zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangdong Zhongyan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Guangdong Zhongyan Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering smart IC/ID card reader modules, NFC/contactless readers, waterproof readers, dual-frequency readers, and TCP network reader products. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale but operationally validated supplier, with a factory area of 1,000+㎡, 20+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform profile shows relatively solid credibility, including 6 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and a 100.0% on-time delivery indicator. Commercial performance is moderate to strong, with 100+ orders and CN¥946.5K+ transaction value over the past six months, although the review count remains limited at 10+. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ sourcing, sample purchases, or small-to-medium batch procurement of RFID/NFC reader-related products. Key limitations include limited workforce scale, unclear customization capability, and insufficient data on finished product inspection systems.

Guangdong Zhongyan Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Guangdong Zhongyan Technology Co., Ltd.
  • Country/Region: China, Guangdong
  • Factory area: 1,000+㎡
  • Employees: 20+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a declared factory area of over 1,000 square meters and more than 20 employees. This indicates that the company has a physical production or operational base, but the scale is relatively limited compared with larger industrial manufacturers. The verified supplier status provides some level of operational credibility, suggesting that the company has undergone a supplier verification process. However, the provided data does not include additional factory certifications, production line quantity, monthly output, machinery details, R&D team size, or quality lab information.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic production capability and verified supplier status, which supports its suitability for regular sourcing and small-to-medium volume procurement. However, the factory size and employee count indicate a relatively small operation rather than a large-scale manufacturing base. Because there is no data confirming large production capacity, advanced factory certification, or extensive workforce scale, the score should remain within the “small but with basic production capability” range.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification/industry labels: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 6 years, which indicates a relatively established platform presence. Trade Assurance support is also a positive factor, as it provides buyers with an additional transaction protection mechanism. The supplier is marked as verified, and platform labels show response time and delivery performance indicators. However, the provided certification/industry label list does not include detailed factory audit certificates, product compliance certifications, ISO certifications, or industry-specific compliance documentation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators: Gold Supplier membership, 6-year platform history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These factors make the supplier more credible than a newly listed or unverified vendor. However, the compliance profile is not fully complete because there is insufficient data on formal factory certifications, product certifications, or third-party audit details. Therefore, the supplier fits the upper-middle credibility range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥946.5K+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Number of reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 100 orders and over CN¥946.5K in transaction value over the past six months. This indicates active commercial performance and a meaningful level of market validation on the platform. The store rating of 4.7 is positive, suggesting generally favorable buyer satisfaction. However, the review count is only 10+, which limits the strength of customer feedback evidence. A higher review volume would provide stronger confidence in consistency across multiple buyers and transaction scenarios.

Scoring Rationale

The order quantity and transaction amount show that the supplier is not inactive and has already completed a reasonable volume of business. The rating is also favorable at 4.7. However, the relatively small number of reviews weakens the depth of buyer-side validation. The supplier demonstrates stable commercial traction, but not enough evidence is provided to classify it as a top-performing high-volume supplier.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Platform label: “Response time ≤2h”
  • Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as within two hours, which indicates a relatively responsive communication standard. This is beneficial for quotation requests, sample discussions, order confirmation, and after-sales coordination. However, the provided data does not state whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, firmware customization, hardware design changes, or packaging customization.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤2h is a positive service indicator, although it does not reach the strongest level of ≤1h specified in the scoring framework. Since there is no available data confirming Full Customization or advanced customization capability, the supplier cannot receive a high-end service score. The service capability appears reliable for standard inquiries and basic order communication, but customization depth remains unverified.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is listed at 100.0%, which is the strongest delivery indicator provided in the dataset. This suggests that, based on platform-recorded performance, the supplier has demonstrated reliable shipment execution. Strong delivery performance is especially important for buyers managing project timelines, reseller inventory, or recurring procurement schedules.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier reaches the highest delivery performance band. No negative delivery indicators are included in the provided data.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Number of reviews: 10+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.7 store rating, which is a positive customer satisfaction indicator. The review count of 10+ provides some customer feedback reference, but it is still limited in volume. Verified supplier status adds a degree of credibility, but the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier has a Finished Product Inspection process, documented QC procedures, third-party inspection records, or formal quality management certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows acceptable quality-related indicators through its 4.7 rating and verified supplier status. However, the low review count limits the reliability of customer feedback as a broad quality benchmark. In addition, the absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection or detailed factory verification information prevents the supplier from being rated in the highest quality assurance category. The quality profile is positive but not fully substantiated.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 17 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 14 / 20
Total Score 76 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Guangdong Zhongyan Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking standard RFID/NFC/contactless reader products with low MOQ flexibility, sample procurement, and small-to-medium order volumes. The supplier has a solid platform profile, including 6 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 100+ recent orders, CN¥946.5K+ recent transaction value, and 100.0% on-time delivery.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers needing low-MOQ or sample-based sourcing
- Small-to-medium distributors or project buyers
- Procurement teams seeking standard card reader and NFC reader products
- Buyers prioritizing platform-backed transactions and delivery reliability

Main risks:
- Small factory scale with only 1,000+㎡ and 20+ staff
- Insufficient data on Full Customization capability
- Insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection and formal quality systems
- Limited review base of 10+, despite a positive 4.7 rating

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good platform maturity and recent transaction activity. If it can provide clearer evidence of quality control processes, inspection capability, production capacity, and customization support, it may become more suitable for larger-volume or more technically demanding procurement projects.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiajianle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiajianle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhifang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhifang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yufan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yufan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shanan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shanan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Fuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Fuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Eraclean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Eraclean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Empress Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Empress Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Dp Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Dp Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Invitop Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Invitop Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sohoo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sohoo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Henglicai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Henglicai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yidu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yidu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Liuye Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Liuye Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Dongguan Yichuang Hat And Bag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yichuang Hat And Bag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Jinglan Nonwoven Fabric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Jinglan Nonwoven Fabric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Morida Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Morida Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Frechem Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Frechem Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Famebest Industrial Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Famebest Industrial Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Youmu Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Youmu Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jarmoo Flag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Jarmoo Flag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Zotion Dentistry Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Zotion Dentistry Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Zhenxin Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Zhenxin Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Great-Ears Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Great-Ears Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minghang Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minghang Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ounan Industrial And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ounan Industrial And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liuzhou Nuoanke Seal Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liuzhou Nuoanke Seal Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Poweryear Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Poweryear Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Oscar Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Oscar Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Xingyuan Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Xingyuan Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Dena Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Dena Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou Xiuhe Necktie & Weaving Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou Xiuhe Necktie & Weaving Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026