Yiwu Zhixia Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Yiwu Zhixia Sports Goods Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Yiwu Zhixia Sports Goods Co., Ltd. is a Zhejiang-based Chinese supplier positioned in sports goods, cheerleading props, customizable football-related products, and graduation shawl items. Based on the provided data, the company shows a moderate operational foundation, with a reported factory area of over 9,100㎡, more than 100 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is supported by Gold Supplier status for 2 years, Trade Assurance, and service labels including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, warranty availability, and full customization. Commercial performance appears active but not high-volume, with 60+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.5 store rating and 30+ reviews. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking customizable small-to-medium batch sports or promotional products. Key caution areas include a relatively limited Gold Supplier history, moderate review volume, and a below-80% on-time shipment rate.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 9,100+㎡
• Staff count: 100+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Product scope shown: customizable football logo products, EVA cheerleading props, graduation shawls

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a meaningful physical production base, with a factory area exceeding 9,100㎡ and over 100 employees. This indicates that the company is not a micro-scale trader and has a certain level of organized operational capacity. The presence of verified supplier status further strengthens its basic credibility as a manufacturing or factory-backed supplier.

However, the provided data does not include detailed production capacity, monthly output, equipment list, production lines, factory audit report content, or specific internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, while the company appears to have a stable medium-sized production foundation, there is insufficient data to confirm large-scale manufacturing capability or advanced compliance maturity.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size and employee base support a medium-level supplier profile. The verified supplier status adds confidence, but the absence of detailed capacity data or named factory certifications prevents classification as a large-scale or highly mature supply chain operator. The company fits the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top tier.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / service labels:
• Warranty available
• Finished product inspection
• ODM service available
• Full customization
• Verified supplier status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance provide basic transactional protection and platform-level trust support. The verified supplier status further improves credibility, suggesting that the supplier has passed some level of platform verification.

The supplier also lists multiple useful compliance and service-related tags, including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, warranty availability, and full customization. These labels indicate a relatively complete platform presentation. However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 2 years, which is still relatively short compared with long-established suppliers. No specific third-party certificates, product safety certifications, or international compliance documents are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core trust mechanisms in place: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verification. The listed service and inspection tags are also positive. Nevertheless, the short 2-year Gold Supplier history and lack of detailed certificate names limit the score from reaching the highest credibility band.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 60+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
• Store rating: 4.5
• Review count: 30+

Elaboration

The supplier shows active recent business activity, with over 60 orders and more than CN¥202.8K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has ongoing commercial validation and is not inactive on the platform.

The store rating of 4.5 is acceptable and suggests generally positive buyer feedback. However, the review base of 30+ is moderate rather than extensive. The order quantity and transaction amount show stable activity, but they do not indicate high-volume commercial dominance. There is also insufficient data regarding repeat purchase rate, major buyer types, export markets, or long-term customer relationships.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has real recent transaction evidence and a reasonable rating, which supports a mid-level business performance score. However, the order count, transaction amount, and review volume remain moderate, so the supplier should not be scored as a high-performing, heavily validated marketplace vendor.

Final Score

14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3 hours
• Full customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response time of within 3 hours, which is acceptable for international sourcing communication. It also supports full customization and ODM service, both of which are important for buyers seeking branded, logo-based, promotional, or customized sports-related products.

The available product data also includes customizable items, such as football logo products, EVA cheerleading props, and graduation shawls, supporting the supplier’s positioning toward customization-oriented orders. However, the response time is not within 1 hour, and the dataset does not include evidence regarding English communication quality, sample development speed, design support capability, or after-sales handling process.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has solid customization capability and reasonable responsiveness. However, because the response time is ≤3 hours rather than ≤1 hour, and because communication quality details are not provided, the service capability is strong but not top-tier.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time shipment rate: 77.8%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time shipment rate is 77.8%, which places it within the 70–79% range. This indicates that delivery reliability is below the preferred benchmark for buyers who require highly consistent fulfillment performance. While the supplier is still capable of fulfilling orders, the data suggests that late shipments may occur at a meaningful frequency.

No additional data is provided regarding average lead time, peak-season delivery performance, logistics partners, urgent order handling, or historical delay reasons. Therefore, delivery risk should be treated as a key procurement consideration, especially for time-sensitive promotional, event, or seasonal orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, a 70–79% on-time shipment rate corresponds to 5–6 points. Since 77.8% is near the upper end of this bracket but still below 80%, the supplier receives the higher score within this band.

Final Score

6 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.5
• Review count: 30+
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.5 store rating, which indicates generally positive customer feedback. The presence of 30+ reviews gives some level of buyer validation, though the review volume is not large enough to be considered highly comprehensive.

The supplier also lists Finished Product Inspection, which is a positive quality-control indicator. Warranty availability further supports basic post-sale confidence. Verified supplier status adds additional quality and credibility support, though the provided data does not include detailed inspection procedures, defect rates, AQL standards, product testing reports, or specific product certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has acceptable customer feedback and basic quality assurance indicators, especially Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. However, the rating is good rather than excellent, and the review count remains moderate. Due to insufficient detailed quality system data, the supplier is placed in the good-but-not-premium quality feedback range.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Yiwu Zhixia Sports Goods Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers looking for small-to-medium batch customized sports goods, cheerleading props, promotional EVA items, logo-based products, and graduation-related textile accessories. The supplier has a reasonable factory base, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, and full customization capability.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers needing customized promotional or sports-related products
- Small-to-medium wholesalers
- Event merchandise buyers
- Brands requiring logo customization with moderate order quantities
- Buyers comfortable with pre-shipment inspection and delivery monitoring

Main risks:
- On-time shipment rate is only 77.8%, creating delivery reliability risk
- Gold Supplier history is relatively short at 2 years
- Review count is moderate at 30+, not yet a large customer feedback base
- Insufficient data on detailed production capacity, product certifications, quality defect rates, and export market experience

Growth potential:
The supplier shows growth potential due to its factory size, customization capability, active recent transactions, and platform compliance features. If delivery performance improves and more quality records or certifications become available, the supplier could become a stronger long-term sourcing candidate. For initial cooperation, buyers should use Trade Assurance, confirm production timelines in writing, request samples, and consider Finished Product Inspection before shipment.