Youlong Electrical Industry (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Youlong Electrical Industry (shenzhen) Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based supplier with a reported factory area of 17,000+ m² and 540+ staff, indicating a relatively solid manufacturing base. The supplier is listed as a verified supplier and has 21 years as an Gold Supplier, which provides strong platform credibility. Its listed products include smart/home/industrial dehumidifiers and one UV swimming pool-related product, with MOQs ranging from 2 pieces/units to over 500 units. However, key commercial performance indicators are missing: past six-month order volume, transaction value, shop rating, and customer review count are either blank or zero. Trade Assurance is not supported, and no Finished Product Inspection data is provided. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers prioritizing factory scale, long platform history, and delivery reliability, but procurement should proceed with caution due to limited transaction transparency and insufficient customer feedback data.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis:
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 17,000+ m²
- Employees: 540+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration:
The supplier shows a substantial physical operating base, with both factory area and employee count suggesting established production capacity. A workforce of over 540 staff and a factory size above 17,000 m² indicate the company is not a small workshop-level supplier. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of a formal operating entity and factory background.
Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates strong manufacturing fundamentals through factory scale, employee base, and supplier verification. While the data supports a stable production profile, there is no additional information on production lines, annual capacity, equipment, or factory audit details, so the score should not reach the maximum range.
Final Score: 18 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 21 years
- Trade Assurance: False
- Certification / industry labels: “Response time ≤13h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration:
A 21-year Gold Supplier history is a strong platform credibility signal, especially when combined with verified supplier status. The supplier also has platform-visible performance labels related to response time and delivery. However, Trade Assurance is not supported, and no additional certification, product compliance, or third-party audit documents are provided in the supplied data.
Scoring Rationale:
The long Gold Supplier tenure and verification status provide strong credibility, but the absence of Trade Assurance reduces buyer protection. Certification-label completeness is also limited because the available labels relate mainly to response and delivery performance rather than formal compliance or product certification.
Final Score: 17 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis:
- Past six-month order volume: Insufficient Data
- Past six-month transaction amount: Insufficient Data
- Shop rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
Elaboration:
The supplier’s commercial performance cannot be fully validated from the provided data. There are no disclosed recent order quantities, no transaction amount, no shop rating, and the review count is zero. This limits the ability to assess market acceptance, repeat purchasing behavior, or buyer satisfaction through platform transaction evidence.
Scoring Rationale:
Despite strong company and platform background, commercial validation is weak because recent sales data and customer rating indicators are missing. A zero review count creates additional uncertainty around buyer feedback and transaction consistency.
Final Score: 6 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤13h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration:
The supplier has a stated response time of no more than 13 hours, which indicates basic responsiveness but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. No information is provided regarding Full Customization, design support, OEM/ODM capability, or dedicated account service.
Scoring Rationale:
The response time is acceptable for standard inquiry handling, but it is not fast enough to qualify as high service performance. Since customization capability is not provided, the service score remains moderate rather than strong.
Final Score: 6 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest available delivery indicator in the provided data. This suggests reliable order dispatch performance within the platform’s available measurement framework.
Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension.
Final Score: 10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis:
- Shop rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification / verified supplier: True
Elaboration:
Quality assurance visibility is limited. The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some basic confidence in factory legitimacy, but there is no shop rating, no customer review base, and no data confirming Finished Product Inspection. Without customer feedback or inspection information, product consistency and buyer satisfaction cannot be strongly validated.
Scoring Rationale:
The verified supplier status supports baseline credibility, but the absence of reviews, shop rating, and Finished Product Inspection data creates a significant quality-verification gap. The supplier therefore scores below the average range for quality and feedback.
Final Score: 8 / 20
Total Score
65 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is conditionally recommended. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking a China-based factory with measurable scale, long presence, and strong reported delivery performance. It is more appropriate for buyers who can conduct sample testing, factory due diligence, and pre-shipment inspection before placing larger orders.
Key risks include insufficient recent transaction data, no disclosed order value, zero reviews, missing shop rating, no Trade Assurance support, and insufficient quality inspection information. Growth potential exists due to its factory scale, 21-year Gold Supplier history, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate, but procurement should start with low-risk trial orders and require clear quality, inspection, and payment safeguards.
Leave your comment