Jiashan Pvb Sliding Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jiashan Pvb Sliding Bearing Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of over 15,000 sqm and more than 80 staff. The company appears to operate as a specialized supplier of sliding bearing, brass, bronze, washer, and bushing-related parts, based on the product data provided. Its profile shows strong platform credibility, including 13 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. Commercial performance is moderate, with 40+ orders and CN¥473.2K+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a high store rating of 4.9 but a relatively limited review base of 10+. Service response is within 4 hours, which is acceptable but not best-in-class. Delivery performance is fair at 88.0% on-time delivery. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking an established, platform-verified manufacturer or supplier for small to medium-volume industrial bearing-related components, while buyers with strict delivery or extensive quality documentation requirements should conduct further verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 15,000+ sqm
• Employee count: 80+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope shown: brass parts, bronze thrust washers, bushings, and related sliding bearing components

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area exceeding 15,000 sqm, which indicates a meaningful physical production or operating base. The employee count of 80+ staff suggests a small-to-medium-sized manufacturing organization rather than a very large-scale industrial group. The presence of verified supplier status strengthens the credibility of the declared company profile, although the provided data does not include detailed information on production lines, annual capacity, machinery lists, or factory audit reports.

The listed products are concentrated around bearing-related and bronze/brass components, suggesting a focused product category rather than a broad general trading assortment. This can be positive for buyers looking for specialized component sourcing, but the available data is insufficient to confirm depth of engineering capability, testing equipment, or production scalability.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates a solid physical footprint and a reasonable staff base, supported by verified supplier status. However, the employee count is not large enough to classify it as a major large-scale supply chain operator, and production capacity details are not provided. Therefore, it fits best within the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top-tier large-scale category.

Final Score: 16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 13 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags provided: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 88.0%”
• Other formal product, factory, or management system certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform history, with 13 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a meaningful credibility indicator because long-term platform presence reduces the risk associated with newly listed or short-history suppliers. Trade Assurance support also provides buyers with a platform-backed transaction mechanism, which is important for payment and order protection.

Verified supplier status further improves credibility, indicating that some supplier information has been checked through the platform or related verification process. However, the data does not provide evidence of ISO certification, product compliance certificates, third-party factory audit reports, or industry-specific certifications. The listed tags mainly relate to service and delivery performance rather than formal compliance documentation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile due to 13 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These factors justify a high score. However, the absence of specific certification documentation or detailed factory compliance records prevents a full score.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Past 6-month orders: 40+
• Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥473.2K+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 40 orders over the past six months, showing active commercial engagement on the platform. The transaction value of CN¥473.2K+ indicates measurable sales performance, though it does not represent exceptionally high transaction volume compared with large-scale high-frequency suppliers.

The store rating of 4.9 is strong and suggests positive customer satisfaction among recorded buyers. However, the review count is only 10+, which limits the statistical confidence of the rating. A high score based on a small review base should be interpreted cautiously, as the data does not yet show broad customer validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable business activity with a moderate number of recent orders and a meaningful transaction amount. The 4.9 rating is favorable, but the limited number of reviews and moderate order scale keep the supplier below the high-volume, highly validated category. This supports a mid-to-upper score within the stable trading range.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4h
• Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
• Other service indicators: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. This is suitable for standard procurement inquiries, quotation clarification, and routine order coordination. However, it does not reach the strongest service benchmark of response within 1 hour.

There is no provided evidence that the supplier supports Full Customization. Since many industrial component buyers may require drawings, material specifications, tolerances, or OEM part matching, the lack of customization data is an important limitation. The product list includes OEM-related part descriptions, but the data does not explicitly confirm customization service capability, so this cannot be assumed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates normal responsiveness but lacks confirmed strong customization capability. The response speed is adequate, yet not top-tier. Because Full Customization support is not confirmed, the score should remain in the normal service capability range rather than the highest category.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 88.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 88.0% places it in the 80%–89% performance band. This indicates generally acceptable delivery reliability, but also shows that delivery execution is not consistently excellent. For buyers with flexible lead times, this level may be manageable. For buyers operating under strict production schedules or maintenance deadlines, the 88.0% rate should be treated as a risk factor.

The data does not include average lead time, late shipment reasons, logistics methods, or historical delivery volume behind the percentage. Therefore, the assessment is based only on the provided on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. Since 88.0% is close to the upper end of this band but still below 90%, the supplier receives the higher score within this range.

Final Score: 8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Review count: 10+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data
• Product quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive signal for buyer satisfaction. However, the review count of 10+ is relatively limited, so the rating should not be treated as broad market validation. The verified supplier status adds some credibility to the company profile, but the provided data does not confirm whether finished product inspection is available or whether formal quality control procedures are documented.

For industrial bearing, bushing, brass, and bronze components, quality consistency can be highly important, especially where dimensions, materials, wear resistance, or fitment accuracy matter. The available information does not include inspection methods, material certificates, tolerance controls, defect rates, or third-party testing reports. Therefore, quality confidence is positive but not fully proven.

Scoring Rationale

The strong rating supports a favorable quality impression, while the limited review base and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality certifications reduce certainty. The supplier should be scored as having good but not fully validated quality feedback.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 79 / 100

• Company Strength: 16 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 18 / 20
• Business Performance: 15 / 20
• Service Capability: 7 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 8 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 15 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Jiashan Pvb Sliding Bearing Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers seeking an established supplier for brass, bronze, bushing, washer, and sliding bearing-related components. The supplier is most suitable for small to medium-volume procurement, replacement parts sourcing, and buyers who value long platform history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status.

The main strengths are its 13-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 15,000+ sqm factory area, and strong 4.9 store rating. The main risks are the 88.0% on-time delivery rate, limited review count of 10+, lack of confirmed Full Customization capability, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, formal quality certifications, and detailed factory verification scope.

Before placing large or time-sensitive orders, buyers should request additional documentation, including quality inspection procedures, material or product certificates where applicable, production capacity details, and sample validation. The supplier shows good growth potential as a stable medium-sized sourcing option, but further due diligence is recommended for high-specification or mission-critical procurement.