zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Yuanchuangli Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Shenzhen Yuanchuangli Electronic Co., Ltd.

Shenzhen Yuanchuangli Electronic Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Yuanchuangli Electronic Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based supplier listed on with a focus on EV charging-related electronic products and control boards, including EVSE control boards, ISO 15118 SECC PnC EVSE controllers, and custom EV charging PCB solutions. The supplier shows moderate commercial validation, with 80+ orders and CN¥946.5K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.5 store rating and 30+ reviews. Platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 3 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, Finished Product Inspection, and customization capability labels. However, factory area and employee count are not provided, limiting the assessment of actual production scale. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume EV charging electronics, customized PCB/control-board solutions, or trial-to-medium procurement orders, while larger-volume buyers should conduct additional factory capacity verification before committing.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company name: Shenzhen Yuanchuangli Electronic Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: Insufficient Data
  • Employee count: Insufficient Data
  • Verified supplier / factory verification: True
  • Product coverage includes EVSE control boards, ISO 15118 SECC PnC EVSE controllers, Open API custom EV charging PCB, and Level 2-related products.

Elaboration

The supplier presents a specialized product portfolio in EV charging electronics and EVSE control/control-board-related components. The available product list suggests technical positioning in EV charging infrastructure components rather than broad general electronics. The presence of verified supplier status provides some confidence that the supplier has undergone a platform-level verification process.

However, key indicators for production scale are missing. Factory area and employee count are both not disclosed, which restricts the ability to evaluate whether the supplier operates as a large-scale manufacturer, a medium-sized factory, or a smaller specialized electronics supplier. Without these data points, production capacity, workforce stability, and scalability cannot be fully validated.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives credit for being a verified supplier and for having a focused EV charging electronics product range. However, the lack of factory area and employee data materially weakens the assessment of manufacturing strength. Based on the available information, the supplier can be considered to have basic verified operational capability, but there is insufficient evidence to classify it as a large or clearly mid-sized production entity.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished Product Inspection
  • Full customization
  • Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a relatively complete platform credibility profile. Being a Gold Supplier for 3 years indicates a sustained platform presence, though it is not yet a long-tenure supplier. Trade Assurance support provides transaction-level protection, which is important for cross-border procurement risk control. Verified supplier status adds further credibility, while the listed labels show support for warranty, product inspection, and customization services.

The compliance-related profile is stronger than basic suppliers that only have product listings without platform verification or Trade Assurance. However, the provided data does not include internationally recognized factory certifications such as ISO, IATF, UL factory certification, or other third-party management system certifications. Therefore, while platform credibility is solid, broader compliance depth remains partially unverified.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core credibility elements expected from a stable vendor: Gold Supplier status, 3-year platform history, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and inspection/customization labels. The score is not placed in the highest range because the Gold Supplier tenure is moderate rather than long-term, and no independent factory management or industry certification details are provided beyond the platform labels.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 80+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥946.5K+
  • Store rating: 4.5
  • Number of reviews: 30+

Elaboration

The supplier has generated measurable transaction activity in the past six months. An order count of 80+ indicates ongoing buyer engagement, while CN¥946.5K+ in transaction value shows that the supplier has achieved a meaningful commercial volume on the platform. The 4.5 store rating is generally positive, though not at the highest level. The review count of 30+ provides some customer feedback base, but it is not large enough to represent extensive market validation.

The transaction profile suggests a supplier with active commercial operations and a certain level of buyer acceptance. However, compared with suppliers showing very high order volumes, large transaction values, and hundreds or thousands of reviews, the current data points to a moderate business scale rather than a leading high-volume performer.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable mid-level business performance: order volume and transaction value are meaningful, and customer rating is acceptable. The score is not higher because the review base remains limited and the store rating, while positive, is not exceptionally high. Overall, the supplier has enough transaction evidence to support initial procurement consideration, especially for small-to-medium order volumes.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Full customization: Available
  • Minor customization: Available

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a practical service capability profile. A response time of within 3 hours is acceptable for -based supplier communication and suggests reasonable responsiveness. The presence of both Full Customization and Minor Customization labels is especially relevant for EV charging electronics and PCB/control-board products, where buyers may require adjustments to technical specifications, interface requirements, or application scenarios.

However, the response time does not meet the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. Also, the provided data does not include additional service indicators such as dedicated engineering support, sample lead time, multilingual sales support, or after-sales response procedures. Therefore, service capability can be viewed as functional and customization-oriented, but not fully proven at a premium service level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns a strong score within the normal service range due to clear customization capability and acceptable response time. It does not reach the 9–10 range because the response time is not within one hour, and no additional data is provided to confirm advanced communication efficiency or technical support depth.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 95.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 95.7% is a strong indicator of delivery reliability. According to the scoring framework, a rate above 90% falls into the top delivery performance range. This suggests that the supplier is generally capable of meeting promised shipment timelines on the platform.

For procurement planning, this is a positive signal, especially for buyers managing project-based purchasing or production schedules. However, the data does not provide details on average lead time, production cycle, peak-season capacity, or whether delivery performance varies by product type or order size. Therefore, while the delivery metric is strong, buyers should still confirm lead times for customized or larger orders separately.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s 95.7% on-time delivery rate clearly meets the highest scoring band. This supports a high delivery performance score and indicates low observed platform-level delivery risk based on the provided data.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.5
  • Reviews: 30+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier / factory verification: True
  • Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier has several quality-related support indicators. Finished Product Inspection suggests that some form of pre-shipment or final product checking is available. Verified supplier status adds another layer of credibility, and warranty availability is a positive post-sale support signal. The 4.5 store rating reflects generally favorable customer experience, though it is not at the very top of the rating scale.

The main limitation is the relatively small number of reviews. A base of 30+ reviews provides useful feedback but does not constitute broad customer validation. Additionally, the data does not specify defect rates, inspection standards, test reports, quality certifications, or detailed warranty terms. For electronic control boards and EVSE-related products, buyers should request product-specific quality documentation before larger-scale procurement.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier scores well because it combines a positive rating, available Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and supplier verification. The score is moderated because the review count is limited and no detailed quality management certifications or inspection protocols are provided. The quality assurance profile is credible at a basic-to-good level but not sufficient to classify the supplier as top-tier without additional verification.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 15 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Shenzhen Yuanchuangli Electronic Co., Ltd. is recommended for small-to-medium scale procurement, trial orders, sample development, and customized EV charging electronics projects. The supplier is particularly suitable for buyers seeking EVSE control boards, ISO 15118-related controller products, Open API custom EV charging PCB solutions, or other EV charging electronic components with customization requirements.

The supplier’s key strengths are its platform credibility, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, customization capability, Finished Product Inspection label, strong 95.7% on-time delivery rate, and moderate recent transaction activity.

Main risks include Insufficient Data on factory area and employee count, which limits visibility into true production capacity. Review volume is also relatively limited at 30+, and no detailed factory certifications or quality management system certifications are provided in the available data.

For initial cooperation, buyers should start with sample orders or controlled pilot batches. Before placing large-volume or long-term orders, it is advisable to request factory capacity details, quality control documentation, product test reports, lead time confirmation, and customization feasibility validation. The supplier shows growth potential as a specialized EV charging electronics vendor, but further verification is needed for high-volume or mission-critical procurement.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen Y&J Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Y&J Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinnanming Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinnanming Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sunjet Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sunjet Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ysap Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ysap Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Noyafa Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Noyafa Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gilong Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gilong Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tuozhi Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tuozhi Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Leadingplus Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Leadingplus Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Merpower Electronic Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Merpower Electronic Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Konsta Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Konsta Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wochuan Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wochuan Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bestview Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bestview Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kiosk Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kiosk Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bolergifts Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bolergifts Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen T.D.S Electronic Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen T.D.S Electronic Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinyi Electronic Digital Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinyi Electronic Digital Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinghongtu Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinghongtu Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sinhor Electronic Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sinhor Electronic Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Danone Xintong Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Danone Xintong Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Mondax (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Mondax (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Henan Hengyin Automation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Hengyin Automation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Creatall Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Creatall Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Silvashine Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Silvashine Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Juyuan Mineral Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Juyuan Mineral Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huanlong New Material Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huanlong New Material Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Xinshuang Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Xinshuang Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yisihang Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yisihang Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Landward Heavy Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Landward Heavy Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Deling Electron Technology Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Deling Electron Technology Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hong Kong Amorge Trading Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hong Kong Amorge Trading Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Fuxin Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Fuxin Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Goldmine Fittings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Goldmine Fittings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou New Ade Culture Media Group Co.Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou New Ade Culture Media Group Co.Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou J&H Storefixture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou J&H Storefixture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huayuan Metal Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huayuan Metal Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Timett Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Timett Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Hengyuan Environmental Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Hengyuan Environmental Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Gefang New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Gefang New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Aerospace Sanyou Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Aerospace Sanyou Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Obor New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Obor New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026