zhou Ncyclebike Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Youhang Rattan Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Youhang Rattan Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Xujie Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Xujie Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Hym Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Hym Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aoqun New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aoqun New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026