Dongguan Yigan Jindong Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Dongguan Yigan Jindong Sports Goods Co., Ltd.
Country/Region: Guangdong, China

Executive Summary

Dongguan Yigan Jindong Sports Goods Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based apparel supplier offering custom men’s wear and OEM shirt-related products with low MOQ starting from 50 pieces. Based on the provided data, the company operates from a 2,000+㎡ factory with 40+ staff and is marked as a verified supplier, indicating basic manufacturing capability and some level of factory credibility. On , the supplier has 4 years of Gold Supplier status, supports Trade Assurance, and has achieved 50+ orders with CN¥270.4K+ transaction value over the past six months. Its store rating is strong at 4.9, though the review base is limited at 10+ reviews. The main weakness is delivery reliability, with an on-time delivery rate of only 60.0%, which represents a significant procurement risk. This supplier is more suitable for small to medium buyers seeking low-MOQ customized apparel, provided delivery timelines are closely managed.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 2,000+㎡
• Employees: 40+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical factory scale of over 2,000㎡ and more than 40 employees, which indicates basic in-house production capacity. This size suggests the company is not a large-scale industrial manufacturer, but it has sufficient infrastructure to support small to medium-volume apparel orders. The verified supplier status adds credibility to its operational presence, although no further details are provided regarding specific audit standards, production lines, monthly output, machinery, or factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates a stable but relatively limited manufacturing base. Its factory size and workforce place it closer to a small-to-medium supplier rather than a large-scale production enterprise. The verified supplier status improves confidence, but the absence of detailed production capacity, equipment information, or recognized factory certifications limits the score. Therefore, it fits the category of a smaller factory with basic production capability.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier status: True
• Platform tags: “Low MOQ for customization”, “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 60.0%”
• Additional compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 4 years and supports Trade Assurance, which provides a reasonable level of platform-backed transaction security. Verified supplier status further strengthens its credibility on the platform. The presence of platform tags related to customization and response time indicates that some operational attributes are recognized by the platform. However, the data does not show additional industry certifications, product compliance certifications, or third-party factory audit details beyond the supplier verification status.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core trust elements: Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. A 4-year Gold Supplier history indicates a moderate operating track record on the platform, but it is not long enough to be considered highly mature. The lack of detailed certification information prevents a higher score. Overall, the supplier has acceptable platform credibility, but compliance depth remains limited based on the available data.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 50+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥270.4K+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has completed more than 50 orders in the past six months, with a transaction value exceeding CN¥270.4K. This indicates active commercial performance and a certain level of buyer acceptance. The store rating of 4.9 is strong and suggests positive customer experience among recorded buyers. However, the review count is only 10+, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. The transaction volume appears moderate rather than high.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows measurable business activity with a reasonable order count and transaction amount. The high rating is positive, but the relatively small review base means the performance validation is not yet broad enough to qualify as highly proven. Compared with suppliers showing very high order volume, large transaction value, and extensive reviews, this supplier should be considered commercially active but still at a medium validation level.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Response time: ≤3h
• Platform tag: “Low MOQ for customization”
• Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as within 3 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency for general sourcing inquiries. The “Low MOQ for customization” tag suggests the supplier can support customized orders at relatively accessible order quantities. Product listings also show OEM/custom-related apparel descriptions, but the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. Therefore, the supplier’s service capability can be regarded as practical for basic customization, but not fully validated for more complex development projects.

Scoring Rationale

The response speed is acceptable, though not within the strongest ≤1-hour category. The supplier appears to support low-MOQ customization, which is useful for smaller buyers or trial orders. However, because Full Customization capability is not explicitly provided, the service score should remain in the normal-to-basic customization range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 60.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 60.0%, which is significantly below the 70% threshold. This indicates a clear delivery risk for buyers with strict launch schedules, seasonal sales plans, or fixed retail delivery windows. Even if the supplier has acceptable production and commercial indicators, this low delivery performance could create operational disruption if not controlled through strict order follow-up, confirmed production schedules, and buffer time.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate below 70% should receive fewer than 5 points. At 60.0%, the supplier’s delivery reliability is weak and represents the most significant risk factor in this evaluation. The score reflects the need for strong delivery management before placing larger or time-sensitive orders.

Final Score

4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 10+
• Verified supplier status: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is positive from a customer feedback perspective. However, the review count is only 10+, meaning the customer feedback base is still limited. Verified supplier status provides some level of supplier credibility, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality control systems. Without evidence of product inspection processes, quality certifications, or inspection reports, the quality assurance structure cannot be considered fully validated.

Scoring Rationale

The high rating supports a positive quality impression, but the limited number of reviews reduces confidence in the consistency of customer satisfaction. Factory verification improves credibility, yet the absence of Finished Product Inspection data and formal quality assurance details limits the score. The supplier appears to have basic quality validation but not a comprehensive quality assurance system based on the provided information.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended.

Dongguan Yigan Jindong Sports Goods Co., Ltd. can be considered for small to medium-sized apparel buyers seeking low-MOQ customized men’s wear or OEM shirt products. The supplier has basic factory capacity, Gold Supplier status for 4 years, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and moderate recent transaction performance.

However, the main risk is delivery reliability. The on-time delivery rate of 60.0% is weak and may not meet the requirements of buyers with strict delivery schedules. The limited review count and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection also require caution.

Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium apparel brands
- Buyers testing low-MOQ customized products
- Importers with flexible delivery timelines
- Customers requiring basic OEM/custom apparel sourcing

Key risks:
- Low on-time delivery rate
- Limited customer review volume
- Insufficient data on finished product inspection
- Limited evidence of advanced factory certification or quality systems

Growth potential:
The supplier shows potential due to its customization positioning, verified supplier status, and active platform transactions. If delivery performance improves and quality inspection data becomes more transparent, its procurement attractiveness would increase significantly.