Shijiazhuang Juyuan Mineral Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shijiazhuang Juyuan Mineral Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Hebei, offering iron oxide pigment products with low minimum order quantities of 1 kilogram and listed price ranges of CN¥2.57–2.78. The supplier has a reported factory area of 3,100+㎡ and is marked as a verified supplier, but employee count is not provided, limiting the assessment of production scale. On -related credibility indicators, the company has Gold Supplier status for 1 year, supports Trade Assurance, and carries service-related tags such as warranty availability, ODM service availability, response time ≤3h, and on-time delivery of 95.5%. Business performance shows 20+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, but store rating is missing and review count is 0. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium trial orders or price-sensitive sourcing of iron oxide pigments, while larger or quality-sensitive procurement should require further verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Hebei, China
- Factory area: 3,100+㎡
- Employee count: Insufficient Data
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a disclosed factory area of over 3,100㎡, indicating the presence of a physical production or operating site. The verified supplier status provides some confirmation of company existence and baseline operational credibility. However, the absence of employee count prevents a complete assessment of workforce capacity, production scalability, and organizational depth.

Scoring Rationale:
The factory size suggests a small-to-medium operational base rather than a large-scale manufacturing group. Verification improves confidence, but missing employee data weakens the ability to confirm production stability and capacity. Therefore, the company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability but not enough evidence for a high-scale supply-chain rating.

Final Score: 13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Tags: Warranty available, ODM service available, Response time ≤3h, On-time delivery 95.5%

Elaboration:
The supplier has core platform credibility elements, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These features reduce transaction risk compared with unverified suppliers. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits long-term platform credibility.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has several important platform safeguards in place, especially Trade Assurance and verification. The short Gold Supplier duration prevents it from being classified as a long-established, highly proven platform supplier. Certification or industry-label depth beyond the listed platform tags is limited.

Final Score: 16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 20+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded recent transaction activity, with more than 20 orders and over CN¥67.6K in transaction value during the past six months. This shows some commercial validation. However, the absence of a store rating and the lack of customer reviews significantly reduce transparency around buyer satisfaction and repeat acceptance.

Scoring Rationale:
The transaction data indicates a low-to-moderate level of business activity rather than strong market traction. The 0 review count and missing rating mean there is insufficient customer-side evidence to confirm reliability at scale. The supplier has commercial activity, but buyer validation remains limited.

Final Score: 11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- ODM service available: True
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
A response time of ≤3 hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency for standard sourcing inquiries. The ODM service tag indicates some capability to support customized or buyer-specific product requirements. However, there is no explicit evidence of Full Customization capability.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates reasonable responsiveness and some customization support through ODM service availability. Since response time is not within the ≤1 hour benchmark and Full Customization is not confirmed, the service capability is assessed as solid but not high-end.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 95.5%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s listed on-time delivery rate of 95.5% is a strong delivery indicator. This exceeds the 90% threshold and suggests that the supplier has maintained reliable fulfillment performance on recorded platform transactions.

Scoring Rationale:
Based strictly on the provided delivery data, the supplier performs well in shipment punctuality. While this is a strong metric, the report does not include supporting details such as shipment volume, destinations, or order complexity, so the score remains strong but not absolute.

Final Score: 9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory / supplier verification: True
- Warranty available: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has some quality-related support signals, including warranty availability and verified supplier status. However, there is no store rating, no customer reviews, and no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection. This limits confidence in actual product consistency and post-delivery satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale:
Quality assurance cannot be strongly validated from the available data. Factory verification and warranty availability are positive, but the lack of ratings, reviews, and explicit finished product inspection data creates a significant information gap. The supplier has basic quality credibility but insufficient customer feedback evidence.

Final Score: 10 / 20

Total Score

66 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small-to-medium trial procurement, sample testing, or price-sensitive sourcing of iron oxide pigments. The supplier may be suitable for buyers who can start with low-MOQ orders and verify product quality before scaling. Major risks include missing employee data, no store rating, 0 customer reviews, and insufficient evidence of Finished Product Inspection. Growth potential exists due to Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, ODM availability, and strong on-time delivery performance, but larger-volume buyers should request factory documents, production capacity details, inspection records, and samples before placing bulk orders.