Caston Sports Manufacture Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Caston Sports Manufacture Co.,ltd. is a China-based sports products supplier located in Fujian, with a reported factory area of 6,800+㎡ and 130+ staff. The supplier shows a solid operational profile for medium-scale procurement, supported by factory/supplier verification, 16 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and platform labels including warranty availability, social responsibility, and low MOQ for customization. Its recent business performance is strong, with 400+ orders and CN¥6.7M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.9 store rating and 200+ reviews. Delivery performance is notably strong, with a reported 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified platform credibility, low MOQ access, and stable medium-scale sourcing. Key limitations are the lack of explicit data on Full Customization capability and Finished Product Inspection, which should be confirmed before larger or quality-sensitive orders.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength — 20 Points
Basis
- Company name: Caston Sports Manufacture Co.,ltd.
- Country/Province: China, Fujian
- Factory area: 6,800+㎡
- Employees: 130+ staff
- Verified supplier/factory audit status: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base with 6,800+㎡ of factory space and 130+ employees. This indicates an established manufacturing operation rather than a small trading-only entity. The employee count and factory size suggest the supplier has basic to moderate production capacity suitable for ongoing commercial orders. In addition, the “Verified Supplier” status strengthens the credibility of the factory information and indicates that at least some level of supplier verification has been completed on the platform.
Scoring Rationale
The company does not appear to be a very large-scale manufacturer based on the provided factory area and staff size, so it does not fully qualify for the highest “large-scale stable supply chain” range. However, the combination of over 6,800㎡ factory area, 130+ staff, and verified supplier status supports a stable medium-sized factory profile. The available data shows sufficient production foundation, but there is no additional information about production lines, monthly capacity, automation level, or factory certifications beyond verification. Therefore, a score in the upper-medium range is appropriate.
Final Score
16 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 16 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification status: Verified supplier/factory audit status marked True
- Certification/industry labels:
- Warranty available
- Socially responsible
- Low MOQ for customization
Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 16-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence and continuity. Trade Assurance support adds transaction protection for buyers, especially for payment security and order fulfillment monitoring within the ecosystem. The supplier also carries platform-facing labels related to warranty availability, social responsibility, and low MOQ customization, which improve buyer confidence. The verified supplier status further supports the reliability of the supplier’s company and factory information.
Scoring Rationale
This dimension is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. The 16-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verification status together represent a mature platform compliance structure. The listed labels are useful, although the data does not provide details on third-party certifications, specific compliance standards, or audit reports. Because the platform credibility indicators are comprehensive and long-standing, but not supported by detailed certification documentation in the provided data, the supplier merits a high score slightly below a perfect rating.
Final Score
19 / 20
3. Business Performance — 20 Points
Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 400+
- Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥6.7M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Number of reviews: 200+
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong recent commercial activity. More than 400 orders in six months reflects active buyer engagement and recurring transaction flow. A six-month transaction value above CN¥6.7M indicates meaningful revenue generation through the platform. The 4.9 store rating is high, and 200+ reviews provide a reasonable volume of buyer feedback rather than relying on a small number of reviews. Together, these indicators suggest that the supplier has been commercially validated by recent buyers.
Scoring Rationale
The data supports a high business performance score. The combination of high order count, substantial transaction value, strong store rating, and a meaningful review base places the supplier in the high-performance category. While the supplier shows strong commercial validation, the data does not break down repeat purchase rate, buyer geography, average order size, or product-level sales distribution. Therefore, the score is high but not perfect.
Final Score
19 / 20
4. Service Capability — 10 Points
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Customization-related information:
- Platform label: “Low MOQ for customization”
- Product listings include references such as “Custom logo”
- Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of ≤2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. This is suitable for normal sourcing communication, quotation follow-up, and order coordination. The available data also shows some customization-related capability, including a “Low MOQ for customization” label and product descriptions referencing custom logo options. However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization, such as full product design customization, material customization, packaging customization, private mold development, or OEM/ODM scope.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs well in responsiveness but does not meet the highest service band because the response time is not stated as ≤1 hour. Customization capability appears present at a basic level, but Full Customization is not confirmed in the provided data. As a result, the supplier should be viewed as having solid standard service capability with some customization support, but buyers requiring complex product development should verify customization scope before proceeding.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points
Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is the strongest possible delivery indicator within the provided scoring framework. This suggests that recent orders have been shipped according to the committed dispatch timelines on the platform. For procurement buyers, this is a positive signal for order planning, inventory replenishment, and seasonal purchasing schedules.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, the maximum score is justified. However, the data does not include average lead time, production lead time, shipping method performance, or late-delivery dispute history. The score is based strictly on the provided on-time dispatch rate.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points
Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Number of reviews: 200+
- Verified supplier/factory audit status: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Supported by verified supplier/factory audit status marked True
Elaboration
The supplier has strong visible customer feedback, with a 4.9 rating and 200+ reviews. This provides a meaningful quality-related reference from prior buyers. The verified supplier/factory audit status also adds a level of quality assurance by confirming that supplier information has passed platform verification. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier offers Finished Product Inspection, third-party inspection, pre-shipment inspection, or documented internal QC procedures.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier deserves a strong quality and feedback score due to its high rating, meaningful review count, and verified status. These factors indicate positive buyer satisfaction and some level of platform-backed trust. Nevertheless, because Finished Product Inspection is not confirmed and detailed quality control systems are not provided, the supplier cannot be rated at the very top of the range. For quality-sensitive procurement, additional confirmation of inspection standards, defect handling process, and pre-shipment QC procedures would be necessary.
Final Score
17 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 16 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 19 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 19 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 7 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 10 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 17 / 20 |
| Total Score | 88 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with verification required for customization depth and quality inspection procedures.
Caston Sports Manufacture Co.,ltd. is a strong candidate for buyers looking for a verified, commercially active, medium-scale supplier with strong platform credibility. The supplier is especially suitable for small to medium buyers, trial-order buyers, low-MOQ procurement, and buyers who value Trade Assurance protection and proven recent transaction activity.
Suitable customer types:
- Buyers requiring low MOQ access
- Buyers seeking a verified supplier with long platform history
- Procurement teams looking for stable recent order performance
- Buyers needing reliable dispatch performance based on platform data
Main risk points:
- Full Customization capability is not explicitly confirmed.
- Finished Product Inspection is not confirmed.
- No detailed production capacity, lead time, QC workflow, or certification documents are provided.
Growth potential:
The supplier has strong platform credibility, active transaction performance, and high customer ratings. If it can provide clearer documentation on quality inspection systems, customization scope, and production capacity, it could be suitable for larger or more quality-sensitive procurement programs.
Leave your comment