Jiashan Jianbo Sports Goods Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jiashan Jianbo Sports Goods Co.,Ltd is a Zhejiang, China-based supplier with a reported factory area of 4,000+㎡ and 30+ staff, positioned as a small-to-mid-sized manufacturer or production-oriented supplier for neoprene/SBR/CR/SCR foam materials and related customized material products. The company shows strong platform credibility, including 11 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, and platform tags such as Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full customization, and Minor customization. Its recent commercial performance is solid, with 100+ orders and CN¥743.7K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 5.0 store rating and 20+ reviews. However, the on-time shipping rate of 77.4% is a notable operational risk. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking flexible customization, low MOQ material sourcing, and platform-protected transactions, but delivery reliability should be managed carefully through clear lead-time agreements and shipment monitoring.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 4,000+㎡
• Employees: 30+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope shown: neoprene foam, SBR/SCR/CR materials, flame retardant suede with foam, diving-material-related products

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed physical production base of 4,000+㎡ and a workforce of 30+ staff. This indicates a real operating entity with basic manufacturing and handling capacity, but the employee scale remains relatively modest compared with larger industrial manufacturers. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence that the company has passed some form of platform-side verification, though no additional factory audit certificate, ISO certification, or third-party production capacity report is provided in the data.

The product listings suggest the company focuses on flexible foam and neoprene-related materials, with low MOQs such as 1 meter, 1 yard, 2 meters, and 1 piece depending on the product. This indicates flexibility for sample orders, small-batch sourcing, and customized material procurement.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates a stable basic production foundation through its 4,000+㎡ factory area, 30+ staff, and verified supplier status. However, the employee count is relatively small, and there is no additional data showing large-scale production lines, annual output, machinery count, or internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, it should not be assessed as a large-scale supply chain operator. It fits best into the lower-to-middle range of a stable medium or small-to-mid supplier.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 11 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform/industry tags: Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a long platform history, with 11 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a strong indicator of platform continuity and commercial visibility. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with transaction protection within the ecosystem. The supplier is also marked as verified, and its listed capability tags include both inspection and customization-related services.

The available compliance-related information is platform-based rather than formal certification-based. The data does not provide ISO, BSCI, OEKO-TEX, REACH, SGS, or other independent certification details, so these cannot be assumed. Nevertheless, within the platform credibility framework, the supplier has a strong profile.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 11-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple capability tags creates a strong credibility foundation. The only limitation is the absence of separately disclosed third-party compliance certificates or factory audit reports beyond the platform-provided verification and tags. Based strictly on the provided data, this supplier shows a mature and credible profile.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥743.7K+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved more than 100 orders over the past six months, with transaction value exceeding CN¥743.7K. This reflects a meaningful level of recent buyer activity and indicates that the supplier is not inactive or purely promotional. The 5.0 store rating is positive, showing strong satisfaction among rated buyers.

However, the review count is 20+, which is positive but not yet a large review base. Therefore, while the supplier has good recent order and transaction indicators, the customer feedback volume is still moderate rather than extensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates stable commercial activity, supported by 100+ recent orders and a transaction amount above CN¥743.7K. The 5.0 rating strengthens the business performance profile. However, the review count remains relatively limited, and the data does not show very high-volume transaction history beyond the six-month period. As a result, the supplier is best evaluated as having solid medium-level business performance rather than top-tier large-volume validation.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Response time: ≤5h
• Full customization: Available
• Minor customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier supports Full customization, Minor customization, and ODM service according to the provided platform tags. This indicates relatively strong flexibility for buyers requiring product adaptation, material adjustments, or customized specifications. The response time is reported as ≤5 hours, which is acceptable for international sourcing communication but does not meet the highest standard of ≤1 hour.

No additional data is provided on multilingual support, dedicated account managers, technical documentation speed, sample development lead time, or after-sales process. These areas must therefore be treated as Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has clear customization capability, including full customization and ODM availability, which is a strong service advantage. The response time of ≤5 hours is reasonable but not top-tier. Because the response speed is not within one hour, the supplier should not receive the highest service score. Still, the combination of customization capability and acceptable response speed supports a strong mid-to-high rating.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time shipping rate: 77.4%

Elaboration

The on-time shipping rate is 77.4%, which places the supplier in the 70%–79% performance band. This is below the preferred benchmark for stable international procurement, especially for buyers with strict delivery windows, seasonal production plans, or downstream manufacturing schedules.

The data does not provide average lead time, late shipment reasons, logistics methods, export experience, or improvement trends. Therefore, the cause of the delivery performance cannot be determined and should be marked as Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, a 70%–79% on-time shipping rate corresponds to 5–6 points. At 77.4%, the supplier is near the upper end of this band, but still clearly below 80%. This makes delivery reliability the most visible weakness in the current supplier profile. Buyers should manage this risk through written delivery commitments, buffer time, and staged order planning.

Final Score

6 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Reviews: 20+
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier: True
• Factory Verification: Not separately stated; supplier verification is provided
• Additional quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is a strong quality and satisfaction signal within the platform environment. The presence of Finished Product Inspection suggests that there is at least a stated inspection process before shipment. The verified supplier status also adds credibility to the supplier’s operational profile.

However, the review count is 20+, which is positive but not extensive. The data does not disclose detailed defect rates, inspection standards, sample approval procedures, quality control staffing, testing equipment, or third-party quality certifications. Therefore, the quality system appears credible at a platform level, but not fully proven through independent documentation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a favorable quality score due to its 5.0 rating, Finished Product Inspection tag, and verified supplier status. However, the relatively modest number of reviews and lack of disclosed independent quality certifications prevent it from being rated in the highest tier. The current evidence supports a good but not fully comprehensive quality assurance assessment.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Jiashan Jianbo Sports Goods Co.,Ltd is suitable for buyers seeking neoprene/SBR/CR/SCR foam materials, flexible MOQ options, and customization-supported sourcing through Trade Assurance. The supplier is especially appropriate for small-to-medium buyers, sample development projects, customized material orders, and buyers who value platform-protected transactions.

The key strengths are its 11-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, customization capability, 5.0 store rating, and recent order activity of 100+ orders over six months. These factors indicate a credible and commercially active supplier.

The main risk is delivery performance, with an on-time shipping rate of only 77.4%. Buyers with strict delivery schedules should use clear purchase contracts, confirmed lead times, milestone tracking, and shipment buffers. The second limitation is the relatively small employee scale and limited public quality documentation.

Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential due to its platform maturity, customization services, and recent transaction performance, but delivery control should be a priority before scaling orders.