zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Sunjet Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Shenzhen Sunjet Electronic Co., Ltd.

Shenzhen Sunjet Electronic Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Sunjet Electronic Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based Chinese supplier offering LED-related party, concert, festival, message, and custom logo products with relatively low MOQs ranging from 50 to 100 pieces based on the provided product listings. The company appears to be a small-scale but commercially active supplier, with a reported factory area of 600+ m² and 30+ staff. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and business performance: it has 19 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, is marked as a verified supplier, and has recorded 600+ orders and CN¥7.4M+ transaction value in the past six months. Store rating is strong at 4.9 with 100+ reviews. Delivery performance is also solid, with a 93.8% on-time delivery rate. However, factory scale is limited, response time is only listed as ≤4h, and data on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, and formal product certifications is insufficient. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking validated platform trading history and moderate-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 600+ m²
  • Staff size: 30+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product listings provided: LED text/message, party music, sound-activated glowing, concert/festival/work ID, custom logo glowing products
  • Factory audit or detailed factory certification: Insufficient Data beyond “verified supplier”

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical factory presence with 600+ m² of reported production area and 30+ employees. This indicates basic manufacturing capability but does not suggest a large-scale production base. The staff and facility size are more consistent with a small to lower-mid-sized supplier rather than a large industrial manufacturer. The “verified supplier” status provides some positive support for company legitimacy, but the data does not include detailed factory audit reports, production line quantity, equipment lists, monthly capacity, or quality-system certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates real operational presence and verified supplier status, which supports basic supply reliability. However, the relatively small factory area and staff count limit the assessment of large-volume or highly complex production capability. Since no detailed production capacity or factory certification data is provided, the score should remain within the “small but with basic production capability” range.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 19 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification/industry tags: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 93.8%”
  • Formal product compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

This supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 19-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term marketplace presence. Trade Assurance availability adds transactional protection for buyers, and verified supplier status further supports credibility. The available tags also show measurable service and delivery indicators. However, the provided certification labels do not include specific product compliance certifications, factory management certifications, or industry-standard certificates.

Scoring Rationale

The long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status form a strong credibility foundation. The main limitation is the lack of specific compliance certification data beyond platform-level verification and performance tags. Overall, the supplier has a highly credible platform profile, though not fully documented from a compliance-certification perspective.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Past 6-month orders: 600+
  • Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥7.4M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Review count: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong commercial activity over the past six months, with more than 600 orders and transaction value exceeding CN¥7.4M. This indicates active buyer demand and a proven transaction record on the platform. A 4.9 store rating with 100+ reviews further supports positive market validation. The review quantity is meaningful, though not extremely large compared with very high-volume marketplace suppliers.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of high recent order volume, substantial transaction value, and a high store rating indicates strong business performance. The supplier has passed beyond minimal commercial validation and appears to maintain stable buyer engagement. The score is high, with a minor reservation only because the review count is listed as 100+ rather than a larger, more granular figure.

Final Score

19 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤4h
  • Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
  • Product listings include custom-related titles, but no explicit platform service label confirming Full Customization was provided

Elaboration

The supplier’s listed response time of ≤4h indicates acceptable communication responsiveness. This is useful for sourcing communication, quotation requests, and order follow-up. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier officially supports Full Customization. Although several product names include words such as “Custom” and “Custom LOGO,” this cannot be treated as verified Full Customization capability without explicit service information.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is reasonable but does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since Full Customization support is not confirmed, the service capability should be scored as normal rather than excellent. The supplier appears suitable for standard communication and basic inquiry handling, but customization depth remains insufficiently documented.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 93.8%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 93.8% exceeds the 90% benchmark for strong delivery performance. This suggests that the supplier has a generally reliable record in meeting shipping timelines on the platform. Delivery performance is one of the supplier’s stronger operational indicators based on the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. At 93.8%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery reliability, though not perfect. A high score is justified, while leaving slight room for improvement due to the remaining late-delivery percentage.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Review count: 100+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Supplier verification is indicated as True, but detailed factory verification documents are not provided
  • Product quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

Customer feedback is positive, with a high 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews. This suggests generally favorable buyer satisfaction. The verified supplier status provides additional confidence, but quality assurance data is incomplete. No explicit Finished Product Inspection information is provided, and no product-level compliance certificates or detailed quality-control process documentation is included in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in visible customer feedback metrics, which supports a positive quality impression. However, quality-system verification is not fully documented. The absence of Finished Product Inspection data and product certification information prevents the supplier from reaching the top scoring band. The rating and reviews justify a good score, but not an excellent one.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 19 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended with controlled qualification.

Shenzhen Sunjet Electronic Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking an -validated supplier with strong transaction history, high store rating, reliable delivery performance, and low MOQ product options. It is especially appropriate for small to mid-sized procurement programs, promotional product buyers, event-related product sourcing, and customers prioritizing platform credibility and Trade Assurance protection.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers requiring low MOQ orders of 50–100 pieces
- Importers or distributors seeking commercially validated suppliers
- Event, party, concert, or festival product buyers based on the listed product categories
- Buyers who value Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance

Main risk points:
- Small factory scale: 600+ m² and 30+ staff may limit large-volume capacity
- Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Formal product certifications or compliance documents: Insufficient Data
- Detailed production capacity and factory audit documentation: Insufficient Data

Growth potential:
The supplier has strong platform maturity, 19 years of Gold Supplier history, high recent transaction value, and strong customer feedback. If it can provide clearer quality inspection records, customization capability details, and product compliance documentation, it could become more suitable for higher-value and larger-scale procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen Y&J Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Y&J Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinnanming Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinnanming Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ysap Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ysap Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Noyafa Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Noyafa Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gilong Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gilong Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tuozhi Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tuozhi Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Leadingplus Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Leadingplus Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yuanchuangli Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yuanchuangli Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Merpower Electronic Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Merpower Electronic Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Konsta Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Konsta Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wochuan Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wochuan Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bestview Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bestview Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kiosk Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kiosk Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bolergifts Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bolergifts Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen T.D.S Electronic Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen T.D.S Electronic Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinyi Electronic Digital Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinyi Electronic Digital Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinghongtu Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinghongtu Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sinhor Electronic Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sinhor Electronic Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Danone Xintong Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Danone Xintong Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Maihua Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Maihua Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Guangzhou Qinglai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qinglai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gandian Lightning Protection Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gandian Lightning Protection Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Linkland Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Linkland Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Taidake Carbon Fiber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Taidake Carbon Fiber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Longgong Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Longgong Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong First Intelligent Drinking Water Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong First Intelligent Drinking Water Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Fullstar Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Fullstar Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kinglisheng Electronic & Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kinglisheng Electronic & Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Caifu Door Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Caifu Door Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Baode Heat-Exchanger Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Baode Heat-Exchanger Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Enze Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Enze Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Muyuan Wire Mesh Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Muyuan Wire Mesh Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Aorun International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Aorun International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Xingda Imp&Exp Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Xingda Imp&Exp Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Oto Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Oto Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Longxiang Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Longxiang Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Boyue Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Boyue Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Jiayuan Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Jiayuan Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Hongsheng Cultural And Creative Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Hongsheng Cultural And Creative Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Transcold Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Transcold Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026