Luoyang Boying Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Luoyang Boying Bearing Co., Ltd. is a China-based bearing supplier located in Henan, with a reported factory area of 13,000+㎡ and 180+ staff. The company appears to have a moderate manufacturing base and is listed as a verified supplier, supported by Gold Supplier status for 2 years and Trade Assurance. Its listed products are mainly cross roller bearings, cylindrical roller bearings, and CNC machine bearing-related products, with low MOQs of 5 pieces, which may suit small-batch procurement, sample testing, and specialized industrial bearing buyers. However, its commercial performance data is still limited, with only 7 orders and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value over the past six months. Customer feedback is also thin, with a 5.0 store rating but only 1 review. The most significant risk is delivery performance, as the provided on-time dispatch rate is 0.0%. Overall, this supplier may be considered for cautious trial orders rather than immediate large-scale sourcing.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory area: 13,000+㎡
• Staff size: 180+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Country / province: China, Henan

Elaboration

The supplier has a stated production site of over 13,000㎡ and more than 180 employees, which indicates a medium-sized manufacturing operation rather than a small trading-only profile. The presence of verified supplier status adds some credibility to the company’s operational background. However, the provided data does not include annual production capacity, machinery count, export volume, ownership structure, or specific factory audit details.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size and employee count suggest a stable production foundation, suitable for regular industrial bearing supply. The verified supplier status further supports the company’s credibility. However, because the data does not provide deeper evidence of large-scale production capacity, advanced manufacturing systems, or detailed factory certification, it should not be rated as a top-tier large-scale supply chain provider.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Minor customization
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has several useful platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. The listed tags also show some compliance-related and service-related capabilities, particularly warranty availability and finished product inspection. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established suppliers.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements required for basic procurement confidence: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. These reduce transaction risk to some extent. However, the short 2-year Gold Supplier history limits the strength of long-term platform reliability. The available certification tags are useful but not extensive enough to indicate a highly mature compliance system.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 7
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥6.7K+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier’s recent transaction activity is limited. Seven orders over six months and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value indicate a low level of verified platform sales. While the store rating is 5.0, the rating is based on only 1 review, which makes the feedback base too small to confirm consistent customer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has some proven transaction activity, so it cannot be considered commercially unverified. However, the order volume and transaction value are both low, and the review count is insufficient to validate stable market acceptance. The 5.0 rating is positive, but its procurement value is limited because it is supported by only one review.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Response time: ≤1h
• ODM service available
• Minor customization available
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong communication responsiveness, with a stated response time of less than or equal to one hour. The available service tags indicate ODM service and minor customization capability. However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability, so the supplier’s ability to support complex customized engineering requirements cannot be fully verified.

Scoring Rationale

Fast response time is a strong advantage, especially for sample inquiries, technical clarification, and early-stage procurement communication. ODM service and minor customization also suggest some flexibility. However, because Full Customization is not confirmed, the supplier should not receive the highest service score.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 0.0%

Elaboration

The provided delivery performance data shows an on-time dispatch rate of 0.0%. This is a major concern from a procurement perspective, especially for buyers requiring reliable replenishment, project-based delivery schedules, or production-line continuity.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate below 70% should receive less than 5 points. Since the reported rate is 0.0%, the delivery risk is significant. Even if other company indicators are acceptable, this metric materially weakens the supplier’s suitability for time-sensitive procurement.

Final Score

2 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Review count: 1
• Finished product inspection: Available
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True
• Warranty available

Elaboration

The supplier has some positive quality-related indicators, including finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These suggest a basic quality assurance framework. However, customer feedback is extremely limited, with only 1 review. Although the store rating is 5.0, the small review base prevents a strong conclusion about long-term quality consistency.

Scoring Rationale

The existence of finished product inspection and warranty support provides a reasonable quality foundation. Verified supplier status also improves confidence. However, the limited number of customer reviews means quality performance is not strongly validated by buyer experience. Therefore, the supplier deserves a moderate score rather than a high score.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

67 / 100

Score breakdown:

• Company Strength: 16 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16 / 20
• Business Performance: 11 / 20
• Service Capability: 8 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 2 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 14 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Luoyang Boying Bearing Co., Ltd. is conditionally recommended for cautious cooperation, mainly for small-batch sourcing, sample orders, low-MOQ purchasing, and buyers seeking cross roller or cylindrical roller bearing products with initial supplier verification support.

It is not recommended as a primary supplier for urgent, high-volume, or delivery-critical procurement based on the current data, mainly due to the reported 0.0% on-time dispatch rate and limited recent transaction history.

Suitable customer types include: - Buyers requiring small trial orders or sample validation - Industrial bearing purchasers seeking low MOQ options - Customers who can conduct their own quality and delivery verification before scaling orders

Main risks: - Very weak delivery performance based on the provided on-time dispatch rate - Low recent transaction value and limited order volume - Only 1 customer review, making customer satisfaction difficult to validate - Full Customization capability is Insufficient Data

Growth potential exists because the supplier has a medium-sized factory base, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance, fast response time, and finished product inspection. However, larger procurement commitments should only be considered after successful sample testing, delivery verification, and clarification of production capacity and customization capability.