zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Liuye Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Liuye Technology Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based supplier focused on scooter tire-related products, with listed items including 10-inch scooter tyres, vacuum tires, solid tires, and inflated spare outer tyres. Based on the provided data, the company has a factory area of 3,700+㎡, 40+ staff, and is marked as a verified supplier, indicating a small-to-mid-sized production setup with basic operational credibility. Its platform profile is comparatively strong, supported by 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and ODM service availability. Commercial performance is also visible, with 400+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.4 store rating and 100+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ scooter tire sourcing, moderate-volume procurement, and customization-capable supply. Key caution areas include limited workforce scale and a store rating that is good but not top-tier.

Shenzhen Liuye Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Shenzhen Liuye Technology Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 3,700+㎡
  • Employees: 40+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier operates with a factory area exceeding 3,700㎡ and a workforce of over 40 employees. This indicates that the company has a physical production or operational base of measurable scale, but the available data does not suggest a very large manufacturing organization. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence that the company has undergone some level of supplier verification, although the data does not specify the exact verification body, audit scope, production lines, monthly capacity, equipment list, or factory certification details.

The scale is more consistent with a small-to-medium supplier rather than a large industrial manufacturer. The company appears capable of supporting routine procurement needs, especially for scooter tire-related products, but there is insufficient data to confirm large-scale mass production capacity or advanced manufacturing infrastructure.

Scoring Rationale

A 3,700+㎡ facility and 40+ staff demonstrate a tangible operating base and basic production capability. The verified supplier status adds credibility, but the company does not reach the “large-scale stable supply chain” level because the employee count and factory area are moderate, and there is no provided data on production capacity, automation level, major factory certifications, or large-scale manufacturing infrastructure. Therefore, the supplier fits best within the “medium or small-to-mid stable factory” range.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / platform labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • Full customization
  • ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively strong platform credibility profile. A 7-year Gold Supplier history suggests sustained platform presence rather than a newly established online storefront. Trade Assurance availability provides transaction protection mechanisms for buyers using the platform. The verified supplier status further enhances trust, although the provided information does not disclose the verification depth or audit report details.

The platform labels are also commercially valuable. Finished Product Inspection indicates that some product inspection process is available. Full Customization and ODM service availability suggest the supplier can support non-standard or buyer-specific requirements. Warranty availability also improves post-sale confidence, though the specific warranty duration, coverage, and claim process are not provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates a strong combination of platform trust signals: 7 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple useful platform service labels. This is a well-rounded platform compliance profile. The score is not a full 20 because the data does not include detailed third-party factory audit reports, internationally recognized management system certifications, or specific compliance certificates. However, within the provided -based credibility indicators, the supplier performs strongly.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 400+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
  • Store rating: 4.4
  • Reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier shows active commercial traction on the platform. More than 400 orders in the past six months indicates consistent buyer activity and product movement. A transaction value above CN¥540.9K demonstrates meaningful commercial turnover, though the average transaction size appears moderate based on the provided order and transaction value figures.

The store rating of 4.4 is generally positive but not exceptional. The review count of 100+ gives the rating a reasonable level of reference value, as it is not based on only a very small number of buyers. This combination suggests that the supplier has been commercially tested by multiple customers, but the rating leaves some room for improvement in customer satisfaction, consistency, or service quality.

Scoring Rationale

The company has clear business validation through 400+ recent orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value, which supports confidence in ongoing market activity. The 100+ reviews provide additional evidence of transaction history. However, the 4.4 rating is below the highest-performance range typically expected for top-tier suppliers, and the transaction value, while solid, does not indicate a very large-scale business volume. Therefore, the supplier is best assessed as having stable mid-to-strong business performance rather than top-tier commercial dominance.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within two hours is commercially acceptable and indicates a reasonably responsive sales or customer service process. While it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour, it is still suitable for normal procurement communication.

The availability of Full Customization and ODM service is a positive service capability indicator. It suggests that the supplier can potentially support customized product requirements or buyer-specific development needs. However, the provided data does not include details such as customization scope, sample lead time, engineering support, mold development capability, or minimum order requirements for customized projects.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good service capability through a response time of ≤2h and customization-related service labels. This supports buyers who require product adaptation rather than only standard item purchasing. The score is not placed in the 9–10 range because the stated response time is not ≤1h, and there is insufficient data on the depth and execution quality of customization services. Overall, the service level is solid and procurement-friendly.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 92.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate of 92.9% is above the 90% benchmark. This indicates a strong delivery performance based on the provided platform metric. For procurement teams, this is a positive operational indicator because it suggests that the supplier generally meets dispatch timelines.

However, the data only covers the on-time dispatch rate and does not include average lead time, production lead time, logistics method, late shipment reasons, order complexity, or seasonal delivery variation. Therefore, the assessment is limited to the stated dispatch performance metric.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. At 92.9%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery reliability. The score is set at 9 rather than 10 because the rate is strong but not near-perfect, and there is insufficient data on broader delivery stability, lead-time accuracy, or performance under larger orders.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.4
  • Reviews: 100+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.4 store rating supported by more than 100 reviews. This provides a meaningful customer feedback base and indicates that buyers have completed transactions and provided evaluations. The rating is generally favorable but not at a premium level, suggesting that customer satisfaction is acceptable but may not be consistently excellent.

Finished Product Inspection is an important quality assurance indicator, as it suggests that final goods can be inspected before shipment. Verified supplier status and warranty availability further support the supplier’s quality credibility. However, the data does not include defect rates, inspection standards, product test reports, warranty claim history, customer complaint details, or third-party quality certifications. Therefore, the quality assessment must remain limited to the platform indicators provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several positive quality-related indicators: Finished Product Inspection, verified supplier status, warranty availability, 100+ reviews, and a 4.4 rating. This supports a good quality confidence level for standard procurement. However, the 4.4 score is not high enough to justify a top-tier rating, and there is insufficient data on formal quality systems, product certifications, or detailed inspection outcomes. The supplier therefore fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance” range.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 17 / 20
Total Score 85 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Shenzhen Liuye Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking scooter tire-related products with low minimum order quantities, visible platform transaction history, Trade Assurance support, and customization/ODM service availability. The supplier appears especially appropriate for small-to-medium procurement projects, trial orders, aftermarket parts sourcing, and buyers who value platform-backed transaction protection.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers sourcing scooter tires or related spare tire products
- Small and medium distributors requiring low MOQ purchasing
- E-commerce sellers or repair-parts suppliers needing flexible order quantities
- Buyers requiring basic customization or ODM support, subject to further confirmation

Main risk points:
- Factory scale is moderate, with 3,700+㎡ and 40+ staff; large-volume capacity is not fully evidenced.
- Store rating is 4.4, which is positive but not top-tier.
- Insufficient Data on production capacity, product certifications, defect rate, detailed factory audit scope, and formal quality management systems.
- Customization capability is indicated, but customization depth, lead time, and engineering resources are not specified.

Growth potential:
The supplier has strong platform credibility, 7 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, 400+ recent orders, and a 92.9% on-time dispatch rate. If the company can provide more detailed quality documentation, production capacity data, and stronger customer satisfaction performance, it has potential to become a more reliable long-term sourcing partner for scooter tire procurement.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Leaders Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Leaders Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Changshu Lifeng Linen&Cotton Weaving Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changshu Lifeng Linen&Cotton Weaving Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Shengmiao International Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Shengmiao International Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Wentao Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Wentao Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Xinrou Aviation Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Xinrou Aviation Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Topdive Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Topdive Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Benming New Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Benming New Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou 246 Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou 246 Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Acce Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Acce Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meilan Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meilan Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Xingou Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Xingou Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Keju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Keju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Optfocus Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Optfocus Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Monton Bearing Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Monton Bearing Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou City Zhidao Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou City Zhidao Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Gongli New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Gongli New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou J&H Storefixture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou J&H Storefixture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Youlong Electrical Industry (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Youlong Electrical Industry (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Dingxi Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Dingxi Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cmec Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cmec Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Koodle Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Koodle Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026